| Literature DB >> 26992395 |
Lisa G Johnston1,2, Avi J Hakim3, Samantha Dittrich3, Janet Burnett3, Evelyn Kim3, Richard G White4.
Abstract
Reporting key details of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) survey implementation and analysis is essential for assessing the quality of RDS surveys. RDS is both a recruitment and analytic method and, as such, it is important to adequately describe both aspects in publications. We extracted data from peer-reviewed literature published through September, 2013 that reported collected biological specimens using RDS. We identified 151 eligible peer-reviewed articles describing 222 surveys conducted in seven regions throughout the world. Most published surveys reported basic implementation information such as survey city, country, year, population sampled, interview method, and final sample size. However, many surveys did not report essential methodological and analytical information for assessing RDS survey quality, including number of recruitment sites, seeds at start and end, maximum number of waves, and whether data were adjusted for network size. Understanding the quality of data collection and analysis in RDS is useful for effectively planning public health service delivery and funding priorities.Entities:
Keywords: Biological and behavioral surveillance; HIV/AIDS; Key populations; RDS; Respondent driven sampling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26992395 PMCID: PMC6620785 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1346-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165