Literature DB >> 26994660

Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.

Robin Gransier1, Hanne Deprez2, Michael Hofmann3, Marc Moonen4, Astrid van Wieringen3, Jan Wouters3.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that objective measures based on stimulation with low-rate pulse trains fail to predict the threshold levels of cochlear implant (CI) users for high-rate pulse trains, as used in clinical devices. Electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses (EASSRs) can be elicited by modulated high-rate pulse trains, and can potentially be used to objectively determine threshold levels of CI users. The responsiveness of the auditory pathway of profoundly hearing-impaired CI users to modulation frequencies is, however, not known. In the present study we investigated the responsiveness of the auditory pathway of CI users to a monopolar 500 pulses per second (pps) pulse train modulated between 1 and 100 Hz. EASSRs to forty-three modulation frequencies, elicited at the subject's maximum comfort level, were recorded by means of electroencephalography. Stimulation artifacts were removed by a linear interpolation between a pre- and post-stimulus sample (i.e., blanking). The phase delay across modulation frequencies was used to differentiate between the neural response and a possible residual stimulation artifact after blanking. Stimulation artifacts were longer than the inter-pulse interval of the 500pps pulse train for recording electrodes ipsilateral to the CI. As a result the stimulation artifacts could not be removed by artifact removal on the bases of linear interpolation for recording electrodes ipsilateral to the CI. However, artifact-free responses could be obtained in all subjects from recording electrodes contralateral to the CI, when subject specific reference electrodes (Cz or Fpz) were used. EASSRs to modulation frequencies within the 30-50 Hz range resulted in significant responses in all subjects. Only a small number of significant responses could be obtained, during a measurement period of 5 min, that originate from the brain stem (i.e., modulation frequencies in the 80-100 Hz range). This reduced synchronized activity of brain stem responses in long-term severely-hearing impaired CI users could be an attribute of processes associated with long-term hearing impairment and/or electrical stimulation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory pathway; Auditory steady-state response; Cochlear implant; Modulation frequency transfer function; Monopolar mode

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994660     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Vocal sequences suppress spiking in the bat auditory cortex while evoking concomitant steady-state local field potentials.

Authors:  Julio C Hechavarría; M Jerome Beetz; Silvio Macias; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  New metric for optimizing Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution (CLAD) sequences under the 1/f noise model.

Authors:  Xian Peng; Han Yuan; Wufan Chen; Tao Wang; Lei Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimating multiple latencies in the auditory system from auditory steady-state responses on a single EEG channel.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Elisabeth Noordanus; A John van Opstal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Stimulus-evoked phase-locked activity along the human auditory pathway strongly varies across individuals.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Michael Hofmann; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Franҫois Guérit; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-25

9.  The beta component of gamma-band auditory steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christoph Metzner; Volker Steuber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.