Literature DB >> 24274095

The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review.

J Jeyanathan1, C Martin1, D P Morgavi1.   

Abstract

Concerns about the environmental effect and the economic burden of methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants are driving the search for ways to mitigate rumen methanogenesis. The use of direct-fed microbials (DFM) is one possible option to decrease CH4 emission from ruminants. Direct-fed microbials are already used in ruminants mainly to increase productivity and to improve health, and are readily accepted by producers and consumers alike. However, studies on the use of DFM as rumen CH4 mitigants are scarce. A few studies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown a CH4-decreasing effect but, to date, there has not been a systematic exploration of DFM as modulators of rumen methanogenesis. In this review, we explored biochemical pathways competing with methanogenesis that, potentially, could be modulated by the use of DFM. Pathways involving the redirection of H2 away from methanogenesis and pathways producing less H2 during feed fermentation are the preferred options. Propionate formation is an example of the latter option that in addition to decrease CH4 formation increases the retention of energy from the diet. Homoacetogenesis is a pathway using H2 to produce acetate, however up to now no acetogen has been shown to efficiently compete with methanogens in the rumen. Nitrate and sulphate reduction are pathways competing with methanogenesis, but the availability of these substances in the rumen is limited. Although there were studies using nitrate and sulphate as chemical additives, use of DFM for improving these processes and decrease the accumulation of toxic metabolites needs to be explored more. There are some other pathways such as methanotrophy and capnophily or modes of action such as inhibition of methanogens that theoretically could be provided by DFM and affect methanogenesis. We conclude that DFM is a promising alternative for rumen methane mitigation that should be further explored for their practical usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24274095     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113002085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  26 in total

1.  Effect of Nitrooxy Compounds with Different Molecular Structures on the Rumen Methanogenesis, Metabolic Profile, and Methanogenic Community.

Authors:  Wei Jin; Zhenxiang Meng; Jing Wang; Yanfen Cheng; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Development of Multiwell-Plate Methods Using Pure Cultures of Methanogens To Identify New Inhibitors for Suppressing Ruminant Methane Emissions.

Authors:  M R Weimar; J Cheung; D Dey; C McSweeney; M Morrison; Y Kobayashi; W B Whitman; V Carbone; L R Schofield; R S Ronimus; G M Cook
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Bacteria and Methanogens in the Human Microbiome: a Review of Syntrophic Interactions.

Authors:  Kenza Djemai; Michel Drancourt; Maryam Tidjani Alou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  The complete genome sequence of Eubacterium limosum SA11, a metabolically versatile rumen acetogen.

Authors:  William J Kelly; Gemma Henderson; Diana M Pacheco; Dong Li; Kerri Reilly; Graham E Naylor; Peter H Janssen; Graeme T Attwood; Eric Altermann; Sinead C Leahy
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2016-03-15

5.  Illumina sequencing analysis of the ruminal microbiota in high-yield and low-yield lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Jinjin Tong; Hua Zhang; Delian Yang; Yonghong Zhang; Benhai Xiong; Linshu Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Redundancy, resilience, and host specificity of the ruminal microbiota: implications for engineering improved ruminal fermentations.

Authors:  Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review.

Authors:  David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Leticia Abecia; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Identification, Comparison, and Validation of Robust Rumen Microbial Biomarkers for Methane Emissions Using Diverse Bos Taurus Breeds and Basal Diets.

Authors:  Marc D Auffret; Robert Stewart; Richard J Dewhurst; Carol-Anne Duthie; John A Rooke; Robert J Wallace; Tom C Freeman; Timothy J Snelling; Mick Watson; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Lactation-related metabolic mechanism investigated based on mammary gland metabolomics and 4 biofluids' metabolomics relationships in dairy cows.

Authors:  Hui-Zeng Sun; Kai Shi; Xue-Hui Wu; Ming-Yuan Xue; Zi-Hai Wei; Jian-Xin Liu; Hong-Yun Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Monensin and Nisin Affect Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota Differently In Vitro.

Authors:  Junshi Shen; Zhuang Liu; Zhongtang Yu; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.