BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery, the procedure with the highest average weight loss is the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS). A new simplified duodenal switch called the stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery with less malabsorption and one fewer anastomosis claims to have similar outcomes when compared to the BPDDS. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort analysis of SIPS versus BPDDS patients in a single private practice was obtained by matching every BPDDS to a SIPS patient of the same gender and BMI. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL), BMI, and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) were compared. Additionally, comorbidity resolution, nutritional data, and complications were also compared. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Over 2 years, there was no statistical difference in weight loss between BPDDS and SIPS. There also was no difference in nutritional data between the two procedures pre- and post-op. Complication rates were lower in SIPS however, due to the small sample sizes this is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Weight loss and nutritional results between SIPS and BPDDS are similar at 2 years. However, there are fewer complications with SIPS.
BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery, the procedure with the highest average weight loss is the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS). A new simplified duodenal switch called the stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery with less malabsorption and one fewer anastomosis claims to have similar outcomes when compared to the BPDDS. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort analysis of SIPS versus BPDDSpatients in a single private practice was obtained by matching every BPDDS to a SIPS patient of the same gender and BMI. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL), BMI, and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) were compared. Additionally, comorbidity resolution, nutritional data, and complications were also compared. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Over 2 years, there was no statistical difference in weight loss between BPDDS and SIPS. There also was no difference in nutritional data between the two procedures pre- and post-op. Complication rates were lower in SIPS however, due to the small sample sizes this is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:Weight loss and nutritional results between SIPS and BPDDS are similar at 2 years. However, there are fewer complications with SIPS.
Authors: Philip N Okafor; Chueh Lien; Sigrid Bairdain; Donald C Simonson; Florencia Halperin; Ashley H Vernon; Bradley C Linden; David B Lautz Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Hilde Risstad; Torgeir T Søvik; My Engström; Erlend T Aasheim; Morten W Fagerland; Monika Fagevik Olsén; Jon A Kristinsson; Carel W le Roux; Thomas Bøhmer; Kåre I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Guilherme M Campos; Charlotte Rabl; Kathleen Mulligan; Andrew Posselt; Stanley J Rogers; Antonio C Westphalen; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2008-09
Authors: Brian Mitzman; Daniel Cottam; Richie Goriparthi; Samuel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Mitchell S Roslin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Daniel Cottam; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards; Austin Cottam; Samuel Cottam Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Benjamin Horsley; Daniel Cottam; Austin Cottam; Samuel Cottam; Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Walter Medlin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Wendy A Brown; Guillermo Ponce de Leon Ballesteros; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Antonio Torres; Scott Shikora; Lilian Kow; Miguel F Herrera Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Amit Surve; Ravi Rao; Daniel Cottam; Aditya Rao; Leila Ide; Samuel Cottam; Benjamin Horsley Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Romulo P Lind; Muhammad Ghanem; Andre F Teixeira; Muhammad A Jawad; Javier Osorio; Claudio Lazzara; Lucia Sobrino; David Ortiz-Ciruela; Amador Garcia Ruiz de Gordejuela Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-10-24 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Hinali Zaveri; Amit Surve; Daniel Cottam; Peter C Ng; Paul Enochs; Helmuth Billy; Walter Medlin; Christina Richards; LeGrand Belnap; Lindsey S Sharp; Dustin M Bermudez; Ryan Fairley; Tricia A Burns; Krista Herrell; Jaime Bull; Sophia E Menozzi; John Ambrose Student Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Bo T Neichoy; Bleu Schniederjan; Daniel R Cottam; Amit K Surve; Hinali M Zaveri; Austin Cottam; Samuel Cottam Journal: JSLS Date: 2018 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.172