Anne Marie Z Jukic1, Kristen Upson2, Quaker E Harmon2, Donna D Baird2. 1. Yale Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, New Haven, Connecticut; Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: annemarie.jukic@yale.edu. 2. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and menstrual cycle length and regularity. DESIGN: Community-based, cross-sectional study of serum 25(OH)D (adjusted for seasonal differences in timing of blood draw) and menstrual cycle length. Women aged 23-34 years reported their gynecologic history. Menstrual cycles were described with four independent categories (normal, short, long, irregular). We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate the association between a doubling of seasonally adjusted 25(OH)D and the odds of each cycle category. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,102 African American women. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported menstrual cycle length over the previous 12 months, excluding women who were using cycle-regulating medications over the entire year. Women who reported that their cycles were "too irregular to estimate" were classified as having irregular cycles. A typical cycle length of <27 days was considered "short," >34 days was "long," and 27-34 days was "normal." RESULT(S): The median 25(OH)D level was 14.7 ng/mL (interquartile range, 10.9-19.6 ng/mL). A doubling of 25(OH)D was associated with half the odds of having long menstrual cycles: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.89. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D was not associated with the occurrence of short (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29) or irregular (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.88-2.41) menstrual cycles. Results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION(S): These findings suggest that vitamin D status may influence the menstrual cycle and play a role in ovarian function. Further investigation of 25(OH)D and ovarian hormones, and prospective studies of 25(OH)D and cycle length, are needed.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and menstrual cycle length and regularity. DESIGN: Community-based, cross-sectional study of serum 25(OH)D (adjusted for seasonal differences in timing of blood draw) and menstrual cycle length. Women aged 23-34 years reported their gynecologic history. Menstrual cycles were described with four independent categories (normal, short, long, irregular). We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate the association between a doubling of seasonally adjusted 25(OH)D and the odds of each cycle category. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,102 African American women. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported menstrual cycle length over the previous 12 months, excluding women who were using cycle-regulating medications over the entire year. Women who reported that their cycles were "too irregular to estimate" were classified as having irregular cycles. A typical cycle length of <27 days was considered "short," >34 days was "long," and 27-34 days was "normal." RESULT(S): The median 25(OH)D level was 14.7 ng/mL (interquartile range, 10.9-19.6 ng/mL). A doubling of 25(OH)D was associated with half the odds of having long menstrual cycles: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.89. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D was not associated with the occurrence of short (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29) or irregular (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.88-2.41) menstrual cycles. Results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION(S): These findings suggest that vitamin D status may influence the menstrual cycle and play a role in ovarian function. Further investigation of 25(OH)D and ovarian hormones, and prospective studies of 25(OH)D and cycle length, are needed.
Authors: Amy E Millen; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Mary Pettinger; Michal L Melamed; Frances A Tylavsky; Simin Liu; John Robbins; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl S LeBoff; Rebecca D Jackson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Donna D Baird; Quaker E Harmon; Kristen Upson; Kristen R Moore; Christie Barker-Cummings; Susan Baker; Tracy Cooper; Ganesa Wegienka Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Anne Marie Z Jukic; Allen J Wilcox; D Robert McConnaughey; Clarice R Weinberg; Anne Z Steiner Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Huichu Li; Jaime E Hart; Shruthi Mahalingaiah; Rachel C Nethery; Trang VoPham; Elizabeth Bertone-Johnson; Francine Laden Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Q E Harmon; K Kissell; A M Z Jukic; K Kim; L Sjaarda; N J Perkins; D M Umbach; E F Schisterman; D D Baird; S L Mumford Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Kristen Upson; Quaker E Harmon; Renee Heffron; Janet E Hall; Lauren A Wise; Ganesa Wegienka; Erik J Tokar; Donna D Baird Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 9.031