Literature DB >> 29654400

Development of a core set of quality indicators for paediatric primary care practices in Europe, COSI-PPC-EU.

Dominik A Ewald1, Gottfried Huss2, Silke Auras3, Juan Ruiz-Canela Caceres4, Adamos Hadjipanayis5,6, Max Geraedts7.   

Abstract

Paediatric ambulatory healthcare systems in Europe are, because of historical reasons, diverse and show strikingly different outcomes. All across Europe, the benchmarking of structures, processes and outcomes could reveal opportunities for improving Paediatric Primary Care (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop a set of Quality Indicators (QIs) to assess and monitor PPC in Europe. In a three-step process, we used the available external evidence and European expert consensus in a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) to develop an indicator set. (1) A broad literature and online research of published QI and guidelines yielded an inventory of 1516 QI. (2) A collaborative panel of paediatric senior experts from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and the European Confederation of Primary Care Paediatricians (ECPCP) from 15 European countries participated in a first consensus process to reduce the initial indicator inventory by eliminating not PPC-focused indicators and duplicates. (3) In a second consensus process, the panel rated the QI regarding validity and feasibility. The final QI set "COSI-PPC-EU" consists of 42 indicators in five categories of PPC: (A) health promotion/prevention/screening (13 QI), (B) acute care (9 QI), (C) chronic care (8 QI), (D) practice management (3 QI) and (E) patient safety (9 QI).
CONCLUSION: COSI-PPC-EU represents a consented set of a limited number of valid quality indicators for the application in paediatric primary care in different healthcare systems throughout Europe. What is Known: • Paediatric ambulatory healthcare systems in Europe are diverse and show strikingly different outcomes. • There are known gaps in quality performance measures of paediatric primary care in Europe. Pre-existing sets of quality indicators are predominantly limited to national populations, specific diseases and hospital care. What is New: • A set of 42 quality indicators for primary paediatric care in Europe was developed in a multi-country collaborative effort. The method combined a systematic literature review and a consensus process among European paediatric experts. • The quality indicator set can facilitate quality improvement of PPC. After studying the feasibility, providers can use COSI-PPC-EU to monitor, compare and improve performance of practices, regions and countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmarking; Community child care; EAP; ECPCP; Europe; Paediatric primary care; Quality improvement; Quality indicator; Quality management; RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654400     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-018-3140-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  36 in total

1.  Paediatric primary care in Europe: variation between countries.

Authors:  Diego van Esso; Stefano del Torso; Adamos Hadjipanayis; Armand Biver; Elke Jaeger-Roman; Bjorn Wettergren; Alf Nicholson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe.

Authors:  Yvonne Engels; Stephen Campbell; Maaike Dautzenberg; Pieter van den Hombergh; Henrik Brinkmann; Joachim Szécsényi; Hector Falcoff; Luc Seuntjens; Beat Kuenzi; Richard Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices.

Authors:  Yvonne Engels; Maaike Dautzenberg; Stephen Campbell; Björn Broge; Nicole Boffin; Martin Marshall; Glyn Elwyn; Vlasta Vodopivec-Jamsek; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Marianne Samuelson; Richard Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States.

Authors:  Rita Mangione-Smith; Alison H DeCristofaro; Claude M Setodji; Joan Keesey; David J Klein; John L Adams; Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  European challenges: cross-border care for children.

Authors:  Ulrike Salzer-Muhar; Arnold Pollak; Christoph Aufricht; Jochen Ehrich; Simon Lenton
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Quality Indicator Development for Positive Screen Follow-up for Sickle Cell Disease and Trait.

Authors:  Elissa Z Faro; C Jason Wang; Suzette O Oyeku
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  [Choosing wisely : Primarily the quality of indications].

Authors:  G Hasenfuß; E Märker-Hermann; M Hallek; C Sieber
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 8.  Incidence and nature of dosing errors in paediatric medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ian C K Wong; Maisoon A Ghaleb; Bryony D Franklin; Nick Barber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Freedom of movement across the EU: legal and ethical issues for children with chronic disease.

Authors:  Cecilia Mercieca; Kevin Aquilina; Richard Pullicino; Andrew A Borg
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Primary care quality indicators for children: measuring quality in UK general practice.

Authors:  Peter J Gill; Braden O'Neill; Peter Rose; David Mant; Anthony Harnden
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  3 in total

1.  Primary care of mothers and infants by the same or different physicians: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Natasha R Saunders; Joel G Ray; Christina Diong; Jun Guan; Eyal Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Assessment of the quality of routine ambulatory healthcare for common disorders in children and adolescents in Germany: study protocol for a retrospective medical record review (QualiPäd).

Authors:  Viktor Tischlik; Claudia Mehl; Dominik Ewald; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Max Geraedts; Christian J Bachmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  What makes a good quality indicator set? A systematic review of criteria.

Authors:  Laura Schang; Iris Blotenberg; Dennis Boywitt
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.038

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.