| Literature DB >> 26981167 |
William J Kelly1, Gemma Henderson1, Diana M Pacheco1, Dong Li1, Kerri Reilly1, Graham E Naylor1, Peter H Janssen1, Graeme T Attwood1, Eric Altermann1, Sinead C Leahy1.
Abstract
Acetogens are a specialized group of anaerobic bacteria able to produce acetate from CO2 and H2 via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway. In some gut environments acetogens can compete with methanogens for H2, and as a result rumen acetogens are of interest in the development of microbial approaches for methane mitigation. The acetogen Eubacterium limosum SA11 was isolated from the rumen of a New Zealand sheep and its genome has been sequenced to examine its potential application in methane mitigation strategies, particularly in situations where hydrogenotrophic methanogens are inhibited resulting in increased H2 levels in the rumen. The 4.15 Mb chromosome of SA11 has an average G + C content of 47 %, and encodes 3805 protein-coding genes. There is a single prophage inserted in the chromosome, and several other gene clusters appear to have been acquired by horizontal transfer. These include genes for cell wall glycopolymers, a type VII secretion system, cell surface proteins and chemotaxis. SA11 is able to use a variety of organic substrates in addition to H2/CO2, with acetate and butyrate as the principal fermentation end-products, and genes involved in these metabolic pathways have been identified. An unusual feature is the presence of 39 genes encoding trimethylamine methyltransferase family proteins, more than any other bacterial genome. Overall, SA11 is a metabolically versatile organism, but its ability to grow on such a wide range of substrates suggests it may not be a suitable candidate to take the place of hydrogen-utilizing methanogens in the rumen.Entities:
Keywords: Acetogen; Butyrate; Eubacterium limosum; Methane mitigation; Rumen; Wood–Ljungdahl pathway
Year: 2016 PMID: 26981167 PMCID: PMC4791908 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0147-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Fig. 1Morphology of E. limosum SA11. Micrograph of E. limosum SA11 cells captured at 100x magnification
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of E. limosum SA11 relative to the type strains of the other Eubacterium species. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [43]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.83983608 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [44]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [45] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 16 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 1214 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [46]. Species with strain genome sequencing projects registered in the Genomes Online Database (GOLD) [47] are labeled with an asterisk
Classification and general features of Eubacterium limosum SA11 [48]
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence codea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | Domain: Bacteria | TAS [ | |
| Phylum: | TAS [ | ||
| Class: | TAS [ | ||
| Order: | TAS [ | ||
| Family: | TAS [ | ||
| Genus: | TAS [ | ||
| Species: | TAS [ | ||
| strain: SA11 | |||
| Gram stain | Positive | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | Rod | TAS [ | |
| Motility | Non-motile | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | Not reported | NAS | |
| Temperature range | 30-45 °C | NAS | |
| Optimum temperature | 37 °C | NAS | |
| pH range; Optimum | 5.0-7.5; 7.0 | NAS | |
| Carbon source | Glucose, fructose, lactate, methanol, 3,4,5 trimethoxybenzoic acid | IDA | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | Sheep rumen | TAS [ |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | Not reported | |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | Anaerobic | IDA |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | Symbiont | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | Non-pathogen | NAS |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Palmerston North, New Zealand | IDA |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection | Not reported | |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | -40.35 (40°21'00"S) | IDA |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | +175.61 (175°36'36"E) | IDA |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 30 M | IDA |
aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [59]
Project information
| MIGS ID | Property | Term |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | High-quality, closed genome |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Paired-end library |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | 454 GS FLX Titanium chemistry |
| MIGS-31.2 | Fold coverage | 43× |
| MIGS-30 | Assemblers | Newbler |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Glimmer and BLASTX |
| Locus Tag | ACH52_ | |
| Genbank ID | CP011914 | |
| Genbank Date of Release | 23rd December 2015 | |
| GOLD ID | Gp0125209 | |
| BIOPROJECT | PRJNA280903 | |
| MIGS 13 | Source Material Identifier |
|
| Project relevance | Ruminant methane emissions |
Fig. 3a Culture density achieved in 40 h by SA11 growing with hydrogen in media with different pH values. Points indicate means of three replicates, with one standard error on either side of the mean. b Culture density achieved in 40 h by SA11 growing with hydrogen at different temperatures. Points indicate means of three replicates, with one standard error on either side of the mean
Fig. 4Use of hydrogen by suspensions of hydrogen-grown (○) or glucose-grown (●) cells of SA11. Points indicate means of five replicates, with one standard error on either side of the mean
Genome statistics
| Attribute | Value | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 4,150,332 | 100.00 |
| DNA coding (bp) | 3,663,440 | 88.27 |
| DNA G + C (bp) | 1,968,558 | 47.43 |
| DNA scaffolds | 1 | 100.00 |
| Total genes | 3902 | 100.00 |
| Protein coding genes | 3805 | 97.51 |
| RNA genes | 76 | 1.95 |
| Pseudo genes | 21 | 0.54 |
| Genes with function prediction | 2856 | 75.06 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 2545 | 66.89 |
| Genes with Pfam domains | 3349 | 88.02 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 242 | 6.36 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 1011 | 26.57 |
| CRISPR repeats | 2 |
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories
| Code | Value | % of totala | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 150 | 3.94 | Translation |
| A | 0 | 0.00 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 314 | 8.25 | Transcription |
| L | 123 | 3.23 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 0 | 0.00 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 26 | 0.68 | Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis |
| V | 87 | 2.29 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 168 | 4.42 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 139 | 3.65 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| N | 18 | 0.47 | Cell motility |
| U | 15 | 0.39 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 72 | 1.89 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 187 | 4.91 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 180 | 4.73 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 272 | 7.15 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 65 | 1.71 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 107 | 2.81 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 52 | 1.37 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 117 | 3.07 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 26 | 0.68 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 266 | 6.99 | General function prediction only |
| S | 161 | 4.23 | Function unknown |
| - | 1260 | 33.11 | Not in COGs |
aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome
Fig. 5Genome atlas for E. limosum SA11. The circles from the outside represent: (1) forward and reverse coding domain sequences (CDS), the colour coding of the CDS represent different Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories; (2) rRNA and tRNA; (3) % GC plot; (4) GC skew [(GC)/(G + C)]
Fig. 6Genome organization of the prophage from E. limosum SA11. ORFs are drawn to scale and annotations are shown in vertical text. The absolute size of the phage genome is indicated as a horizontal bar below the genome map, and the numbers indicate nucleotide position