Literature DB >> 26983686

Reporting and use of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators at national and regional level in 15 countries.

Alexandru M Rotar1, Michael J van den Berg2, Dionne S Kringos1, Niek S Klazinga1.   

Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM OR ISSUE: OECD member states are involved since 2003 in a project coordinated by the OECD on Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI). All OECD countries are biennially requested by the OECD to deliver national data on the quality indicators for international benchmarking purposes. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: Currently, there is no knowledge whether the OECD HCQI information is used by the countries themselves for healthcare system accountability and improvement purposes. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: The objective of the study is to explore the reporting and use of OECD HCQI in OECD member-states. IMPLEMENTATION: Data were collected through a questionnaire sent to all OECD member-states containing factual questions on the reporting on all OECD HCQ-indicators. Responses were received between June and December 2014. In this timeframe, two reminders were sent to the participants. The work progress was presented during HCQI Meetings in November 2014 and May 2015. EVALUATION: Fifteen countries reported to have a total of 163 reports in which one or more HCQIs were reported. One hundred and sixteen were national and 47 were regional reports. Forty-nine reports had a general system focus, 80 were disease specific, 10 referred to a specific type of care setting, 22 were thematic and 2 were a combination of two (disease specific for a particular type of care and thematic for a specific type of care). Most reports were from Canada: 49. All 15 countries use one or more OECD indicators. LESSONS LEARNED: The OECD quality indicators have acquired a clear place in national and regional monitoring activities. Some indicators are reported more often than others. These differences partly reflect differences between healthcare systems. Whereas some indicators have become very common, such as cancer care indicators, others, such as mental healthcare and patient experience indicators are relatively new and require some more time to be adopted more widely.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OECD; health policy; healthcare quality indicators; performance indicators; quality of health care; reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26983686     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  11 in total

1.  Development of a core set of quality indicators for paediatric primary care practices in Europe, COSI-PPC-EU.

Authors:  Dominik A Ewald; Gottfried Huss; Silke Auras; Juan Ruiz-Canela Caceres; Adamos Hadjipanayis; Max Geraedts
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  A Methodological Framework for the Integrated Design of Decision-Intensive Care Pathways-an Application to the Management of COPD Patients.

Authors:  Carlo Combi; Barbara Oliboni; Alessandro Zardini; Francesca Zerbato
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 3.  Assessing equity and quality indicators for older people - Adaptation and validation of the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) checklist for the Portuguese care context.

Authors:  Adriana Taveira; Ana Paula Macedo; Nazaré Rego; José Crispim
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.070

4.  Variability in the assessment of children's primary healthcare in 30 European countries.

Authors:  Daniela Luzi; Ilaria Rocco; Oscar Tamburis; Barbara Corso; Nadia Minicuci; Fabrizio Pecoraro
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  The influence of family accommodation on pediatric hospital experience in Canada.

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Deron Ferguson; Sarah Fryda; Nicole Rubin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Dimensions, Dialectic, Discourse. Three Political Perspectives on the Sustainability of the German Healthcare System.

Authors:  Matthias Fischer; Harald Heinrichs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Capacity building in health care professions within the Gulf cooperation council countries: paving the way forward.

Authors:  Javaid I Sheikh; Sohaila Cheema; Karima Chaabna; Albert B Lowenfels; Ravinder Mamtani
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Rural and urban differences in health system performance among older Chinese adults: cross-sectional analysis of a national sample.

Authors:  Vicky Mengqi Qin; Barbara McPake; Magdalena Z Raban; Thomas E Cowling; Riyadh Alshamsan; Kee Seng Chia; Peter C Smith; Rifat Atun; John Tayu Lee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The use of indicators for the management of Mental Health Services.

Authors:  Inacia Bezerra de Lima; Filipe Andrade Bernadi; Diego Bettiol Yamada; Andre Luiz Teixeira Vinci; Rui Pedro Charters Lopes Rijo; Domingos Alves; Antonia Regina Ferreira Furegato
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2021-04-09

10.  Comparative health system performance in six middle-income countries: cross-sectional analysis using World Health Organization study of global ageing and health.

Authors:  Riyadh Alshamsan; John Tayu Lee; Sangeeta Rana; Hasan Areabi; Christopher Millett
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.