| Literature DB >> 26980283 |
Christopher Maffeo1, Jejoong Yoo1, Aleksei Aksimentiev2.
Abstract
The DNA origami method has brought nanometer-precision fabrication to molecular biology labs, offering myriads of potential applications in the fields of synthetic biology, medicine, molecular computation, etc. Advancing the method further requires controlling self-assembly down to the atomic scale. Here we demonstrate a computational method that allows the equilibrium structure of a large, complex DNA origami object to be determined to atomic resolution. Through direct comparison with the results of cryo-electron microscopy, we demonstrate de novo reconstruction of a 4.7 megadalton pointer structure by means of fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Furthermore, we show that elastic network-guided simulations performed without solvent can yield similar accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost, making this method an attractive approach for prototyping and validation of self-assembled DNA nanostructures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26980283 PMCID: PMC4838381 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Structural models of DNA origami. (A) A three-dimensional (3D) model of the pointer object (25) built according to its idealized design. Each DNA helix is represented by a cylinder. (B) Cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of the DNA pointer structure (25). The object's structure is characterized by a 3D electron density map visualized in the figure as a surface of constant electron density. (C) All-atom model of the DNA origami object. Atoms comprising the scaffold and staple strands are shown as blue and white van der Waals (vdW) spheres.
Figure 2.Explicit solvent all-atom MD simulation of the pointer object. (A) Instantaneous conformations of the pointer object during a 200-ns MD trajectory. The DNA atoms are depicted as blue and white vdW spheres. Single-stranded DNA at the ends of the helices are not shown for clarity. This simulation trajectory is illustrated by Supplementary Movies 1–3. (B) Root mean square displacement (RMSD) of the pointer object's coordinates with respect to the pseudo-atomic model obtained from cryo-EM reconstruction (25). The RMSD was calculated using non-hydrogen atoms of the scaffold strand. The gray region indicates the part of the MD trajectory where harmonic or elastic restraints were applied to DNA. The inset illustrates the full extend of the explicit solvent model. (C) The dimensions of the pointer object relative to the cryo-EM derived model. The dimensions of the pointer structure along the x- and y-axes were defined as the center of mass (CoM) distances between the three center helices at the opposite faces of the pointer structure. The size along the z-axis was defined as the CoM distance between two terminal 10-bp slices of the same nine center helices (at the opposite faces of the structure). The background images define the x, y and z dimensions using a pointer structure. (D) The inter-helical distance map of the pointer structure. The color of each helix indicates its average separation from the neighboring helices. The top and bottom rows illustrate the inter-helical distances computed along the x and y dimensions of the structure, respectively. The left and right columns illustrate the inter-helical distances computed for the last frame of the explicit solvent MD trajectory and the cryo-EM derived structure, respectively. The inter-helical distances were calculated by averaging the CoM distances between adjacent 10-bp segments within the center 40 bp of the pointer object.
Figure 3.Elastic network-guided simulation of the pointer object. (A) Chickenwire representation of the DNA origami construct before (left) and after (right) a 1.7-ns elastic network-guided simulation. During the simulation, intra-helical elastic network restraints maintained basepairing and basestacking (represented with atomic detail in the lower magnified region), while inter-helical restraints (represented schematically in the upper magnified region) maintained the prescribed inter-helical distances. This simulation trajectory is illustrated by Supplementary Movies 4–6. (B) RMSD of the pointer object's coordinates with respect to the cryo-EM derived model during the elastic network-guided simulation. The inset shows the RMSD of the pointer object during explicit solvent simulations started using the configuration obtained at the end of the elastic network-guided run (blue) and the idealized conformation (red, same as in Figure 2B). (C) The dimensions of the simulated DNA origami object relative to the cryo-EM derived model. The object's dimensions along x, y and z axes were calculated as in Figure 2C. Each plot depicts the dimensions along one axis during explicit solvent simulations started using the configuration obtained at the end of the elastic network-guided run (thick lines) and the idealized conformation (thin lines, same as in Figure 2C). (D) The inter-helical distance map of the pointer structure. The color of each helix indicates its average separation from the neighboring helices. The maps were computed as described in the caption to Figure 2D. The simulated map characterizes the state obtained at the end of the elastic network-guided simulation. (E–G) Comparison between the simulated (blue) and cryo-EM derived (red) structures of the pointer object. The simulated structure characterizes the state obtained at the end of the elastic network-guided simulation. A movie comparing the structures is available in Supplementary Data (Movie 7). (E) The entire pointer object, viewed from the y axis. (F) A slice of the object showing the characteristic chickenwire pattern. (G) Spreading of the helices due to crossover omission in the design of the pointer structure. In panels E and F, the simulated and cryo-EM derived models were aligned according to the coordinates of the scaffold strands. (H) A scheme for characterizing a crossover geometry (25). Each crossover consists of four ‘legs’ that diverge from a central connection. The line connecting the CoM of basepairs within each helix at the junction defines the crossover vector x, depicted in dark gray. The four legs are associated with vectors a–d that are each given by the line connecting the CoM of one of the base pairs at the junction with the base pair located two base pairs away from the junction within the same duplex. These vectors are used to calculate the away-from-plane bend β. The vectors are then projected into the plane defined by x before the leg-to-leg inclination angle γ and in-plane helix bend, α, are obtained. (I) Distributions of the crossover angles. The crossover angles, defined in panel H, were calculated for the cryo-EM derived model (pink) and for the model derived by averaging the MD trajectory (blue). The distributions of the in-plane and away-from-plane bends computed using instantaneous snapshots of the MD trajectory (gray) are significantly broader because of the thermal fluctuations.