Literature DB >> 26999054

Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection.

Yuanyuan Shen1, Tianxi Cai1.   

Abstract

It is now well recognized that the effectiveness and potential risk of a treatment often vary by patient subgroups. Although trial-and-error and one-size-fits-all approaches to treatment selection remain a common practice, much recent focus has been placed on individualized treatment selection based on patient information (La Thangue and Kerr, 2011; Ong et al., 2012). Genetic and molecular markers are becoming increasingly available to guide treatment selection for various diseases including HIV and breast cancer (Mallal et al., 2008; Zujewski and Kamin, 2008). In recent years, many statistical procedures for developing individualized treatment rules (ITRs) have been proposed. However, less focus has been given to efficient selection of predictive biomarkers for treatment selection. The standard Wald test for interactions between treatment and the set of markers of interest may not work well when the marker effects are nonlinear. Furthermore, interaction-based test is scale dependent and may fail to capture markers useful for predicting individualized treatment differences. In this article, we propose to overcome these difficulties by developing a kernel machine (KM) score test that can efficiently identify markers predictive of treatment difference. Simulation studies show that our proposed KM-based score test is more powerful than the Wald test when there is nonlinear effect among the predictors and when the outcome is binary with nonlinear link functions. Furthermore, when there is high-correlation among predictors and when the number of predictors is not small, our method also over-performs Wald test. The proposed method is illustrated with two randomized clinical trials.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kernel PCA; Kernel machine; Perturbation; Score test; Treatment selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999054      PMCID: PMC5352461          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  A trial of the beta-blocker bucindolol in patients with advanced chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Eric J Eichhorn; Michael J Domanski; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Michael R Bristow; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Peter Kraft; Michael P Epstein; Deanne M Taylor; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian; Peggy H Wong; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

5.  Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.

Authors:  L Gunter; J Zhu; S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2011-01-30

6.  Endocrine responsiveness and tailoring adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team.

Authors:  S M Hammer; D A Katzenstein; M D Hughes; H Gundacker; R T Schooley; R H Haubrich; W K Henry; M M Lederman; J P Phair; M Niu; M S Hirsch; T C Merigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 10.  Predictive biomarkers: a paradigm shift towards personalized cancer medicine.

Authors:  Nicholas B La Thangue; David J Kerr
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 66.675

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pathway aggregation for survival prediction via multiple kernel learning.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinnott; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  [Subgroup identification based on the Logistic model].

Authors:  Yanhong Zhang; Xueyuan Li; Zhijian Wang; Shengli An
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-12-30

3.  Variance components genetic association test for zero-inflated count outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew O Goodman; Lori Chibnik; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Medicine With Software.

Authors:  Adam Kapelner; Justin Bleich; Alina Levine; Zachary D Cohen; Robert J DeRubeis; Richard Berk
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  G9A performs important roles in the progression of breast cancer through upregulating its targets.

Authors:  Wenhua Jiang; Pengfei Liu; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  What is the promise of personalised nutrition?

Authors:  Paola G Ferrario; Bernhard Watzl; Grith Møller; Christian Ritz
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2021-04-06

7.  Individualized treatment effects with censored data via fully nonparametric Bayesian accelerated failure time models.

Authors:  Nicholas C Henderson; Thomas A Louis; Gary L Rosner; Ravi Varadhan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.