Literature DB >> 26985061

18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.

Morand Piert1, Jeffrey Montgomery2, Lakshmi Priya Kunju3, Javed Siddiqui3, Virginia Rogers4, Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran3, Timothy D Johnson5, Xia Shao4, Matthew S Davenport4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed the value of fusion (18)F-fluoromethylcholine ((18)F-choline) PET/MRI for image-guided (targeted) prostate biopsies to detect significant prostate cancer (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) compared with standard (systematic 12-core) biopsies.
METHODS: Within an ongoing prospective clinical trial, hybrid (18)F-choline PET/CT and multiparametric 3T MRI (mpMRI) of the pelvis were performed in 36 subjects with a rising prostate-specific antigen for known (n = 15) or suspected (n = 21) prostate cancer before a prostate biopsy procedure. PET and T2-weighted MR volumes of the prostate were spatially registered using commercially available software. Biopsy targets were selected on the basis of visual appearance on MRI and graded as low, intermediate, or high risk for significant disease. Volumes of interest were defined for MR-identified lesions. (18)F-choline uptake measures were obtained from the MR target and a mirrored background volume of interest. The biopsy procedure was performed after registration of real-time transrectal ultrasound with T2-weighted MR and included image-guided cores plus standard cores. Histologic results were determined from standard and targeted biopsy cores as well as prostatectomy specimens (n = 10).
RESULTS: Fifteen subjects were ultimately identified with Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 prostate cancer, of which targeted biopsy identified significantly more (n = 12) than standard biopsies (n = 5; P = 0.002). A total of 52 lesions were identified by mpMRI (19 low, 18 intermediate, 15 high risk), and mpMRI-assigned risk was a strong predictor of final pathology (area under the curve = 0.81; P < 0.001). When the mean (18)F-choline target-to-background ratio was used, the addition of (18)F-choline to mpMRI significantly improved the prediction of Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 cancers over mpMRI alone (area under the curve = 0.92; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Fusion PET/MRI transrectal ultrasound image registration for targeted prostate biopsies is clinically feasible and accurate. The addition of (18)F-choline PET to mpMRI improves the identification of significant prostate cancer.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluoromethylcholine; PET/MRI; molecular imaging; prostate cancer; targeted prostate biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26985061      PMCID: PMC5819614          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  In vivo uptake of [11C]choline does not correlate with cell proliferation in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthonius J Breeuwsma; Jan Pruim; Maud M Jongen; Albert J Suurmeijer; Wim Vaalburg; Rien J Nijman; Igle J de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.

Authors:  Neil Kirby; Cynthia Chuang; Utako Ueda; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; R E Coleman; S Wang; S W Baldwin; M D Orr; C N Robertson; T J Polascik; D T Price
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.

Authors:  Courtney A Woodfield; Glenn A Tung; David J Grand; John A Pezzullo; Jason T Machan; Joseph F Renzulli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.

Authors:  James E Thompson; Daniel Moses; Ron Shnier; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; Lee Ponsky; Marley Pulbrook; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Andrew Hayen; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Challenges in accurate registration of 3-D medical imaging and histopathology in primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charles Meyer; Bing Ma; Lakshmi P Kunju; Matthew Davenport; Morand Piert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know.

Authors:  T Barrett; B Turkbey; P L Choyke
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  16 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Pancot; Marco Andrea Signor; Martina Urbani; Luca Balestreri; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  68Ga-PSMA-PET: added value and future applications in comparison to the current use of choline-PET and mpMRI in the workup of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Malaspina; Ugo De Giorgi; Jukka Kemppainen; Angelo Del Sole; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Krzysztof R Gorny; Bernadette Greenwood; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Feasibility and Initial Results: Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Oladunni Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  18F-Choline PET/mpMRI for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Part 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Christine L Barnett; Matthew S Davenport; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Brian T Denton; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo I Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Mark M Goodman; Baowei Fei; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Preclinical Evaluation of 11C-Sarcosine as a Substrate of Proton-Coupled Amino Acid Transporters and First Human Application in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Morand Piert; Xia Shao; David Raffel; Mathew S Davenport; Jeffrey Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Brian G Hockley; Javed Siddiqui; Peter J H Scott; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  PET imaging for lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Incerti; Paola Mapelli; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Management at Initial Staging and Time of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Jason Bailey; Morand Piert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  18F-Choline PET/mpMRI for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Part 1. Improved Risk Stratification for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Prasad R Shankar; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran; Xia Shao; Eunjee Lee; Brian Denton; Christine Barnett; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 11.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.