Literature DB >> 15191441

Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality.

Sandra A Lowe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of X-rays, computed tomography scanning and nuclear medicine imaging in the pregnant woman is a source of great anxiety for the patient, her family and the treating doctor.
METHODS: A literature review of appropriate databases, articles and relevant institutional protocols was performed. Data was sought regarding any adverse effects of diagnostic radiation in pregnancy, fetal absorbed dose of diagnostic radiation and how the timing of exposure and form of administration might influence these effects.
RESULTS: The estimated radiation dose for a fetus from background sources as well as medical imaging was identified. Most diagnostic radiation procedures will lead to a fetal absorbed dose of less than 1 mGy for imaging beyond the abdomen/pelvis and less than 10 mGy for direct or nuclear medicine imaging. Potential adverse outcomes related to radiation exposure during pregnancy include teratogenicity, genetic damage, intrauterine death and increased risk of malignancy. The only adverse effect statistically proven at the dose levels associated with diagnostic radiation procedures is a very small increase in childhood malignancy, with an estimated increase of one additional cancer death per 1700 10 mGy exposures. The important exception was the risk to the fetal thyroid from radioiodine exposure after 12 weeks' gestation.
CONCLUSION: In practice, diagnostic radiography during pregnancy not involving direct abdominal/pelvic high dosage, is not associated with any significant adverse events. Counselling of pregnant women who require diagnostic radiographic procedures as well as those inadvertently exposed should be based on the available human data with an emphasis on the minimal impact of such procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191441     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00212.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  25 in total

Review 1.  Risks versus benefits of gastrointestinal endoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Mafalda Gomes; Alexandra Matias; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 3.  Lupus and pregnancy: complex yet manageable.

Authors:  Josephine Patricia Dhar; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2006-12

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Hori Yumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Heidi Jackson; Steven Granger; Raymond Price; Michael Rollins; David Earle; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cecal volvulus after twin gestation: laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  C Kosmidis; C Efthimiadis; G Anthimidis; A Tavaniotou; K Vasiliadou; A Ioannidis; A Mekras; G Basdanis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Raymond Price; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Raymond R Price; Allison E Tonkin; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  New approach for predictive measurement of knee cartilage defects with three-dimensional printing based on CT-arthrography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  R Michalik; S Schrading; T Dirrichs; A Prescher; C K Kuhl; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 10.  Radiation dose from initial trauma assessment and resuscitation: review of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine M Hui; John H MacGregor; Homer C Tien; John B Kortbeek
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.