Literature DB >> 27000276

[Ductal adenocarcinoma and unusual differential diagnosis].

P Haage1, C A Schwartz2, C Scharwächter2.   

Abstract

Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma is by far the most common solid tumor of the pancreas. It has a very poor prognosis, especially in the more advanced stages which are no longer locally confined. Due to mostly unspecific symptoms, imaging is key in the diagnostic process. Because of the widespread use of imaging techniques, incidental findings are to a greater extent discovered in the pancreas, which subsequently entail further work-up. Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be mimicked by a large number of different lesions, such as anatomical variants, peripancreatic structures and tumors, rarer primary solid pancreatic tumors, cystic tumors, metastases or different variants of pancreatitis. Additionally, a number of precursor lesions can be differentiated. The correct classification is thus important as an early diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma is relevant for the prognosis and because the possibly avoidable treatment is very invasive. All major imaging techniques are principally suitable for pancreatic imaging. In addition to sonography of the abdomen, usually the baseline diagnostic tool, computed tomography (CT) with its superior spatial resolution, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its good soft tissue differentiation capabilities, possibly in combination with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), endosonography with its extraordinary spatial resolution, conceivably with additional endoscopic retrograde CP or the option of direct biopsy and finally positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) as a molecular imaging tool are all particularly useful modalities. The various techniques all have its advantages and disadvantages; depending on the individual situation they may need to be combined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Upper abdominal sonography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000276     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-016-0090-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  47 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Demographics, epidemiology, and inheritance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Theresa Pluth Yeo
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S Rosewicz; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Strategy to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Kensuke Takuma; Terumi Kamisawa; Rajesh Gopalakrishna; Seiichi Hara; Taku Tabata; Yoshihiko Inaba; Naoto Egawa; Yoshinori Igarashi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael A Farrell; Jeff L Fidler; Lawrence J Burgart; Takashi Koyama; C Daniel Johnson; David H Stephens; Ellen M Ward; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Use of molecular targeted agents for the diagnosis, staging and therapy of neuroendocrine malignancy.

Authors:  R J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Saila P Kauhanen; Gaber Komar; Marko P Seppänen; Kirsti I Dean; Heikki R Minn; Sami A Kajander; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Kalle Alanen; Ronald J Borra; Pauli A Puolakkainen; Pirjo Nuutila; Jari T Ovaska
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Diagnostic value of curved multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT for the detection of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiromichi Fukushima; Shigeki Itoh; Akira Takada; Yoshimi Mori; Kojiro Suzuki; Akiko Sawaki; Shingo Iwano; Hiroko Satake; Toyohiro Ota; Mitsuru Ikeda; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Alan Pietryga; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

Review 10.  MR imaging techniques for pancreas.

Authors:  Temel Tirkes; Christine O Menias; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.