Elaine Wittenberg1, Joy Goldsmith2, Betty Ferrell3, Sandra L Ragan4. 1. City of Hope, Nursing Research and Education, Duarte, CA, 91010, United States. 2. University of Memphis-Department of Communication, Memphis, TN, 38152, United States. 3. City of Hope, Nursing Research, Duarte, CA, 91010, United States. 4. University of Oklahoma, Department of Communication, Norman, OK, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Family caregivers of cancer patients have a vital role in facilitating and sharing information about cancer, revealing a need to develop caregiver health literacy skills to support caregiver communication. The goal of this study was to investigate caregiver print materials and develop and assess a new caregiver communication resource titled A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM . METHODS: Using a model of six domains of caregiver health literacy skills, print cancer education materials were collected and evaluated for caregiver communication support. A new caregiver communication resource was also developed and assessed by caregivers and healthcare providers. Caregivers reviewed content and assessed utility, relatability, and reading quality. Healthcare providers also assessed whether the material would be understandable and usable for cancer caregivers. RESULTS: Only three of the 28 print materials evaluated were written at the recommended sixth grade reading level and only five addressed all six caregiver health literacy skills. Readability scores for A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM were at the sixth grade level, and caregivers reported its contents were relatable, useful, and easy to read. Healthcare providers also rated the material as easy for patient/family members of diverse backgrounds and varying levels of literacy to understand and use. CONCLUSIONS: Existing print-based caregiver education materials do not address caregivers' health literacy skill needs and are aimed at a highly literate caregiving population. A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM meets health literacy standards and family caregiver and provider communication needs. The findings are relevant for healthcare professionals who provide cancer education.
OBJECTIVES: Family caregivers of cancerpatients have a vital role in facilitating and sharing information about cancer, revealing a need to develop caregiver health literacy skills to support caregiver communication. The goal of this study was to investigate caregiver print materials and develop and assess a new caregiver communication resource titled A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM . METHODS: Using a model of six domains of caregiver health literacy skills, print cancer education materials were collected and evaluated for caregiver communication support. A new caregiver communication resource was also developed and assessed by caregivers and healthcare providers. Caregivers reviewed content and assessed utility, relatability, and reading quality. Healthcare providers also assessed whether the material would be understandable and usable for cancer caregivers. RESULTS: Only three of the 28 print materials evaluated were written at the recommended sixth grade reading level and only five addressed all six caregiver health literacy skills. Readability scores for A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM were at the sixth grade level, and caregivers reported its contents were relatable, useful, and easy to read. Healthcare providers also rated the material as easy for patient/family members of diverse backgrounds and varying levels of literacy to understand and use. CONCLUSIONS: Existing print-based caregiver education materials do not address caregivers' health literacy skill needs and are aimed at a highly literate caregiving population. A Communication Guide for CaregiversTM meets health literacy standards and family caregiver and provider communication needs. The findings are relevant for healthcare professionals who provide cancer education.
Authors: Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; So Young Kim; Ik Joo Chung; Sam Soo Kim; Hyung Kook Yang; Eunmi Ahn; Bo Ram Park; Hongwan Seo; Jong-Hyock Park Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: John J You; James Downar; Robert A Fowler; François Lamontagne; Irene W Y Ma; Dev Jayaraman; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Patricia H Strachan; Roy Ilan; Aman P Nijjar; John Neary; John Shik; Kevin Brazil; Amen Patel; Kim Wiebe; Martin Albert; Anita Palepu; Elysée Nouvet; Amanda Roze des Ordons; Nishan Sharma; Amane Abdul-Razzak; Xuran Jiang; Andrew Day; Daren K Heyland Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Adam Walczak; Inge Henselmans; Martin H N Tattersall; Josephine M Clayton; Patricia M Davidson; Jane Young; Frances A Bellemore; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Erin L Mead; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Sara H Javid; Emily A Haozous; Lori Arviso Alvord; David R Flum; Arden M Morris Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sarah Iribarren; Samantha Stonbraker; Niurka Suero-Tejeda; Maribel Granja; José A Luchsinger; Mary Mittelman; Suzanne Bakken; Robert Lucero Journal: Inform Health Soc Care Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 2.439
Authors: Leena Nahata; Antoinette Anazodo; Brooke Cherven; Shanna Logan; Lillian R Meacham; Cathy D Meade; Sara Zarnegar-Lumley; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Andreia Costa; David de Sousa Loura; Paulo Nogueira; Graça Melo; Idalina Gomes; Isabel Ferraz; Laura Viegas; Maria Adriana Henriques Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) Date: 2022-09-06