Literature DB >> 26988980

A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.

Rachel H DeMeester1,2, Fanny Y Lopez1, Jennifer E Moore3,4, Scott C Cook1,2, Marshall H Chin5,6.   

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) occurs when patients and clinicians work together to reach care decisions that are both medically sound and responsive to patients' preferences and values. SDM is an important tenet of patient-centered care that can improve patient outcomes. Patients with multiple minority identities, such as sexual orientation and race/ethnicity, are at particular risk for poor SDM. Among these dual-minority patients, added challenges to clear and open communication include cultural barriers, distrust, and a health care provider's lack of awareness of the patient's minority sexual orientation or gender identity. However, organizational factors like a culture of inclusion and private space throughout the visit can improve SDM with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ("LGBT") racial/ethnic minority patients who have faced stigma and discrimination. Most models of shared decision making focus on the patient-provider interaction, but the health care organization's context is also critical. Context-an organization's structure and operations-can strongly influence the ability and willingness of patients and clinicians to engage in shared decision making. SDM is most likely to be optimal if organizations transform their contexts and patients and providers improve their communication. Thus, we propose a conceptual model that suggests ways in which organizations can shape their contextual structure and operations to support SDM. The model contains six drivers: workflows, health information technology, organizational structure and culture, resources and clinic environment, training and education, and incentives and disincentives. These drivers work through four mechanisms to impact care: continuity and coordination, the ease of SDM, knowledge and skills, and attitudes and beliefs. These mechanisms can activate clinicians and patients to engage in high-quality SDM. We provide examples of how specific contextual changes could make SDM more effective for LGBT racial/ethnic minority populations, focusing especially on transformations that would establish a safe environment, build trust, and decrease stigma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bisexual; disparities; gay; lesbian; practice redesign; race and ethnicity; shared decision making; transgender

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26988980      PMCID: PMC4870417          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3608-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  86 in total

Review 1.  Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? A review and conceptual model.

Authors:  C Brach; I Fraser
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  Culturally competent healthcare systems. A systematic review.

Authors:  Laurie M Anderson; Susan C Scrimshaw; Mindy T Fullilove; Jonathan E Fielding; Jacques Normand
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The impact of health information technology on collaborative chronic care management.

Authors:  Janet M Marchibroda
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2008-03

4.  Effectiveness of stroke education in the emergency department waiting room.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Yvonne Chan; Roxanne Nagurka; Lynne D Richardson; Sergey B Zaets; Michael B Brimacombe; Steven R Levine
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Expanding the roles of medical assistants: who does what in primary care?

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Rachel Willard-Grace; Amireh Ghorob
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Shared decision making in cancer screening and treatment decisions for American Indian and Alaska native communities: can we ethically calibrate interventions to patients' values?

Authors:  Katherine E Nowakowski; Jon C Tilburt; Judith S Kaur
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The business case for quality: economic analysis of the Michigan Keystone Patient Safety Program in ICUs.

Authors:  Hugh R Waters; Roy Korn; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Sean M Berenholtz; Christine A Goeschel; Dale M Needham; Julius C Pham; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Sam R Watson; Patricia Posa; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Shared decision making: using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care.

Authors:  J B Jones; Christa A Bruce; Nirav R Shah; William F Taylor; Walter F Stewart
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Internet access and electronic communication among families in an urban pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Mohsen Saidinejad; Stephen J Teach; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.454

Review 10.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation Among Sexual Orientation Identity and Racial/Ethnic Subgroups of Black and White U.S. Women and Girls: An Intersectional Analysis.

Authors:  Madina Agénor; Ashley E Pérez; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Jennifer Potter; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Improving Shared Decision Making with LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin; Fanny Y Lopez; Aviva G Nathan; Scott C Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Shared Decision Making Among Clinicians and Asian American and Pacific Islander Sexual and Gender Minorities: An Intersectional Approach to Address a Critical Care Gap.

Authors:  Judy Y Tan; Lucy J Xu; Fanny Y Lopez; Justin L Jia; Mai T Pho; Karen E Kim; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.151

Review 4.  Use of Decision Aids with Minority Patients: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aviva G Nathan; Imani M Marshall; Jennifer M Cooper; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Movement Advocacy, Personal Relationships, and Ending Health Care Disparities.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  High Stakes for the Health of Sexual and Gender Minority Patients of Color.

Authors:  Judy Y Tan; Arshiya A Baig; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Addressing Barriers to Shared Decision Making Among Latino LGBTQ Patients and Healthcare Providers in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Fanny Y Lopez; Rachel H DeMeester; Justin L Jia; Monica E Peek; Monica B Vela
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.151

8.  Healthcare Experiences of Transgender People of Color.

Authors:  Susanna D Howard; Kevin L Lee; Aviva G Nathan; Hannah C Wenger; Marshall H Chin; Scott C Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Fanny Y Lopez; H Sharif Williams; Lucy J Xu; Moira C McNulty; M Ellen Acree; John A Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Improving Shared Decision Making For Asian American Pacific Islander Sexual and Gender Minorities.

Authors:  Stephanie Bi; Kathryn E Gunter; Fanny Y López; Seeba Anam; Judy Y Tan; Danielle J Polin; Justin L Jia; Lucy J Xu; Neda Laiteerapong; Mai T Pho; Karen E Kim; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.