Literature DB >> 15634814

Reliability and reproducibility of radiographs of greater tuberosity displacement. A cadaveric study.

Bradford O Parsons1, Steven J Klepps, Suzanne Miller, Justin Bird, James Gladstone, Evan Flatow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classification of fractures of the greater tuberosity has shown poor reliability, in part as a result of an inability to assess fracture displacement accurately. We used fluoroscopic images of prepositioned osteotomized greater tuberosity fragments in cadavers to determine the accuracy of radiographic interpretation, the interobserver reliability, and the effect that radiographs might have on surgical decision-making.
METHODS: Twelve osteotomies of the greater tuberosity (three each with 2, 5, 10, and 15 mm of displacement) were created in whole-body cadavers. Six fluoroscopic images (anteroposterior views in external and internal rotation, anteroposterior views in neutral rotation with 15 degrees of cephalic and 15 degrees of caudal tilt, a lateral outlet view, and an axillary view) were made after each osteotomy. Four experienced orthopaedic surgeons measured displacement in millimeters on seventy-two randomized images. Four views in sequence (the anteroposterior view in internal rotation and the outlet view together, then the axillary view, and then the anteroposterior view in external rotation) of each osteotomy pattern were then viewed, and each surgeon was asked whether surgery would be indicated on the basis of each set of images.
RESULTS: No one fluoroscopic view was significantly more accurate than another. There was a trend toward increased accuracy of imaging of minimally displaced (</=5 mm) tuberosity fragments with the anteroposterior view in external rotation. When viewed sequentially, the anteroposterior view in external rotation, evaluated last, altered treatment in nine of forty-eight situations. There was substantial agreement (kappa = 0.71) among the surgeons with respect to their recommendations for treatment of the displaced greater tuberosities after they had inspected the four images. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, we are the first to examine the accuracy and reliability of interpreting images of known displacements of the greater tuberosity. Multiple radiographic views are needed to evaluate displacement of the greater tuberosity appropriately. The anteroposterior view in external rotation can profile the greater tuberosity and help demonstrate small displacements. Treatment decisions should be consistent between surgeons when multiple views are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15634814     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

1.  [Bony avulsions of the rotator cuff : Arthroscopic concepts].

Authors:  S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  CORR Insights(®): Greater Tuberosity Fractures: Does Fracture Assessment and Treatment Recommendation Vary Based on Imaging Modality?

Authors:  Donald H Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Axillary View Typically Does Not Contribute to Decision Making in Care for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Joshua S Dines; Jacqueline F Birnbaum; Lionel E Lazaro; Tristan C Lorich; Milton T M Little; Joseph T Nguyen; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity: When are they treated conservatively?: A baseline study.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Lukas F Heilmann; Michael J Raschke; Helmut Lill; J Christoph Katthagen; Alexander Ellwein
Journal:  Obere Extrem       Date:  2018-05-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.