BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery, a significant question remains unanswered-What proportion of weight loss comes from each component and does this differ with time? Single anastomosis duodenal switch (LDS) combines a vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) with a loop attachment of the duodenal stump. There are two major variables the sleeve, and the intestine that processes ingested food. A comparison of patients that had a VSG with those that have had a LDS approximates the contribution of each component. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort analysis of VSG and LDS patients was obtained by matching every LDS patient to a VSG patient of the same sex and BMI. Excess weight lost percentage (%EWL) and the total weight loss percentage (%TWL) was analyzed. The data was compared through descriptive statistics and non-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Over 18 months, patients who received the LDS lost more %TWL and %EWL and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Additionally, with time, the difference became more profound. Weight loss stabilized at approximately 9-12 months and 15 to 18 for VSG and LDS patients', respectively. At 6 months post op, there was approximately 13 % difference in weight loss. This increased to 29 % difference at 18 months. CONCLUSION: LDS patients lose more weight than VSG. Preserving 3 m of intestinal length adds 30 % greater weight loss at 18 months. Early weight loss is similar between the two operations, while the intestinal component becomes more important with weight loss differentials increasing as time since surgery lengthens.
BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery, a significant question remains unanswered-What proportion of weight loss comes from each component and does this differ with time? Single anastomosis duodenal switch (LDS) combines a vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) with a loop attachment of the duodenal stump. There are two major variables the sleeve, and the intestine that processes ingested food. A comparison of patients that had a VSG with those that have had a LDS approximates the contribution of each component. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort analysis of VSG and LDS patients was obtained by matching every LDS patient to a VSG patient of the same sex and BMI. Excess weight lost percentage (%EWL) and the total weight loss percentage (%TWL) was analyzed. The data was compared through descriptive statistics and non-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Over 18 months, patients who received the LDS lost more %TWL and %EWL and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Additionally, with time, the difference became more profound. Weight loss stabilized at approximately 9-12 months and 15 to 18 for VSG and LDS patients', respectively. At 6 months post op, there was approximately 13 % difference in weight loss. This increased to 29 % difference at 18 months. CONCLUSION: LDS patients lose more weight than VSG. Preserving 3 m of intestinal length adds 30 % greater weight loss at 18 months. Early weight loss is similar between the two operations, while the intestinal component becomes more important with weight loss differentials increasing as time since surgery lengthens.
Authors: Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards; Samuel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: A Aslaner; A Öngen; M Koşar; T Çakır; B Mayir; U Doğan; U Gündüz; G Cantilav; M Habibi; Ş Özdemir; M T Oruç; N Bülbüller Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.507
Authors: Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Samuel Cottam; Amit Surve; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Benjamin Horsley; Daniel Cottam; Austin Cottam; Samuel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Walter Medlin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Wendy A Brown; Guillermo Ponce de Leon Ballesteros; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Antonio Torres; Scott Shikora; Lilian Kow; Miguel F Herrera Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Amit Surve; Ravi Rao; Daniel Cottam; Aditya Rao; Leila Ide; Samuel Cottam; Benjamin Horsley Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Daniel Cottam; Austin Cottam; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards; LeGrand Belnap; Samuel Cottam; Benjamin Horsley Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Austin Cottam; Daniel Cottam; Dana Portenier; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Samuel Cottam; Legrand Belnap; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.129