Literature DB >> 29310020

Genotypic and clinical heterogeneity within NCCN favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Stephen A Strickland1, Aaron C Shaver2, Michael Byrne1, Robert D Daber3, P Brent Ferrell1, David R Head2, Sanjay R Mohan1, Claudio A Mosse4, Tamara K Moyo1, Thomas P Stricker5, Cindy Vnencak-Jones2, Michael R Savona1, Adam C Seegmiller6.   

Abstract

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defines the following types of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as favorable-risk: acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17) (APL); AML with core-binding factor (CBF) rearrangements, including t(8;21) and inv(16) or t(16;16) without mutations in KIT (CBF-KITwt); and AML with normal cytogenetics and mutations in NPM1 (NPM1mut); or biallelic mutations in CEBPA (CEBPAmut/mut), without FLT3-ITD. Although these AMLs are categorized as favorable risk by NCCN, clinical experience suggests that there are differences in clinical outcome amongst these cytogenetically and molecularly distinct leukemias. This study compared clinical and genotypic characteristics of 60 patients with favorable-risk AML, excluding APL, and demonstrated significant differences between them. Patients with NPM1mut AML were significantly older than those in the other groups. Targeted next-generation sequencing on DNA from peripheral blood or bone marrow revealed significantly more mutations in NPM1mut AML than the other favorable-risk diseases, especially in genes related to DNA splicing and methylation. CEBPAmut/mut AMLs exhibited more mutations in transcription-related genes. Patients with NPM1mut AML and CEBPAmut/mut AML show significantly reduced overall survival in comparison with CBF-KITwt AML. These findings emphasize that favorable-risk AML patients have divergent outcomes and that differences in clinical and genotypic characteristics should be considered in their evaluation and management.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Core binding factor; Favorable risk; Molecular diagnostics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29310020      PMCID: PMC5856485          DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  40 in total

Review 1.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Daniel J Weisdorf; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  Guido Marcucci; Krzysztof Mrózek; Amy S Ruppert; Kati Maharry; Jonathan E Kolitz; Joseph O Moore; Robert J Mayer; Mark J Pettenati; Bayard L Powell; Colin G Edwards; Lisa J Sterling; James W Vardiman; Charles A Schiffer; Andrew J Carroll; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum; Kenneth J Kopecky; Martin S Tallman; Marilyn L Slovak; Holly M Gundacker; Haesook T Kim; Gordon W Dewald; Hagop M Kantarjian; Sherry R Pierce; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Alan H Shih; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Jay P Patel; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Survival in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in Germany and the United States: Major differences in survival in young adults.

Authors:  Dianne Pulte; Lina Jansen; Felipe A Castro; Agne Krilaviciute; Alexander Katalinic; Benjamin Barnes; Meike Ressing; Bernd Holleczek; Sabine Luttmann; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations.

Authors:  Konstanze Döhner; Richard F Schlenk; Marianne Habdank; Claudia Scholl; Frank G Rücker; Andrea Corbacioglu; Lars Bullinger; Stefan Fröhling; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Authors:  Christian Thiede; Sina Koch; Eva Creutzig; Christine Steudel; Thomas Illmer; Markus Schaich; Gerhard Ehninger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  RUNX1 mutations are associated with poor outcome in younger and older patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia and with distinct gene and MicroRNA expression signatures.

Authors:  Jason H Mendler; Kati Maharry; Michael D Radmacher; Krzysztof Mrózek; Heiko Becker; Klaus H Metzeler; Sebastian Schwind; Susan P Whitman; Jihane Khalife; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Deedra Nicolet; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Meir Wetzler; Joseph O Moore; Jonathan E Kolitz; Maria R Baer; Andrew J Carroll; Richard A Larson; Michael A Caligiuri; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia and confer adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication.

Authors:  Peter Paschka; Richard F Schlenk; Verena I Gaidzik; Marianne Habdank; Jan Krönke; Lars Bullinger; Daniela Späth; Sabine Kayser; Manuela Zucknick; Katharina Götze; Heinz-A Horst; Ulrich Germing; Hartmut Döhner; Konstanze Döhner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 50.717

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Advances in the heterogeneity of KIT, FLT3, and RAS mutations (Review).

Authors:  Xi Quan; Jianchuan Deng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25

2.  Two rare cases of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3) and 1q duplication: case presentation and literature review.

Authors:  Meng Liu; Yuan Ren; Xianfu Wang; Xianglan Lu; Ming Li; Young Mi Kim; Shibo Li; Lijun Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.