| Literature DB >> 27000844 |
Guan-Nan Huo1, Liang Liu1, Hong-Bin He2, Stephen W Attwood3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosoma japonicum remains a major challenge to human and animal health. Earlier microsatellite-based studies reported possible definitive-host-specific private alleles within S. japonicum, opening the possibility that different definitive hosts might harbour different parasite strains. Previous investigations have also detected near-identical multilocus genotypes in populations of adult worms - possibly the result of mutations occurring during the asexual (intramolluscan) phase of clonal expansion. Research has also revealed extensive deviations from Hardy-Weinberg Proportions (HWP) and conflicting results among studies. The present study was performed to examine some of the potential effects of infrapopulation structure on microsatellite-based studies of the transmission ecology of S. japonicum. Potential sources of bias considered included organotropic distribution of worms, non-random mating and corrections for clonal expansion.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic differentiation; Hardy-Weinberg; Infrapopulation; Mating; Microsatellite; Organotropic; Population genetics; Sampling bias; Schistosoma japonicum
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27000844 PMCID: PMC4802887 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1454-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Organotropic distribution of worms and alleles. Counts are given for worms, paired worms, alleles, private (Pr) alleles and total/mean allelic richness, by population, for the alternative datasets used
| Raw Dataset | Filtered Dataset | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hpv | L | M | Hpv | L | M | |
| Males | 49 | 26 | 78 | – | – | – |
| Females | 33 | 13 | 75 | – | – | – |
| Pairs | 42 | 2 | 64 | – | – | – |
| Total worms | 82 | 39 | 153 | 21 | 5 | 9 |
| Alleles | 96 | 76 | 91 | 85 | 39 | 51 |
| PrAlleles | 12 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 2 | 3 |
| Richness | 85.4/12.2 | 73.6/10.5 | 80.3/1.5 | 44.8/6.4 | 34.1/4.9 | 37.3/5.3 |
Hpv Hepatic Portal Vein; L Liver; M Mesentery; - data unavailable or not applicable
As expected, the values for the Clonal dataset were identical to those for the Raw Dataset
Basic population genetic parameters describing each dataset
| Raw Dataset | Filtered Dataset | |
|---|---|---|
| FIS by locus | −0.0966 – 0.0571 (A-F) | −0.0957 – 0.0520 (C-E) |
| Loci with het. def. |
| 4 ( |
| No. loci not in HWP | 7 (all at | 4 (DEFG |
| K2 | 0.379; | 2.667; |
| Richness by locus | 5.723–15.249 | 3.714–6.941 |
The range of FIS values is given together with the two loci delimiting the range. Those loci showing a heterozygote deficiency (het. def.) are listed (in bold if significant), all other loci showed excess heterozygosity. K2 from Bartlett’s test for total sample (all three populations pooled) wide departure from HWP is given, as is the range of allelic richness across all loci. The values for the Clonal dataset were identical to those for the Raw Dataset
Fig. 1Plot of the linear discriminant analyses for the Raw (a) and Filtered (b) datasets. A projection of the MLGs, for individuals, is shown onto the plane defined by the axes of the discriminant analyses. Groups are depicted as ellipses showing the variance within the groups, each ellipse being centered about its group mean. H, samples from hepatic-portal-vein; L, samples from liver; M, samples from mesenteric blood vessels. The upper sub-plot shows the eigenvalue screeplot representing the contribution of each axis to the variation, and the lower sub-plot the magnitude of the retained eigenvectors
Descriptive statistics for the DAPC analyses
| Raw Dataset | Clonal Dataset | Filtered Dataset | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalues | 39.245/36.045 | 31.165/29.502 | 10.632/6.885 |
| Pillai’s | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.696 |
| BIC | 249.662 | 221.446 | 42.358 |
| Membership | 0.098/0.128/0.954 | 0.098/0.128/0.954 | 0.810/0.600/0.778 |
| Prop. Assign. | 0.580 | 0.580 | 0.771 |
The eigenvalues are given for DAPC with cross-validation; the significance of the eigenvalues from Pillai’s test (P value) is given; the BIC value from the K-means procedure is given for (K = 3); also the proportion of successful group membership reassignments is reported by population (Hpv/L/M) and overall (Membership and Prop. Assign., respectively). The membership probabilities below are based on the retained discriminant functions. These statistics are presented for all three datasets
Summary statistics for single-sex analyses in comparison with those for the Raw dataset
| Females | Males | Raw | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIS by locus | −0.2184 – -0.0349 (G-F) | −0.1264 – 0.0739 (G-F) | −0.0966 – 0.0571 (A-F) |
| Loci with het. def. | None | D, E, F | E, F |
| No. loci not in HWP | 7 (all at | 7 (all at | 7 (all at |
| Eigenvalues | 48.976/39.747 | 8.081/3.051 | 39.245/36.045 |
| Pillai’s | 0.0182 | 0.043 | 0.012 |
| Membership | 0.061/0.154/0.973 | 0.163/0.192/0.910 | 0.098/0.128/0.954 |
| Prop. Assign. | 0.636 | 0.549 | 0.580 |
Fig. 2Plots of results of tests for non-random mating. a, the distribution of Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s D for observed (emp, pink) and random (rand, blue) pairings of male and female worms. The overlap of the two distributions suggests that there was no significant difference in Kosman and Leonard’s individual genetic distance between members of actual pairings and those of simulated random pairings. b, plot of heterozygosities (as Internal Relatedness) and regression line for male and female paired worms
Fig. 3Results of a discriminant analysis with laboratory host set as a factor