Literature DB >> 26987551

Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future.

Richard J Miron1,2, Anton Sculean2, David L Cochran3, Stuart Froum4, Giovanni Zucchelli5, Carlos Nemcovsky6, Nikos Donos7, Staale Petter Lyngstadaas8, James Deschner9, Michel Dard10, Andreas Stavropoulos11, Yufeng Zhang12, Leonardo Trombelli13, Adrian Kasaj14, Yoshinori Shirakata15, Pierpaolo Cortellini16, Maurizio Tonetti17, Giulio Rasperini18,19, Søren Jepsen20, Dieter D Bosshardt2.   

Abstract

BACGROUND: On June 5th, 2015 at Europerio 8, a group of leading experts were gathered to discuss what has now been 20 years of documented evidence supporting the clinical use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Original experiments led by Lars Hammarström demonstrated that enamel matrix proteins could serve as key regenerative proteins capable of promoting periodontal regeneration including new cementum, with functionally oriented inserting new periodontal ligament fibres, and new alveolar bone formation. This pioneering work and vision by Lars Hammarström has paved the way to an enormous amount of publications related to its biological basis and clinical use. Twenty years later, it is clear that all these studies have greatly contributed to our understanding of how biologics can act as mediators for periodontal regeneration and have provided additional clinical means to support tissue regeneration of the periodontium. AIMS: This review article aims to: (1) provide the biological background necessary to understand the rational for the use of EMD for periodontal regeneration, (2) present animal and human histological evidence of periodontal regeneration following EMD application, (3) provide clinically relevant indications for the use of EMD and (4) discuss future avenues of research including key early findings leading to the development of Osteogain, a new carrier system for EMD specifically developed with better protein adsorption to bone grafting materials.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMD; Emdogain; Osteogain; enamel matrix derivative; enamel matrix proteins; intrabony defect; periodontal regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987551     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  46 in total

1.  Split-mouth evaluation of connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects in dogs.

Authors:  Y Shirakata; T Nakamura; Y Shinohara; K Nakamura-Hasegawa; C Hashiguchi; N Takeuchi; T Imafuji; A Sculean; K Noguchi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial].

Authors:  C Cao; F Wang; E B Wang; Y Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 3.  Challenges of Engineering Biomimetic Dental and Paradental Tissues.

Authors:  Mohammed E Grawish; Lamyaa M Grawish; Hala M Grawish; Mahmoud M Grawish; Salwa A El-Negoly
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrix using enamel matrix derivative and platelet-rich fibrin: influence on mature endothelial cell characteristics in vitro.

Authors:  Jung Soo Park; Andreas Max Pabst; Maximilian Ackermann; Maximilian Moergel; Junho Jung; Adrian Kasaj
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Traditional or regenerative periodontal surgery?-a comparison of the publications between two periodontal journals over time.

Authors:  Noémie Staubli; Julia C Schmidt; Sabrina L Buset; Claudia J Gutekunst; Fabiola R Rodriguez; Patrick R Schmidlin; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of enamel matrix derivative on wound healing following gingival recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomised, controlled, clinical study.

Authors:  Alexandra Stähli; Jean-Claude Imber; Elena Raptis; Giovanni E Salvi; Sigrun Eick; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Histological healing after nonsurgical periodontal treatment with enamel matrix derivatives in canine experimental periodontitis.

Authors:  Ammar Shujaa Addin; Tatsuya Akizuki; Takanori Matsuura; Shu Hoshi; Takahiro Ikawa; Kiichi Maruyama; Wataru Ono; Shunsuke Fukuba; Yuichi Izumi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Osteogain® loaded onto an absorbable collagen sponge induces attachment and osteoblast differentiation of ST2 cells in vitro.

Authors:  Richard J Miron; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Yufeng Zhang; Anton Sculean; Benjamin Pippenger; Yoshinori Shirakata; Umadevi Kandalam; Maria Hernandez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Assessment of early discomfort and wound healing outcomes after periodontal surgery with and without enamel matrix derivative: an observational retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Ye-Sol Park; Yeon-Tae Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Seong-Nyum Jeong
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Does enamel matrix derivative application provide additional clinical benefits in the treatment of maxillary Miller class I and II gingival recession? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Meza Mauricio; Camila Pinheiro Furquim; Willy Bustillos-Torrez; David Soto-Peñaloza; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Belen Retamal-Valdes; Marcelo Faveri
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.