Literature DB >> 32082916

Complications and management strategies of totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein.

Yusuf Velioğlu1, Ahmet Yüksel1, Emrah Sınmaz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present clinical characteristics, peri-procedural outcomes, early and late complications, and management strategies in patients undergoing totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein.
METHODS: A total of 2,084 port devices were inserted to 2,000 cancer patients (1,066 males, 934 females; mean age 58.4±12.7 years; range, 18 to 88 years) through subclavian vein using percutaneous landmark method between March 2012 and June 2018. Medical data including demographic features, primary diagnosis, technical success, procedural time, duration of device use, reasons for the device removal, and early and late complications were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The most common type of cancer was colon cancer in males and breast cancer in females. Technical success rate of the procedure was 98.5%. Right subclavian vein was accessed in the majority of patients (92.4%). Early complications including inadvertent arterial puncture, catheter malposition, superficial hematoma, and pneumothorax occurred in 143 patients (6.9%), while late complications including infection, catheter occlusion, venous thrombosis, wound problems, catheter migration and embolization and pinch-off syndrome was developed in 118 patients (5.7%). Inadvertent arterial puncture in 63 patients (3%) was the most common early complication, while infection in 44 patients (2.1%) was the most common late complication. A total of 192 devices were removed due to the completion of chemotherapy or development of complications.
CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the safety and tolerability of totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein with high technical success and low complication rates.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; percutaneous; port catheter; subclavian vein; totally implantable venous access device

Year:  2019        PMID: 32082916      PMCID: PMC7018162          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.17972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  31 in total

1.  Routine chest X-rays after insertion of implantable long-term venous catheters: necessary or not?

Authors:  A A Guth
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 2.  Central venous catheter pinch-off and fracture: recognition, prevention and management.

Authors:  B Fazeny-Dörner; C Wenzel; A Berzlanovich; G Sunder-Plassmann; H Greinix; C Marosi; M Muhm
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre.

Authors:  F Narducci; M Jean-Laurent; L Boulanger; S El Bédoui; Y Mallet; J L Houpeau; A Hamdani; N Penel; C Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.

Authors:  L A Orci; R P H Meier; P Morel; W Staszewicz; C Toso
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A comparison of outcomes and complications of totally implantable access port through the internal jugular vein versus the subclavian vein.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nagasawa; Tomoharu Shimizu; Hiromichi Sonoda; Eiji Mekata; Masato Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Ohta; Satoshi Murata; Tsuyoshi Mori; Shigeyuki Naka; Tohru Tani
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury.

Authors:  Sidika Kurul; Pinar Saip; Tulay Aydin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Performance of venous port catheter insertion by a general surgeon: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Aziret; Oktay İrkörücü; Cihan Gökler; Enver Reyhan; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Timuçin Çil; Edip Akpınar; Hasan Erdem; Kamuran Cumhur Değer
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

8.  Risk factors for infectious and noninfectious complications of totally implantable venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Eduardo Zerati; Tamires Rocha Figueredo; Richard Diego de Moraes; Amanda Monteiro da Cruz; Joaquim Mauricio da Motta-Leal Filho; Maristela Pinheiro Freire; Nelson Wolosker; Nelson de Luccia
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2016-04

9.  A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.

Authors:  C Araújo; J P Silva; P Antunes; J M Fernandes; C Dias; H Pereira; T Dias; J L Fougo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Evaluation of complications of totally implantable central venous port system insertion.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Dong Yeon Ryu; Hyuk Jae Jung; Sang Su Lee
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Effect of a New Ligation and Venipuncture Method on Vena Basilica Vessel.

Authors:  Yuanhong Mao; Xiaomei Huang; Hong Yang; Shu Zhou; Aihong Yuan; Gang Lin; Guiling Geng
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Management of outpatient with totally implantable venous access Ports during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Weipeng Yan; Chaoya Zhang; Chenggang Luo; Zilin Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Catheter allotopia with totally implantable access port: A report of three cases and literature review.

Authors:  Jialin Gu; Guoli Wei; Lingchang Li; Yi Ji; Jialin Yu; Canhong Hu; Jiege Huo
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-06

4.  Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Chi-Tsung Wen; Chien-Hung Chiu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yun-Hen Liu; Hui-Ping Liu; Ching-Yang Wu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-24

Review 5.  Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Elena Schembari; Emanuele Gaspare Fontana; Salomone Di Saverio; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.