Literature DB >> 26997746

A Smooth Bootstrap Procedure towards Deriving Confidence Intervals for the Relative Risk.

Dongliang Wang1, Alan D Hutson2.   

Abstract

Given a pair of sample estimators of two independent proportions, bootstrap methods are a common strategy towards deriving the associated confidence interval for the relative risk. We develop a new smooth bootstrap procedure, which generates pseudo-samples from a continuous quantile function. Under a variety of settings, our simulation studies show that our method possesses a better or equal performance in comparison with asymptotic theory based and existing bootstrap methods, particularly for heavily unbalanced data in terms of coverage probability and power. We illustrate our procedure as applied to several published data sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrap; Confidence interval; Quantile function; Relative risk

Year:  2014        PMID: 26997746      PMCID: PMC4796759          DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2012.681418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  8 in total

1.  On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions.

Authors:  A Agresti; Y Min
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.

Authors:  Morten W Fagerland; Stian Lydersen; Petter Laake
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.

Authors:  Alan Agresti; Yongyi Min
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.

Authors:  Alan Agresti; Matilde Bini; Bruno Bertaccini; Euijung Ryu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.

Authors:  Robert M Price; Douglas G Bonett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.

Authors:  Yan Lin; Robert G Newcombe; Stuart Lipsitz; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Relative risk estimated from the ratio of two median unbiased estimates.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; Yan Lin; Stuart R Lipsitz; Robert G Newcombe; Kathie L Hermayer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.864

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Disparities in cancer mortality in Los Angeles County, 1999-2013: an analysis comparing trends in under-resourced and affluent regions.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Phillip Sundin; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Fecal microbiome of periparturient dairy cattle and associations with the onset of Salmonella shedding.

Authors:  Lohendy Muñoz-Vargas; Stephen O Opiyo; Rose Digianantonio; Michele L Williams; Asela Wijeratne; Gregory Habing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.