| Literature DB >> 30871521 |
Javaid I Sheikh1, Sohaila Cheema2, Karima Chaabna3, Albert B Lowenfels4, Ravinder Mamtani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a worldwide shortage of health care workers. This problem is particularly severe in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries because of shortages in certain medical disciplines, due to a lack of nationally-trained professionals and a less developed educational system compared to other high income countries. Consequently, GCC countries are heavily dependent on an expatriate health care workforce; a problem exacerbated by high turnover. We discuss challenges and potential strategies for improving and strengthening capacity building efforts in health care professions in the GCC. MAIN TEXT: In the GCC, there are 139 schools providing professional health education in medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, nursing, midwifery, and other specialties. Health education school density reported for the GCC countries ranges between 2.2 and 2.8 schools per one million inhabitants, except in Oman where it is 4.0 per one million inhabitants. The GCC countries rely heavily on expatriate health professionals. The number of physicians and nurses in the GCC countries are 2.1 and 4.5 per 1000 respectively, compared to 2.8 and 7.9 among member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Interestingly, the number of dentists and pharmacists is higher in the GCC countries compared to OECD countries. A nationally trained health care workforce is essential for the GCC countries. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy are two identified areas where growth and development are recommended. Custom-tailored continuing medical education and continuing professional development (CPD) programs can augment the skills of health practitioners, and allow for the expansion of their scope of practice when warranted.Entities:
Keywords: Capacity building; Continuing education; Continuing professional development; GCC countries; Health care workforce development; Human resource development
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30871521 PMCID: PMC6417223 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1513-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Density of health care workforce (per 1000) in 2014
| Location | Physicians | Nurses and midwives | Dentistry personnel | Pharmaceutical personnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Cooperation Councila | 2.193 | 4.588 | 0.886 | 1.189 |
| Bahrain | 0.939 | 2.445 | 0.249 | 0.161 |
| Kuwait | 1.949 | 4.729 | 0.596 | 0.483 |
| Oman | 1.541 | 3.345 | 0.185 | 0.348 |
| Qatar | 1.964 | 5.7 | 0.572 | 0.931 |
| Saudi Arabia | 2.568 | 5.207 | 0.398 | 0.701 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1.558 | 3.061 | 3.1 | 3.68 |
| Member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmentb | 2.800 | 7.982 | 0.4 | 0.807 |
| Canada (2015) | 2.539 | 9.842 | 1.253 | 0.98 |
| Australia (2015) | 3.496 | 12.37 | 0.578 | 0.847 |
| Norway (2015) | 4.385 | 17.824 | 0.851 | 0.741 |
| Japan (2014) | 2.367 | 11.241 | 0.797 | 1.704 |
| Mexico (2013) | 2.071 | 2.509 | 0.117 | – |
| Sweden (2013) | 4.107 | 11.892 | 0.805 | 0.755 |
| Turkey (2014) | 1.749 | 3.200 | 0.297 | 0.351 |
| United Kingdom (2015) | 2.806 | 8.436 | 0.535 | 0.84 |
| United States (2013) | 2.554 | 9.884 | – | 0.887 |
Data source: Global Health Observatory data repository [4]
aEstimated population-weighted average, using population size estimated by the United Nations [6]
bEstimated population-weighted average for all the member countries of the OECD, using population size estimated by the United Nations [6]
Density of health care school’s workforce (per 1000) in 2017
| Location | Number (%) | Density per one million inhabitants | Missing programs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Cooperation Council | 139 (100) | 2.6 | – |
| Bahrain | 3 (2.1) | 2.2 | Dental college and occupational therapy and physiotherapy programs |
| Kuwait | 11 (7.9) | 2.8 | Midwifery program |
| Oman | 18 (12.9) | 4.0 | Occupational therapy program |
| Qatar | 6 (4.3) | 2.7 | Dental college and occupational therapy program |
| Saudi Arabia | 77 (55.4) | 2.5 | – |
| United Arab Emirates | 24 (17.3) | 2.6 | Occupational therapy and midwifery programs |
Fundamental elements recommended for capacity building through CME/CPD programs in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council
| Main goals | Special topics to be emphasized | Potential barriers |
|---|---|---|
| • Identify existing challenges and existing gaps based on overall long-term goals of country | • Critical thinking | • Financial limitations |
National health authorities evaluating health institutions and health care CME/CPD programs in the GCC countries
| Country | Institution for accreditation | Year established |
|---|---|---|
| Bahrain | • Training Directorate – Ministry of Health – Kingdom of Bahrain ( | NS |
| Kuwait | • Center for Continuing Education and Professional Development of the Kuwait Institute of Medical Specialization ( | NS |
| Oman | • Oman Medical Specialty Board ( | 2006 |
| Qatar | • The Registration and Licensing Department in Qatar Council for Healthcare Practitioners (QCHP, | 2013 |
| United Arab Emirates | • Ministry of Health (MOH, | NS |
| Saudi Arabia | • Saudi Commission for Health Specialties ( | 1992 |
NS year not specified
Examples of cooperative international medical relationships developed in the GCC countries
| Program type | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| International scholarships. | Selected students from the GCC sent to host country to obtain medial training. | Minimal expenditure on support structures and faculty. Flexible and integrated. | Students may endeavor to stay in host country. Limited overall improvement to existing health profile. |
| Premedical programs for undergraduate students. | Students in existing or new university can take premedical course. | Avoids expensive costs of maintaining a full medical school. Integrated and innovative. | Students may face problems selecting and entering an approved medical school. |
| Partial institutional link at a program level. | Donor school agrees to establish and supervise a particular program in recipient institution. | Works well when recipient institution has well-organized facilities but lacks a specific program. Flexible, integrative, and innovative. | Country-specific cultural differences can impair program effectiveness. |
| Consulting agreement between two institutions. | Donor institution signs agreement covering agreed-upon deliverables to upgrade recipient institution. | Recipient institution can benefit from organizational skills and experience of donor organization without committing to long-term investment in personnel with requisite skills. Flexible, integrative, and innovative. | Resentment from personnel in recipient institution may interfere with agreed-upon objectives. |
| Establishment of new, completely affiliated health educational school in recipient country | Donor institution agrees to develop a completely integrated satellite school with same standards and courses as the existing school in the donor country. | Offers high quality education to selected students. Provides unique opportunity to strengthen the foundation of the recipient country’s health system. Integrated and innovative. | Expensive. Both institutions must make a long-term commitment (not flexible). |
| Physician exchange programs at institutional level. | Physicians with special skills travel and work in distant schools or hospitals. | Method for rapid, cost-effective knowledge and skill transfer. Especially effective if there is a two-way physician exchange (flexible, integrative, and innovative). | Logistical problems such as language and cultural differences. Immediate benefit, but duration of improvement unsure. |