Literature DB >> 26980726

Comprehensive mutational profiling of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Nicolas Duployez1, Alice Marceau-Renaut1, Nicolas Boissel2, Arnaud Petit3, Maxime Bucci4, Sandrine Geffroy1, Hélène Lapillonne5, Aline Renneville1, Christine Ragu3, Martin Figeac6, Karine Celli-Lebras2, Catherine Lacombe7, Jean-Baptiste Micol8, Omar Abdel-Wahab9, Pascale Cornillet10, Norbert Ifrah11, Hervé Dombret2, Guy Leverger3, Eric Jourdan12, Claude Preudhomme1.   

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) or inv(16) have been recognized as unique entities within AML and are usually reported together as core binding factor AML (CBF-AML). However, there is considerable clinical and biological heterogeneity within this group of diseases, and relapse incidence reaches up to 40%. Moreover, translocations involving CBFs are not sufficient to induce AML on its own and the full spectrum of mutations coexisting with CBF translocations has not been elucidated. To address these issues, we performed extensive mutational analysis by high-throughput sequencing in 215 patients with CBF-AML enrolled in the Phase 3 Trial of Systematic Versus Response-adapted Timed-Sequential Induction in Patients With Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Treating Patients with Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Interleukin-2 trials (age, 1-60 years). Mutations in genes activating tyrosine kinase signaling (including KIT, N/KRAS, and FLT3) were frequent in both subtypes of CBF-AML. In contrast, mutations in genes that regulate chromatin conformation or encode members of the cohesin complex were observed with high frequencies in t(8;21) AML (42% and 18%, respectively), whereas they were nearly absent in inv(16) AML. High KIT mutant allele ratios defined a group of t(8;21) AML patients with poor prognosis, whereas high N/KRAS mutant allele ratios were associated with the lack of KIT or FLT3 mutations and a favorable outcome. In addition, mutations in epigenetic modifying or cohesin genes were associated with a poor prognosis in patients with tyrosine kinase pathway mutations, suggesting synergic cooperation between these events. These data suggest that diverse cooperating mutations may influence CBF-AML pathophysiology as well as clinical behavior and point to potential unique pathogenesis of t(8;21) vs inv(16) AML.
© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980726      PMCID: PMC5457131          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-688705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  49 in total

Review 1.  Core-binding factors in haematopoiesis and leukaemia.

Authors:  Nancy A Speck; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  Guido Marcucci; Krzysztof Mrózek; Amy S Ruppert; Kati Maharry; Jonathan E Kolitz; Joseph O Moore; Robert J Mayer; Mark J Pettenati; Bayard L Powell; Colin G Edwards; Lisa J Sterling; James W Vardiman; Charles A Schiffer; Andrew J Carroll; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum; Kenneth J Kopecky; Martin S Tallman; Marilyn L Slovak; Holly M Gundacker; Haesook T Kim; Gordon W Dewald; Hagop M Kantarjian; Sherry R Pierce; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  In utero origin of t(8;21) AML1-ETO translocations in childhood acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Joseph L Wiemels; Zhijian Xiao; Patricia A Buffler; Ana T Maia; Xiaomei Ma; Brian M Dicks; Martyn T Smith; Luoping Zhang; James Feusner; John Wiencke; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Helena Kempski; Mel Greaves
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Incidence and prognostic impact of c-Kit, FLT3, and Ras gene mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML).

Authors:  N Boissel; H Leroy; B Brethon; N Philippe; S de Botton; A Auvrignon; E Raffoux; T Leblanc; X Thomas; O Hermine; B Quesnel; A Baruchel; G Leverger; H Dombret; C Preudhomme
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  The core-binding factor leukemias: lessons learned from murine models.

Authors:  James R Downing
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Alexander Kohlmann; Susanne Schnittger; Benedikt Brors; Martin Dugas; Susanne Mergenthaler; Wolfgang Kern; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Roland Eils; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Molecular genetics of human leukemias: new insights into therapy.

Authors:  D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.851

9.  The influence of age on prognosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia differs according to cytogenetic subgroups.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger; Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Individual patient data-based meta-analysis of patients aged 16 to 60 years with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a survey of the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Intergroup.

Authors:  R F Schlenk; A Benner; J Krauter; T Büchner; C Sauerland; G Ehninger; M Schaich; B Mohr; D Niederwieser; R Krahl; R Pasold; K Döhner; A Ganser; H Döhner; G Heil
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Advances in the heterogeneity of KIT, FLT3, and RAS mutations (Review).

Authors:  Xi Quan; Jianchuan Deng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25

Review 2.  When to obtain genomic data in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and which mutations matter.

Authors:  Gregory W Roloff; Elizabeth A Griffiths
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Genotypic and clinical heterogeneity within NCCN favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Stephen A Strickland; Aaron C Shaver; Michael Byrne; Robert D Daber; P Brent Ferrell; David R Head; Sanjay R Mohan; Claudio A Mosse; Tamara K Moyo; Thomas P Stricker; Cindy Vnencak-Jones; Michael R Savona; Adam C Seegmiller
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Genomic heterogeneity in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia and its clinical implication.

Authors:  Nikolaus Jahn; Tobias Terzer; Eric Sträng; Anna Dolnik; Sibylle Cocciardi; Ekaterina Panina; Andrea Corbacioglu; Julia Herzig; Daniela Weber; Anika Schrade; Katharina Götze; Thomas Schröder; Michael Lübbert; Dominique Wellnitz; Elisabeth Koller; Richard F Schlenk; Verena I Gaidzik; Peter Paschka; Frank G Rücker; Michael Heuser; Felicitas Thol; Arnold Ganser; Axel Benner; Hartmut Döhner; Lars Bullinger; Konstanze Döhner
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 5.  Cohesin Mutations in Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Joseph B Fisher; Maureen McNulty; Michael J Burke; John D Crispino; Sridhar Rao
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  The increasing complexity of the management of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mark R Litzow
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  The genomics of acute myeloid leukemia in children.

Authors:  Shannon E Conneely; Rachel E Rau
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  RUNX1 and inv(16) are frenemies in AML.

Authors:  Sridhar Rao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  The Role of Additional Sex Combs-Like Proteins in Cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Micol; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.