Literature DB >> 25099223

Discordance among patient preferences, caregiver preferences, and caregiver predictions of patient preferences regarding disclosure of terminal status and end-of-life choices.

Dong Wook Shin1, Juhee Cho, So Young Kim, Ik Joo Chung, Sam Soo Kim, Hyung Kook Yang, Eunmi Ahn, Bo Ram Park, Hongwan Seo, Jong-Hyock Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complexity of end-of-life (EOL) communication in cancer care is often increased by family caregivers, who frequently affect the information and decision-making process. We assessed cancer patient preferences (PP), family caregiver preferences (FCP), and family caregiver predictions of patient preferences (FCPPP) regarding the disclosure of terminal status, family involvement in the disclosure process, and EOL choices, and we evaluated the concordances among them.
METHODS: A national, multicenter, cross-sectional survey of 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate = 76.2%) was performed. A set of paired questionnaires was independently administered to patients and their caregivers.
RESULTS: While patients and family caregivers had wide spectra of preferences, patients significantly preferred disclosure, direct disclosure by a physician, and palliative care options (all P < 0.001). Family caregiver predictions were similar to PP with regard to terminal disclosure (P = 0.35) but significantly different with regard to family involvement in the disclosure process and EOL choices (P < 0.001). The concordances of PP and FCP (κ = 0.08-0.13), and those of PP and FCPPP (κ = 0.09-0.17), were poor. The concordances of FCP and FCPPP were fair to moderate (κ = 0.35-0.67). Discrepancies between PP and FCP and between PP and FCPPP were associated with dysfunctional family communication.
CONCLUSIONS: Family caregivers do not generally concur with patients in their preferences, nor do they reliably predict PP. Open dialogue between patient and family caregivers would reduce the discrepancy. More emphasis on incorporating family caregivers in EOL communication is needed from clinical, research, and training perspectives.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; caregiver; communication; concordance; disclosure; family; oncology; palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25099223     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  13 in total

1.  Prognostic awareness and communication preferences among caregivers of patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  A J Applebaum; K Buda; M Kryza-Lacombe; J J Buthorn; R Walker; K M Shaffer; T A D'Agostino; E L Diamond
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Promoting improved family caregiver health literacy: evaluation of caregiver communication resources.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg; Joy Goldsmith; Betty Ferrell; Sandra L Ragan
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  "My Family Wants Something Different": Discordance in Perceived Personal and Family Treatment Preference and Its Association With Do-Not-Resuscitate Order Placement.

Authors:  Login S George; William Breitbart; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Communication between Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Relationship with Caregiver Burden and Preparedness for Caregiving.

Authors:  Amy K Otto; Dana Ketcher; Richard E Heyman; Susan T Vadaparampil; Lee Ellington; Maija Reblin
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2020-01-08

5.  Patient and carer experiences of clinical uncertainty and deterioration, in the face of limited reversibility: A comparative observational study of the AMBER care bundle.

Authors:  Katherine Bristowe; Irene Carey; Adrian Hopper; Susanna Shouls; Wendy Prentice; Ruth Caulkin; Irene J Higginson; Jonathan Koffman
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Do Cancer Patients Prefer to Know the Diagnosis? A Descriptive Study Among Iranian Patients.

Authors:  Seyed Mehdi Samimi Ardestani; Farhad Faridhosseini; Fatemeh Shirkhani; Ardeshir Karamad; Layla Farid; Mohammad Reza Fayyazi Bordbar; Ali Motlagh
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci       Date:  2015-12-23

7.  The Me in We dyadic communication intervention is feasible and acceptable among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Dana Ketcher; Casidee Thompson; Amy K Otto; Maija Reblin; Kristin G Cloyes; Margaret F Clayton; Brian R W Baucom; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Prognostic Awareness in Caregivers of Patients with Incurable Cancer.

Authors:  Tamryn F Gray; Deborah Forst; Ryan D Nipp; Joseph A Greer; Jennifer S Temel; Areej El-Jawahri
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Impact of family caregivers' awareness of the prognosis on their quality of life/depression and those of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  EunKyo Kang; Bhumsuk Keam; Na-Ri Lee; Jung Hun Kang; Yu Jung Kim; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Kyung Hae Jung; Su-Jin Koh; Hyewon Ryu; Jihye Lee; Jiyeon Choo; Shin Hye Yoo; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Influence of Socioeconomic Status, Comorbidity, and Disability on Late-stage Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Bo Ram Park; So Young Kim; Dong Wook Shin; Hyung Kook Yang; Jong Hyock Park
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.