| Literature DB >> 26989692 |
Do Phuc Nguyen1, Thi Anh Dao Nguyen1, Thi Hien Le1, Nguyen Minh Doan Tran1, Thanh Phong Ngo1, Van Chinh Dang1, Takao Kawai2, Masashi Kanki2, Ryuji Kawahara2, Michio Jinnai2, Shinya Yonogi2, Yuji Hirai2, Yoshimasa Yamamoto3, Yuko Kumeda2.
Abstract
To investigate the dissemination of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli within the food distribution system of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam, the prevalence of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli strains in chicken meat, pork, beef, and fish/shrimp samples obtained from slaughterhouses, a wholesale market, and supermarkets was examined. Among the total of 330 collected food samples, ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli was detected in 150 samples (45.5%). The highest prevalence of these isolates was in chicken meat (76/82, 92.7%), followed by pork (32/92, 34.8%), beef (18/74, 34.3%), and fish/shrimp (24/82, 29.3%). A total of 342 strains of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli were isolated from 150 positive food samples. The most prevalent genes responsible for ESBL or pAmpC activity belonged to the CTX-M-9 (110/342, 31.2%), CTX-M-1 (102/342, 29.8%), and CIT (118/342, 34.5%) groups. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the high occurrence of pAmpC (37.1%) in animal-based food in Vietnam. Among the 342 total ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli isolates, 276 (80.7%) were resistant to at least 6 antibiotic agents. Notably, high percentages of resistance to ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin were found in isolates from chicken (80.5% and 50.8%, resp.). These findings demonstrate that animal-based food products in HCMC represent a major reservoir of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26989692 PMCID: PMC4773546 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8182096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-E. coli in food obtained from slaughterhouses or a wholesale market and supermarkets (2012 October–2014 March).
| Food | Place | Number of samples | ESBL/AmpC- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive |
| ORb, CIc | |||
| Chicken | 82 | 76 (92.7%) | |||
| Slaughterhouse | 40 | 40 (100%) |
| OR = 14.42 | |
| Supermarket | 42 | 36 (85.7%) | CI (0.78–265.07) | ||
|
| |||||
| Pork | 92 | 32 (34.8%) | |||
| Slaughterhouse | 50 | 11 (22.0%) |
| OR = 0.28 | |
| Supermarket | 42 | 21 (50.0%) | CI (0.11–0.70) | ||
|
| |||||
| Beef | 74 | 18 (34.3%) | |||
| Slaughterhouse | 30 | 0 (0%) |
| OR = 0.02 | |
| Supermarket | 44 | 18 (40.9%) | CI (0.00–0.41) | ||
|
| |||||
| Fish | 82 | 24 (29.3%) | |||
| Wholesale market | 40 | 13 (32.5%) |
| OR = 1.36 | |
| Supermarket | 42 | 11 (26.2%) | CI (0.52–3.52) | ||
|
| |||||
| Total | 330 | 150 (45.5%) | |||
aFisher's exact test.
bOdds ratio.
c95% confidence interval.
Distribution of β-lactamase genes in ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli isolates (n = 342) from food.
| Food | Sampling place | Number of isolates | ESBL genes | pAmpC genes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTX-M-9 group | CTX-M-1 group | SHV12 | CIT group | DHA | |||||||||
| − | +TEMa | − | +TEMa | +CIT group | − | +TEMb | − | +TEMa | − | +TEMa | |||
| Chicken | 185 | 44 (23.8%) | 62 (33.5%) | 1 (0.5%) | 77 (41.6%) | 1 (0.5%) | |||||||
| Slaughterhouse | 111 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 1 | 0 | |
| Supermarkets | 73 | 5 | 14 | 8 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Pork | 75 | 41 (54.7%) | 15 (20.0%) | 0 (0%) | 19 (25.3%) | 0 (0%) | |||||||
| Slaughterhouse | 31 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| Supermarkets | 44 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Beef | 38 | 12 (31.6%) | 10 (26.3%) | 2 (3.4%) | 14 (36.8%) | 0 (0%) | |||||||
| Slaughterhouse | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Supermarkets | 38 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Fish | 44 | 13 (29.5%) | 15 (34.1%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (18.2%) | 8 (18.2%) | |||||||
| Wholesale market | 24 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| Supermarkets | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Total (number of isolates) | 342 | 110 (31.2%) | 102 (29.8%) | 3 (0.9%) | 118 (34.5%) | 9 (2.6%) | |||||||
a10 tested isolates harbored TEM-1 gene.
bOne isolate harbored TEM-135 gene.
Figure 1Phylogenetic group distribution of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli from food (n = 342).
Antibiotic resistance profiles of ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli isolates from food (n = 324).
| Chicken | Pork | Beef | Fish | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin (AMP) | 185 (100) | 75 (100) | 38 (100) | 44 (100) | 342 (100) |
| Cefoxitin (CFX) | 84 (45.4) | 19 (25.3) | 14 (36.8) | 15 (34.1) | 132 (38.6) |
| Cefotaxime (CTX) | 166 (89.7) | 68 (90.7) | 33 (86.8) | 36 (81.8) | 303 (88.6) |
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | 54 (29.2) | 10 (13.3) | 8 (21.1) | 12 (27.3) | 84 (24.6) |
| Meropenem (MEM) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Nalidixic acid (NA) | 170 (91.9) | 47 (62.7) | 25 (65.8) | 33 (75.0) | 275 (80.4) |
| Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) | 149 (80.5) | 32 (42.7) | 15 (39.5) | 30 (68.2) | 226 (66.1) |
| Streptomycin (SM) | 176 (95.1) | 52 (69.3) | 32 (84.2) | 37 (84.1) | 285 (83.3) |
| Kanamycin (KM) | 127 (68.6) | 32 (42.7) | 6 (15.8) | 20 (45.5) | 185 (54.1) |
| Gentamicin (GM) | 109 (58.9) | 44 (58.7) | 11 (28.9) | 14 (31.8) | 175 (52.0) |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (ST) | 164 (88.7) | 52 (69.3) | 32 (84.2) | 38 (86.4) | 286 (83.6) |
| Tetracycline (TC) | 176 (95.1) | 71 (94.7) | 37 (97.3) | 39 (88.6) | 323 (94.4) |
| Chloramphenicol (CP) | 156 (84.3) | 61 (81.3) | 27 (71.1) | 27 (61.4) | 271 (79.2) |
| Fosfomycin (FOM) | 94 (50.8) | 10 (13.3) | 0 (0) | 9 (20.5) | 113 (33.0) |
Figure 2Multidrug-resistance distribution among food isolates of ESBL/pAmpC-producing E. coli (n = 342).
Figure 3PFGE patterns of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from meat samples in supermarkets. Lanes: 1, E. coli isolate from chicken sample collected from a supermarket located in district 10; M, Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 (a size marker); 2, E. coli isolate from a pork block sample; 3, E. coli isolate from ground pork sample; 4, E. coli isolate from a beef block sample; 5, E. coli isolate from ground beef sample; 2–5, isolates from samples collected from the same supermarket located in district 7 on the same day.