Literature DB >> 19691015

Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.

Yan Lin1, Robert G Newcombe, Stuart Lipsitz, Rickey E Carter.   

Abstract

In studies in which a binary response for each subject is observed, the success probability and functions of this quantity are of interest. The use of confidence intervals has been increasingly encouraged as complementary to, and indeed preferable to, p-values as the primary expression of the impact of sampling uncertainty on the findings. The asymptotic confidence interval, based on a normal approximation, is often considered, but this interval can have poor statistical properties when the sample size is small and/or when the success probability is near 0 or 1. In this paper, an estimate of the risk difference based on median unbiased estimates (MUEs) of the two group probabilities is proposed. A corresponding confidence interval is derived using a fully specified bootstrap sample space. The proposed method is compared with Chen's quasi-exact method, Wald intervals and Agresti and Caffo's method with regard to mean square error and coverage probability. For a variety of settings, the MUE-based estimate of risk difference has mean square error uniformly smaller than maximum likelihood estimate within a certain range of risk difference. The fully specified bootstrap had better coverage probability in the tail area than Chen's quasi-exact method, Wald intervals and Agresti and Caffo's intervals. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691015     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  A Smooth Bootstrap Procedure towards Deriving Confidence Intervals for the Relative Risk.

Authors:  Dongliang Wang; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 0.893

2.  Smooth bootstrap-based confidence intervals for one binomial proportion and difference of two proportions.

Authors:  Dongliang Wang; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.404

3.  Relative risk estimated from the ratio of two median unbiased estimates.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; Yan Lin; Stuart R Lipsitz; Robert G Newcombe; Kathie L Hermayer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.

Authors:  Weizhen Wang; Guogen Shan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Mechanisms underlying genome instability mediated by formation of foldback inversions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bin-Zhong Li; Christopher D Putnam; Richard David Kolodner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.