BACKGROUND: The impact that the absence of expression of NeuGc in pigs might have on pig organ or cell transplantation in humans has been studied in vitro, but only using red blood cells (pRBCs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (pPBMCs) as the target cells for immune assays. We have extended this work in various in vitro models and now report our initial results. METHODS: The models we have used involve GTKO/hCD46 and GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKO pig aortas and corneas, and pRBCs, pPBMCs, aortic endothelial cells (pAECs), corneal endothelial cells (pCECs), and isolated pancreatic islets. We have investigated the effect of the absence of NeuGc expression on (i) human IgM and IgG binding, (ii) the T-cell proliferative response, (iii) human platelet aggregation, and (iv) in an in vitro assay of the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) following exposure of pig islets to human blood/serum. RESULTS: The lack of expression of NeuGc on some pig tissues (aortas, corneas) and cells (RBCs, PBMCs, AECs) significantly reduces the extent of human antibody binding. In contrast, the absence of NeuGc expression on some pig tissues (CECs, isolated islet cells) does not reduce human antibody binding, possibly due to their relatively low NeuGc expression level. The strength of the human T-cell proliferative response may also be marginally reduced, but is already weak to GTKO/hCD46 pAECs and islet cells. We also demonstrate that the absence of NeuGc expression on GTKO/hCD46 pAECs does not reduce human platelet aggregation, and nor does it significantly modify the IBMIR to pig islets. CONCLUSION: The absence of NeuGc on some solid organs from GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKO pigs should reduce the human antibody response after clinical transplantation when compared to GTKO/hCD46 pig organs. However, the clinical benefit of using certain tissue (e.g., cornea, islets) from GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKO pigs is questionable.
BACKGROUND: The impact that the absence of expression of NeuGc in pigs might have on pig organ or cell transplantation in humans has been studied in vitro, but only using red blood cells (pRBCs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (pPBMCs) as the target cells for immune assays. We have extended this work in various in vitro models and now report our initial results. METHODS: The models we have used involve GTKO/hCD46 and GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKOpig aortas and corneas, and pRBCs, pPBMCs, aortic endothelial cells (pAECs), corneal endothelial cells (pCECs), and isolated pancreatic islets. We have investigated the effect of the absence of NeuGc expression on (i) human IgM and IgG binding, (ii) the T-cell proliferative response, (iii) humanplatelet aggregation, and (iv) in an in vitro assay of the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) following exposure of pig islets to human blood/serum. RESULTS: The lack of expression of NeuGc on some pig tissues (aortas, corneas) and cells (RBCs, PBMCs, AECs) significantly reduces the extent of human antibody binding. In contrast, the absence of NeuGc expression on some pig tissues (CECs, isolated islet cells) does not reduce human antibody binding, possibly due to their relatively low NeuGc expression level. The strength of the human T-cell proliferative response may also be marginally reduced, but is already weak to GTKO/hCD46 pAECs and islet cells. We also demonstrate that the absence of NeuGc expression on GTKO/hCD46 pAECs does not reduce humanplatelet aggregation, and nor does it significantly modify the IBMIR to pig islets. CONCLUSION: The absence of NeuGc on some solid organs from GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKOpigs should reduce the human antibody response after clinical transplantation when compared to GTKO/hCD46pig organs. However, the clinical benefit of using certain tissue (e.g., cornea, islets) from GTKO/hCD46/NeuGcKOpigs is questionable.
Authors: Jose L Estrada; Greg Martens; Ping Li; Andrew Adams; Kenneth A Newell; Mandy L Ford; James R Butler; Richard Sidner; Matt Tector; Joseph Tector Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Agnes M Azimzadeh; Sean S Kelishadi; Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Avneesh K Singh; Tiffany Stoddard; Hayato Iwase; Tianshu Zhang; Lars Burdorf; Evelyn Sievert; Chris Avon; Xiangfei Cheng; David Ayares; Keith A Horvath; Philip C Corcoran; Muhammad M Mohiuddin; Rolf N Barth; David K C Cooper; Richard N Pierson Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: H Iwase; B Ekser; V Satyananda; H Zhou; H Hara; P Bajona; M Wijkstrom; J K Bhama; C Long; M Veroux; Y Wang; Y Dai; C Phelps; D Ayares; M B Ezzelarab; D K C Cooper Journal: Transpl Immunol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 1.708
Authors: Annie N Samraj; Oliver M T Pearce; Heinz Läubli; Alyssa N Crittenden; Anne K Bergfeld; Kalyan Banda; Christopher J Gregg; Andrea E Bingman; Patrick Secrest; Sandra L Diaz; Nissi M Varki; Ajit Varki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Whayoung Lee; Yuko Miyagawa; Cassandra Long; Burcin Ekser; Eric Walters; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; David Ayares; A Joseph Tector; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Cornea Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Hayato Iwase; Burcin Ekser; Hidetaka Hara; Carol Phelps; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Mohamed B Ezzelarab Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: David K C Cooper; Shinichi Matsumoto; Adrian Abalovich; Takeshi Itoh; Nizar I Mourad; Pierre R Gianello; Eckhard Wolf; Emanuele Cozzi Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939