Literature DB >> 18331114

The impact of health information technology on collaborative chronic care management.

Janet M Marchibroda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic disease is a growing problem in the United States. More than 125 million Americans had at least 1 chronic care condition in 2000, and this number is expected to grow to 157 million by the year 2020.1 Some of the challenges associated with current chronic care management approaches can be addressed through the use of health information technology (IT) and health information exchange.
OBJECTIVE: To review the current challenges of chronic care management and explore how health IT and health information exchange efforts at the national, state, and local levels can be leveraged to address some of these challenges.
SUMMARY: Efforts to effectively manage chronic care have been hampered by a number of factors, including a fragmented health care system and the need for more coordination across the health care setting; the lack of interoperable clinical information systems, which would help provide readily available, comprehensive information about the patient to those who deliver care, those who manage care, and those who receive care, and finally, the current predominantly fee-for-service reimbursement system that rewards volume and fragmentation, and does not effectively align incentives with the goals of chronic care management. The introduction of health IT, including electronic health records and health information exchange, holds great promise for addressing many of the barriers to effective chronic care management, by providing important clinical information about the patient when it is needed, and where it is needed, in a timely, secure fashion. Having information from the care delivery process readily available through health IT and health information exchange at the national, state, and local levels supports key components of the chronic care management process, including those related to measurement, clinical decision support, collaboration and coordination, and consumer activation.
CONCLUSIONS: Those engaged in chronic care management should seek to leverage health IT and health information exchange initiatives particularly at the local levels. Community-based initiatives have built social capital and trust across multiple stakeholders; enabled access to clinical data derived from the care delivery process that only resides locally; and in many cases aligned incentives around the mobilization of clinical information across care settings. All of these elements are critical to the long-term success of chronic care management. While there is good research regarding interdisciplinary care models, more research is still needed to identify policies, practices, and strategies for facilitating and building cooperation among those engaged in chronic care management, and those engaged in multi-stakeholder efforts involved in the exchange of clinical health information electronically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  23 in total

1.  Race and medication adherence and glycemic control: findings from an operational health information exchange.

Authors:  Vivienne J Zhu; Wanzhu Tu; David G Marrero; Marc B Rosenman; J Marc Overhage
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  A Clinical Support System Based on Quality of Life Estimation.

Authors:  Brígida Mónica Faria; Joaquim Gonçalves; Luis Paulo Reis; Álvaro Rocha
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes.

Authors:  A Hincapie; T Warholak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Use of an automated clinical management system improves outpatient immunosuppressive care following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Esther S Park; Marie R Peccoud; Kay A Wicks; Jeffrey B Halldorson; Robert L Carithers; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Methodological issues in monitoring health services and outcomes for stroke survivors: a case study.

Authors:  Mary Stuart; Donato Papini; Francesco Benvenuti; Marco Nerattini; Enrico Roccato; Velio Macellari; Steven Stanhope; Richard Macko; Michael Weinrich
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.554

6.  Facilitating Clinical Research through the Health Information Exchange: Lipid Control as an Example.

Authors:  Vivienne J Zhu; Wanzhu Tu; Marc B Rosenman; J Marc Overhage
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

7.  Perceptions of factors influencing use of an electronic record for case management of persons living with HIV.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Peter Gordon; Eli Camhi; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2011-03

8.  A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.

Authors:  Rachel H DeMeester; Fanny Y Lopez; Jennifer E Moore; Scott C Cook; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Interventions to Address Medical Conditions and Health-Risk Behaviors Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Emma E McGinty; Julia Baller; Susan T Azrin; Denise Juliano-Bult; Gail L Daumit
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  An implementation model for managing cloud-based longitudinal care plans for children with medical complexity.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Julia Wignall; Dylan Kinard; Vidhi Singh; Carolyn Foster; Sherri Adams; Wanda Pratt; Arti D Desai
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.