Literature DB >> 27582607

MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

David A Woodrum1, Krzysztof R Gorny1, Bernadette Greenwood2, Lance A Mynderse3.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous cancer and second-leading cause of death in men. Many patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer undergo definitive, curative treatment of the whole gland with either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. However, many men are reluctant to take the definitive step due to potential morbidity associated with either therapy. A growing interest in active surveillance or focal therapy has emerged as realistic alternatives for many patients. With each of these management strategies, it is critical to accurately quantify and stage the cancer with improved biopsy targeting and more precise imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, having dependable prostate imaging allows for targeted biopsies to improve the yield of clinically significant prostate cancer and decrease detection of indolent prostate cancer. MRI-guided targeted biopsy techniques include cognitive MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy, in-bore transrectal targeted biopsy using a calibrated guidance device, and in-bore direct MR-guided transperineal biopsy with a software-based transperineal grid template. Herein we present a contemporary review of MRI-guided targeted biopsy techniques for new and recurrent cancerous foci of the prostate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; MRI targeted biopsy; interventional radiology; needle biopsy; prostate cancer

Year:  2016        PMID: 27582607      PMCID: PMC5005080          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  37 in total

1.  Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. 1990.

Authors:  William H Cooner; B R Mosley; Charles L Rutherford; Jeff H Beard; Harry S Pond; William J Terry; Todd C Igel; Donald D Kidd
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A new robotic needle insertion method to minimise attendant prostate motion.

Authors:  Vera Lagerburg; Marinus A Moerland; Marco van Vulpen; Jan J W Lagendijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle.

Authors:  Michiel R van den Bosch; Maaike R Moman; Marco van Vulpen; Jan J Battermann; Ed Duiveman; Leonard J van Schelven; Hendrik de Leeuw; Jan J W Lagendijk; Marinus A Moerland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaosong Meng; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Neil Mendhiratta; Michael Fenstermaker; Richard Huang; James S Wysock; Marc A Bjurlin; Susan Marshall; Fang-Ming Deng; Ming Zhou; Jonathan Melamed; William C Huang; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Joanna H Shih; Sandeep Sankineni; Jamie Marko; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Arvin Koruthu George; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Visually directed vs. software-based targeted biopsy compared to transperineal template mapping biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Valerio; Neil McCartan; Alex Freeman; Shonit Punwani; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Alberto Briganti; Pieter De Visschere; Mark Emberton; Gianluca Giannarini; Alex Kirkham; Samir S Taneja; Harriet Thoeny; Geert Villeirs; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Martijn G Schouten; Joyce G R Bomers; Stefan P Hoogendoorn; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Hambrock; Henk Vergunst; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Enabling Technology for MRI-Guided Intervention.

Authors:  Farzad Sedaghat; Kemal Tuncali
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02

2.  Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  CT-guided transgluteal biopsy for systematic sampling of the prostate in patients without rectal access: a 13-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Michael C Olson; Thomas D Atwell; Lance A Mynderse; Bernard F King; Timothy Welch; Ajit H Goenka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Aytekin Oto; Clare M Tempany; Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Justin Streicher; Brian Lee Meyerson; Vidhya Karivedu; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-08-28

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy-A review of literature.

Authors:  Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat; Srinivas Samavedi; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Fikret Fatih Onol; Shannon Roof; Travis Rogers; Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-07-28

8.  "Prostate management" under MRI-guidance: 7 years of improvements.

Authors:  Thibault Tricard; Julien Garnon; Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Intisar Al Hashimi; Afshin Gangi; Hervé Lang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.