Literature DB >> 11842967

Survey of resident training in robotic surgery.

Harry W Donias1, Raffy L Karamanoukian, Philip L Glick, Jacob Bergsland, Hratch L Karamanoukian.   

Abstract

Robotics has been recognized as a major driving force in the advancement of minimally invasive surgery. However, the extent to which General Surgery residents are being trained to use robotic technology has never been assessed. A survey was sent to program directors of accredited General Surgery training programs to determine the prevalence and application of robotics in surgical training programs. Responses were tabulated and analyzed. Thirty-three per cent indicated interest in minimally invasive surgery. Twelve per cent of responders have used robotics in their practice, and 65 per cent felt robotics will play an important role in the future of General Surgery. Currently residents from 14 per cent of the responding training programs have exposure to robotic technology, and residents from an additional 4 per cent of these programs have limited didactic exposure. Program directors from 23 per cent of responding programs identified plans to incorporate robotics into their program. Robotics have been shown to make standard endoscopic surgical procedures more efficient and cost-effective as well as allowing a variety of procedures that were only possible with conventional methods to be completed with minimally invasive techniques. This new technology promises to be a large part of the future of surgery and as such deserves more attention in the training of General Surgery residents.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11842967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  14 in total

1.  Applying robotic assistance to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Harry W Donias; Hratch L Karamanoukian; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Eddie L Hoover
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Robotic surgery update.

Authors:  G Jacobsen; F Elli; S Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Status of robotic-assisted surgery among Canadian urology residents.

Authors:  Michael Robinson; Andrew Macneily; Larry Goldenberg; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

6.  Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.

Authors:  Dimitrios Katsavelis; Ka-Chun Siu; Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Irene H Lee; Yong Kwon Lee; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Support vector machines improve the accuracy of evaluation for the performance of laparoscopic training tasks.

Authors:  Brian Allen; Vasile Nistor; Erik Dutson; Greg Carman; Catherine Lewis; Petros Faloutsos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Abhijit Shaligram; Avishai Meyer; Anton Simorov; Pradeep Pallati; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-05-13

9.  Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents' training and opinions on robotic surgery.

Authors:  Aimee L Smith; Karen M Schneider; Pamela D Berens
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

10.  Robotic systems and surgical education.

Authors:  Nicola Di Lorenzo; Giorgio Coscarella; Luca Faraci; Dennis Konopacki; Maurizio Pietrantuono; Achille Lucio Gaspari
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.