Literature DB >> 11410155

'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

C Landry1, D Garant, P Duchesne, L Bernatchez.   

Abstract

According to the theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity, mates should choose each other in order to increase the heterozygosity of their offspring. In this study, we tested the 'good genes as heterozygosity' hypothesis of mate choice by documenting the mating patterns of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using both major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and microsatellite loci. Specifically, we tested the null hypotheses that mate choice in Atlantic salmon is not dependent on the relatedness between potential partners or on the MHC similarity between mates. Three parameters were assessed: (i) the number of shared alleles between partners (x and y) at the MHC (M(xy)), (ii) the MHC amino-acid genotypic distance between mates' genotypes (AA(xy)), and (iii) genetic relatedness between mates (r(xy)). We found that Atlantic salmon choose their mates in order to increase the heterozygosity of their offspring at the MHC and, more specifically, at the peptide-binding region, presumably in order to provide them with better defence against parasites and pathogens. This was supported by a significant difference between the observed and expected AA(xy) (p = 0.0486). Furthermore, mate choice was not a mechanism of overall inbreeding avoidance as genetic relatedness supported a random mating scheme (p = 0.445). This study provides the first evidence that MHC genes influence mate choice in fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11410155      PMCID: PMC1088738          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  81 in total

1.  The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations.

Authors:  Etienne Joly
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler.

Authors:  David S Richardson; Jan Komdeur; Terry Burke; Torbjörn von Schantz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The combined role of the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems in social communication in mammals.

Authors:  Kevin R Kelliher
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Contrasting responses to selection in class I and class IIα major histocompatibility-linked markers in salmon.

Authors:  S Consuegra; E de Eyto; P McGinnity; R J M Stet; W C Jordan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Sequence-based evidence for major histocompatibility complex-disassortative mating in a colonial seabird.

Authors:  Frans A Juola; Donald C Dearborn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Recent duplication and inter-locus gene conversion in major histocompatibility class II genes in a teleost, the three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  Thorsten B H Reusch; Helmut Schaschl; K Mathias Wegner
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Self-referent MHC type matching in frog tadpoles.

Authors:  Jandouwe Villinger; Bruce Waldman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Parental relatedness and major histocompatibility effects on early embryo survivorship in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Sara M Turner; Johel Chaves-Campos; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Evidence that pairing with genetically similar mates is maladaptive in a monogamous bird.

Authors:  Hervé Mulard; Etienne Danchin; Sandra L Talbot; Andrew M Ramey; Scott A Hatch; Joël F White; Fabrice Helfenstein; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.