Literature DB >> 32071470

[Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial].

C Cao1, F Wang1, E B Wang1, Y Liu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of bone defect regeneration and the periodontal status of the second molars after mandibular third molars extraction using β-tertiary calcium phosphate (β-TCP) in the test side compared with the spontaneously healed side. To the bone defect of mandibular second molars as a result of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars is a common phenomenon, many research shows that the mandibular second molars alveolar bone regeneration was about 1.5 mm and the periodontal pocket >7 mm was greater than 43.3% after mandibular third molars extraction. There has been significant progress researches in the repair of bone defect after the third molar removal, and bone graft filling was one of the effective methods. The bone graft substitutes include autogenous bone, allograft bone, xenograft bone and synthetic bone.
METHODS: A split mouth, randomized clinical study was designed. Fifteen patients with mandibular third molars in the same jaw planned to be extracted were enrolled in the study. One of the sockets of each patient was randomly selected and filled with easy-graftTMCLASSIC (test group). The contralateral socket was left to heal spontaneously (control group). cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed the day after the extraction and after 6 months. The horizontal dimensional changes of the sockets were recorded. The newly formed bone volume in the bone was analyzed by CBCT, and the probing depth (PD) was recorded. Student's t test was used to evaluate the difference between the two groups for each parameter, and the P value lower than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients (30 sockets) completed the flow-up, and all the 30 sockets healed uneventfully. After 6 months' healing, the new bone volume fraction of the test group was 63.3%±2.2%, while the new bone volume fraction of the control group was 50.1%±1.9%. The vertical dimensional increment of the test group was (5.53±0.39) mm, while the vertical change of the control group was (1.53±0.27) mm. The distal buccal site PD of the second molar was (3.0±0.7) mm in the test group, and (6.5±0.8) mm in the control group. Statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The randomized controlled clinical trial showed that the application of β-TCP for bone defect repair after the mandibular third molars extraction resulted in more vertical bone regeneration and less probing depth when compared with what was spontaneously healed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32071470      PMCID: PMC7439054     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  28 in total

1.  A regimen of systematic periodontal care after removal of impacted mandibular third molars manages periodontal pockets associated with the mandibular second molars.

Authors:  W Keung Leung; Esmonde F Corbet; Kwok Wing Kan; Edward C M Lo; Jerry K S Liu
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 2.  Risk of periodontal defects after third molar surgery: An exercise in evidence-based clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel T Richardson; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-08

3.  Use of resorbable membranes in periodontal defects treatment after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  M Aimetti; F Romano
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2007-10

4.  In vivo tissue engineered bone versus autologous bone: stability and structure.

Authors:  R M Zimmerer; P Jehn; H Kokemüller; R Abedian; M Lalk; F Tavassol; N-C Gellrich; S Spalthoff
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults.

Authors:  Ana Inocêncio Faria; Mercedes Gallas-Torreira; Mónica López-Ratón
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar.

Authors:  Javier Montero; Giuseppe Mazzaglia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Attachment levels and crevicular depths at the distal of mandibular second molars following removal of adjacent third molars.

Authors:  W H Osborne; A J Snyder; T R Tempel
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Does grafting of third molar extraction sockets enhance periodontal measures in 30- to 35-year-old patients?

Authors:  Khalid S Hassan; Hesham F Marei; Adel S Alagl
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: A clinical trial.

Authors:  Babak Amoian; Ehsan Moudi; Maryam Seyed Majidi; S M Ali Tabatabaei
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016-09

10.  How effective is collagen resorbable membrane placement after partially impacted mandibular third molar surgery on postoperative morbidity? A prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Adnan Kilinc; Mert Ataol
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  1 in total

1.  Regulatory effects of miR-28 on osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Min Wang; Tianming Dai; Qingqi Meng; Wen Wang; Siming Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.269

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.