Literature DB >> 27000903

Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery.

Abhijit Shaligram1, Avishai Meyer1, Anton Simorov1, Pradeep Pallati1, Dmitry Oleynikov2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery fellowships offer experience in robotic surgery, the nature of which is poorly defined. The objective of this survey was to determine the current status and opportunities for robotic surgery training available to fellows training in the United States and Canada. Sixty-five minimally invasive surgery fellows, attending a fundamentals of fellowship conference, were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics and experiences with robotic surgery and training. Fifty-one of the surveyed fellows completed the questionnaire (83 % response). Seventy-two percent of respondents had staff surgeons trained in performing robotic procedures, with 55 % of respondents having general surgery procedures performed robotically at their institution. Just over half (53 %) had access to a simulation facility for robotic training. Thirty-three percent offered mechanisms for certification and 11 % offered fellowships in robotic surgery. One-third of the minimally invasive surgery fellows felt they had been trained in robotic surgery and would consider making it part of their practice after fellowship. However, most (80 %) had no plans to pursue robotic surgery fellowships. Although a large group (63 %) felt optimistic about the future of robotic surgery, most respondents (72.5 %) felt their current experience with robotic surgery training was poor or below average. There is wide variation in exposure to and training in robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. Although a third of trainees felt adequately trained for performing robotic procedures, most fellows felt that their current experience with training was not adequate.

Keywords:  Fellowship programs; MIS fellow; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Surgical education

Year:  2012        PMID: 27000903     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  17 in total

1.  Survey of resident training in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Harry W Donias; Raffy L Karamanoukian; Philip L Glick; Jacob Bergsland; Hratch L Karamanoukian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Are you ready to become a robo-surgeon?

Authors:  Yatin R Patel; Harry W Donias; Douglas W Boyd; Ravi U Pande; Jeffery L Amodeo; Raffy L Karamanoukian; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Hratch L Karamanoukian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency.

Authors:  Joseph M Gobern; Christopher M Novak; Ernest G Lockrow
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Minimally invasive training during surgical residency.

Authors:  Gokulakkrishna Subhas; Vijay K Mittal
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors.

Authors:  Gregory P Sfakianos; Peter J Frederick; James E Kendrick; J Michael Straughn; Larry C Kilgore; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Application of robotics in general surgery: initial experience.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Marcelo W Hinojosa; David Finley; Melinda Stevens; Mahbod Paya
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 7.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  R W Holloway; S D Patel; S Ahmad
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

8.  How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  Abhijit Shaligram; Jayaraj Unnirevi; Anton Simorov; Vishal M Kothari; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Irene Suh; Mukul Mukherjee; Dmitry Oleynikov; Ka-Chun Siu
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.547

10.  Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.

Authors:  L C Huffmanm; P K Pandalai; B J Boulton; L James; S L Starnes; M F Reed; J A Howington; M S Nussbaum
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  6 in total

1.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.

Authors:  Jessica Stockheim; Aristotelis Perrakis; Bernhard A Sabel; Robert Waschipky; Roland S Croner
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum.

Authors:  Derek Ballas; Megan Cesta; G Dante Roulette; Margaret Rusnak; Rami Ahmed
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Allison Weaver; Scott Steele
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

5.  Emergency Undocking Curriculum in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Derek A Ballas; Megan Cesta; David Gothard; Rami Ahmed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Current status of robot-assisted urologic surgery in Saudi Arabia: Trends and opinions from an Internet-based survey.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Ahmed A Mobaraki; Hattan M Badr; Noor Nedal; Anmar M Nassir
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.