Literature DB >> 21996567

Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.

Morten W Fagerland1, Stian Lydersen2, Petter Laake3.   

Abstract

The relationship between two independent binomial proportions is commonly estimated and presented using the difference between proportions, the number needed to treat, the ratio of proportions or the odds ratio. Several different confidence intervals are available, but they can produce markedly different results. Some of the traditional approaches, such as the Wald interval for the difference between proportions and the Katz log interval for the ratio of proportions, do not perform well unless the sample size is large. Better intervals are available. This article describes and compares approximate and exact confidence intervals that are - with one exception - easy to calculate or available in common software packages. We illustrate the performances of the intervals and make recommendations for both small and moderate-to-large sample sizes.
© The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Keywords:  2 × 2 table; NNT; odds ratio; relative risk; risk difference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21996567     DOI: 10.1177/0962280211415469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  32 in total

1.  Non-inferiority tests for anti-infective drugs using control group quantiles.

Authors:  Michael P Fay; Dean A Follmann
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Integrative Analysis of Disease Signatures Shows Inflammation Disrupts Juvenile Experience-Dependent Cortical Plasticity.

Authors:  Milo R Smith; Poromendro Burman; Masato Sadahiro; Brian A Kidd; Joel T Dudley; Hirofumi Morishita
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-01-18

3.  A Smooth Bootstrap Procedure towards Deriving Confidence Intervals for the Relative Risk.

Authors:  Dongliang Wang; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 0.893

Review 4.  Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Rakesh Shukla
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-08-22

5.  Pediatric Posttonsillectomy Analgesia Before and After the Black Box Warning Against Codeine Use.

Authors:  William C Van Cleve
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Structural and Pragmatic Language Impairments in Children Evaluated for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Authors:  Lise Reindal; Terje Nærland; Bernhard Weidle; Stian Lydersen; Ole A Andreassen; Anne Mari Sund
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-01-30

7.  The reach ratio--a new indicator for comparing quitline reach into smoking subgroups.

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; N Bruce Baskerville; Lynda M Hayward; K Stephen Brown; Deborah J Ossip
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  The validity of self-reported behaviors: methods for estimating underreporting of risk behaviors.

Authors:  Marlena S Norwood; James P Hughes; K Rivet Amico
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Use of diagnostic likelihood ratio of outcome to evaluate misclassification bias in the planning of database studies.

Authors:  Yoichi Ii; Shintaro Hiro; Yoshiomi Nakazuru
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Radial self-navigated native magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to navigator-gated contrast-enhanced MRA of the entire thoracic aorta in an aortic patient collective.

Authors:  Martina Correa Londono; Nino Trussardi; Verena C Obmann; Davide Piccini; Michael Ith; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Bernd Jung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.