Literature DB >> 30613021

[Subgroup identification based on the Logistic model].

Yanhong Zhang1,2, Xueyuan Li3, Zhijian Wang4, Shengli An1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We propose a subgroup identification method based on the Logistic model for data from a two-arm clinical trial with dichotomous outcome variables.In this method, binary Logistic regression models are established for each group to calculate the outcome probabilities of each patient for comparison.According to the established rules, the patients are classified into their corresponding subgroups to establish a multinomial Logistic regression model.We simulated the false rate, correct judgment rate, coincidence rate and model correct judgment rate for different sample sizes and carried out an example analysis.The results of simulation showed that for different sample sizes, the false rates of this method were below 0.07 and the correct judgment rates were all above 0.75 with adequate coincidence rates and model correct judgment rates, demonstrating the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method for subgroup identification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Logistic regression; Monte-Carlo simulation; clinical trials; subgroup identification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30613021      PMCID: PMC6744210          DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.12.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  18 in total

1.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Subgroup Identification in Personalized Treatment of Alcohol Dependence.

Authors:  Jue Hou; Chamindi Seneviratne; Xiaogang Su; Jeremy Taylor; Bankole Johnson; Xin-Qun Wang; Heping Zhang; Henry R Kranzler; Joseph Kang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Exploratory subgroup analysis in clinical trials by model selection.

Authors:  Gerd K Rosenkranz
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 4.  Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Edna Keeney; Therese Dowswell; Nicky J Welton; Nancy Medley; Sofia Dias; Leanne V Jones; Gillian Gyte; Deborah M Caldwell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 5.  Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert: A Review in Cervical Ripening.

Authors:  Matt Shirley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Identification of sub-groups in acutely ill elderly patients with delirium: a cluster analysis.

Authors:  Luísa Lagarto; Joaquim Cerejeira
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.878

7.  Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shen; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The cross-validated adaptive signature design.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Ensemble survival trees for identifying subpopulations in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Chen; James J Chen
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  Clinical Insights for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Prostaglandins.

Authors:  Stephanie Pierce; Ronan Bakker; Dean A Myers; Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.