Literature DB >> 30929151

Implementing Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit Women Who Exchange Sex in New York City: Factors Associated with Recruitment and Lessons Learned.

Sidney A Carrillo1, Alexis V Rivera2, Sarah L Braunstein2.   

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) relies on productive peer recruitment to capture hidden populations. Domestic studies have identified characteristics of productive recruitment among RDS samples of men who have sex with men and persons who use drugs, but not of women who exchange sex, a group vulnerable to HIV infection. We examined sociodemographic-, behavioral-, exchange-sex-, and protocol-related factors associated with recruitment among seeds (n = 25) and peers (n = 297) in the 2016 New York City National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Study cycle focused on women who exchange sex. Recruiter productivity was significantly associated with not having been recently incarcerated, lower rate of HIV testing, and larger exchange sex networks among seeds, and with HIV-prevention services usage among peers. We describe challenges and lessons learned from implementing RDS in this population. Our study identifies seed characteristics and protocol improvements researchers can utilize when implementing future RDS studies among women who exchange sex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exchange sex; HIV; Recruitment; Respondent-driven sampling; USA

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30929151      PMCID: PMC8201473          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02485-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  35 in total

Review 1.  Sex work research: methodological and ethical challenges.

Authors:  Frances M Shaver
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  Using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance in international settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohsen Malekinejad; Lisa Grazina Johnston; Carl Kendall; Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr; Marina Raven Rifkin; George W Rutherford
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

3.  What makes a respondent-driven sampling "seed" productive? Example of finding at-risk Massachusetts men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Matthew J Mimiaga; Carey V Johnson; Sean Bland; Patricia Case; Steven A Safren; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Individual and structural vulnerability among female youth who exchange sex for survival.

Authors:  Cari L Miller; Sarah J Fielden; Mark W Tyndall; Ruth Zhang; Kate Gibson; Kate Shannon
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Assessment of respondent driven sampling for recruiting female sex workers in two Vietnamese cities: reaching the unseen sex worker.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Keith Sabin; Thu Hien Mai; Thi Huong Pham
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Exchange Sex and HIV Infection Among Women Who Inject Drugs-20 US Cities, 2009.

Authors:  Lina M Nerlander; Kristen L Hess; Charles E Rose; Catlainn Sionean; Anna Thorson; Dita Broz; Gabriela Paz-Bailey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Evaluating outcome-correlated recruitment and geographic recruitment bias in a respondent-driven sample of people who inject drugs in Tijuana, Mexico.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; Tommi L Gaines; Remedios Lozada; Alicia Vera; Kimberly C Brouwer
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-12

8.  Using respondent-driven sampling in a hidden population at risk of HIV infection: who do HIV-positive recruiters recruit?

Authors:  Daniela Abramovitz; Erik M Volz; Steffanie A Strathdee; Thomas L Patterson; Alicia Vera; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Challenges to recruiting population representative samples of female sex workers in China using Respondent Driven Sampling.

Authors:  M Giovanna Merli; James Moody; Jeffrey Smith; Jing Li; Sharon Weir; Xiangsheng Chen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Understanding recruitment: outcomes associated with alternate methods for seed selection in respondent driven sampling.

Authors:  John L Wylie; Ann M Jolly
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Employing Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) to recruit people who inject drugs (PWID) and other hard-to-reach populations during COVID-19: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Roberto Abadie; Patrick Habecker; Kimberly Gocchi Carrasco; Kathy S Chiou; Samodha Fernando; Sydney J Bennett; Aníbal Valentin-Acevedo; Kirk Dombrowski; John T West; Charles Wood
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.435

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.