Literature DB >> 26979832

The large contribution of twins to neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in The Gambia, a 5-year prospective study.

Reiko Miyahara1,2, Momodou Jasseh1, Grant Austin Mackenzie1,3,4, Christian Bottomley5, M Jahangir Hossain1, Brian M Greenwood5, Umberto D'Alessandro1,5, Anna Roca6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high twinning rate and an increased risk of mortality among twins contribute to the high burden of infant mortality in Africa. This study examined the contribution of twins to neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in The Gambia, and evaluated factors that contribute to the excess mortality among twins.
METHODS: We analysed data from the Basse Health and Demographic Surveillance System (BHDSS) collected from January 2009 to December 2013. Demographic and epidemiological variables were assessed for their association with mortality in different age groups.
RESULTS: We included 32,436 singletons and 1083 twins in the analysis (twining rate 16.7/1000 deliveries). Twins represented 11.8 % of all neonatal deaths and 7.8 % of post-neonatal deaths. Mortality among twins was higher than in singletons [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.33 (95 % CI: 3.09, 6.06) in the neonatal period and 2.61 (95 % CI: 1.85, 3.68) in the post-neonatal period]. Post-neonatal mortality among twins increased in girls (P for interaction = 0.064), being born during the dry season (P for interaction = 0.030) and lacking access to clean water (P for interaction = 0.042).
CONCLUSION: Mortality among twins makes a significant contribution to the high burden of neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in The Gambia and preventive interventions targeting twins should be prioritized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HDSS; Mortality; Neonatal; Post-neonatal; Risk factors; Twins

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979832      PMCID: PMC4791939          DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0573-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pediatr        ISSN: 1471-2431            Impact factor:   2.125


Background

During the past few decades, under-5 year mortality has decreased worldwide, with similar trends in high, middle and low-income countries [1]. In sub-Saharan Africa, under-5 mortality has declined significantly since 2000, although rates are still unacceptably high. The decline in neonatal mortality has been slower than in older children and thus, the relative contribution of neonates to under-5 deaths has increased. In 2013, almost half of under-5 deaths worldwide were neonates [1]. Twins have an increased risk of death during the neonatal period, and this extends at least until the first anniversary. The high rate of mortality in twins is probably due to complications at birth and early life [2-4], including prematurity [5, 6] and low birth weight [7, 8], and cultural beliefs [9] which can influence growth patterns and gender-biased care. Twins require specialist health care in early life, which is often not available in low-income countries. In West Africa, where health care resources are limited and neonatal and infant mortality are high, the twinning rate (15–18 per 1000 live births) is higher than in other regions such as Eastern Europe (below 9 per 1000 live births) or South and South-East Asia (below 9 per 1000 live births) [10]. A study conducted in The Gambia between 1989 and 1992 showed a twinning rate of 15 per 1000 live births and double the risk of death in this group during infancy [11]. Since 1992, under-five mortality rate has declined in The Gambia by more than 50 %, with a similar decrease among infants (48 %) but there has been less of decline in neonatal mortality (18 %) [12]. The mortality pattern in twins over this period has not yet been documented in the country. To design health interventions that target twins, it is necessary to understand the risk factors for mortality in this group. The aim of this study was therefore to examine excess mortality among twins in The Gambia during the neonatal (within 28 days after birth) and post-neonatal periods (29 days to 365 days) between 2009 and 2013; and to assess epidemiological and demographic risk factors for mortality in this group.

Methods

Data source

We used data from the Basse Health and Demographic Surveillance System (BHDSS), which covers the south bank of the Upper River Region of The Gambia and included more than 170,000 individuals during the study period. In the BHDSS, trained field workers visit each household every four months and update demographic events in every household (i.e. pregnancies, births, deaths, in and out migrations). Additional information is transcribed from the antenatal cards and vaccination cards. The procedure is the same as that used in another demographic surveillance site in The Gambia, Farafenni HDSS, and described elsewhere [13]. Socio-economic data were collected in a survey conducted in 2011. The information collected in this survey included: (i) asset ownership (radio, television, video, car, motor cycle, refrigerator, bicycle), (ii) household material (such as roof, wall, floor), and (iii) toilet facility. We developed a socio-economical status (SES) index using theses data by primary component analysis. The SES index was categorized into 5 quintiles from 1st poorest to 5th wealthy [14]. Every pregnancy identified by field workers during demographic update rounds of the HDSS is followed up until termination. Information solicited from the woman on the outcome of the pregnancy include number of children resulting from the pregnancy and the number born alive. Therefore, pregnancies which terminated with two or more children born were classified as multiple births regardless of the number born alive; and all those with only one child born were confirmed as singletons. Deaths during the neonatal and the post-neonatal period were identified during routine household visits.

Statistical analyses

All children born in the BHDSS from January 2009 to December 2013 were included in the analysis; triplets were excluded. Mortality rates for neonatal and post-neonatal periods were calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of live births. We compared the rate of mortality in twins and singletons using logistic regression to adjust for sex, ethnicity, season of birth, maternal age, birth order, SES index, access to clean water and birth interval (Model 2). Because many children were missing data on SES index, access to clean water and birth intervals, we also conducted an analysis (Model 1) where these variables were excluded from the model. The influence of socio-demographic factors on mortality in twins was compared to their influence in singletons. We used logistic regression to test for effect modification (i.e., different odds ratios in twins and singletons) and adjust for confounding. Confidence interval and p-values were computed using cluster-robust variance estimates to adjust for clustering by household. The probability of monozygotic and dizygotic twins were calculated using Weinberg zygosity estimation [15]. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 12. This study was approved by Gambia Government/Medical Research Council Joint Ethics Committee. Verbal consent of participants of HDSS was obtained by village leaders and individual household heads for household members.

Results

Between January 2009 and December 2013, a total of 34,335 newborns were registered in the BHDSS. After excluding 801 children without information on multiple birth and 15 triplets, 33,519 children were included in the analysis; 1083 twins (3.2 %) and 32,436 singletons (Fig. 1). The twinning rate was 16.7/1000 deliveries of live births including the 17 deliveries that one still birth in pairs. There were 400 children in boy/girl pairs (37.5 %), 294 in boy pairs (27.6 %) and 372 in girl pairs (34.9 %) among the 1066 study twins with data on gender (98.5 %). Thus, the estimated probabilities of monozygotic and dizygotic twins were 25.0 % and 75.0 %, respectively. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the twins and singletons born during the study period. Compared to singletons, twins were more likely to be female (OR = 1.17, 95 % CI: 1.02, 1.34, P = 0.022), to be born in the wet season (OR = 0.79, 95 % CI: 0.66, 0.93, P = 0.006), to have mothers older than 25 years of age (OR = 1.95, 95 % CI: 1.62, 2.35, P <0.001), and to have mothers who had had at least one previous delivery (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI: 1.17, 1.67, P <0.001).
Fig. 1

Flowchart of study population in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013

Table 1

Characteristics of twins and singletons in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013 (N = 33,519)

Singletons (N = 32,436)Twins (N = 1083)
No.%No.%OR a 95 % CIb P value
Sex
Boys1638650.550446.51 (reference)
Girls1604949.557953.51.171.02–1.340.022
Ethnicity
Serahule1460445.051347.41 (reference)
Mandinka672120.723221.40.980.84–1.150.828
Fula1050832.432129.60.870.75–1.000.053
Others5971.8171.60.810.50–1.320.401
Region
Rural2863388.397089.61 (reference)
Urban380311.711310.40.880.67–1.150.351
Season of birth d
Wet1729453.364159.21 (reference)
Dry1514246.744240.80.790.67–0.930.006
Birth order
11439544.439336.31 (reference)
21246138.445041.61.321.09–1.600.005
3+558017.224012.21.581.25–1.98<0.001
Mother age
<20481015.0807.51 (reference)
20–241008731.424923.21.481.04–2.110.024
25–29747023.326524.72.121.48–3.04<0.001
30–34577018.028226.32.942.06–4.19<0.001
≧35397812.419618.32.962.04–4.29<0.001
Mother education level
No560017.316215.01 (reference)
Religious1720153.063358.51.281.00–1.640.052
Basic26658.2676.20.870.58–1.310.517
Senior6792.1201.91.020.50–2.110.948
Unknown629119.420118.61.110.82–1.500.489
Birth interval (<2 years) e
≧2 years2911090.298191.61 (reference)
<2 years31819.9908.40.840.67–1.050.117
Access to clean water f
Yes2372386.579385.61 (reference)
No370013.513314.41.080.82–1.410.603
SES index g
1st/Poorest5,15020.315918.61 (reference)
2nd6,79726.822125.81.050.77–1.430.742
3rd3,25012.812714.81.270.90–1.770.180
4th5,12920.219522.81.230.90–1.670.194
5th/wealthy5,06119.915418.00.990.71–1.360.930

a Odds Ratio, b 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household

c P value were tested by Wald test with GEE accounting for clustering by households

d Wet season is from June to October, and Dry season is from November to May

f Clean water is Tap water (Public, in dwelling/compound) and Protected well (N = 28,349)

e N = 33,362, g N = 26,242

Flowchart of study population in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013 Characteristics of twins and singletons in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013 (N = 33,519) a Odds Ratio, b 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household c P value were tested by Wald test with GEE accounting for clustering by households d Wet season is from June to October, and Dry season is from November to May f Clean water is Tap water (Public, in dwelling/compound) and Protected well (N = 28,349) e N = 33,362, g N = 26,242 Overall, we recorded 1082 deaths during the follow up period (977 singletons and 105 twins). During the neonatal period, mortality among twins was 55.4 per 1000 live births (95 % CI: 41.8, 69.0) and among singletons 13.8 per 1000 live births (95 % CI: 12.5, 15.1). Twins’ deaths represented 11.8 % of all neonatal deaths and 7.8 % of all post-neonatal deaths (Table 2). Up to sixty percent of twin deaths during the neonatal period occurred within 2 days of birth, compared with 46.2 % of deaths in singletons. Twins had about six times higher risk of death within 2 days after the birth compared to singletons (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 5.71, 95 % CI: 3.67, 8.89, P < 0.001). The risk of death among twins compared to singletons was higher during the neonatal period (AOR = 4.33, 95 % CI: 3.10, 6.07, P <0.001) and post-neonatal period (AOR = 2.61, 95 % CI: 1.85, 3.68, P <0.001) (Table 2). Among twins, pairs of concordant and discordant sex showed similar mortality [AOR in neonatal period = 1.07, 95 % CI; 0.60, 1.91 and AOR in post-neonatal period = 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.39, 1.37].
Table 2

Mortality rate among twins (N = 1083) and singletons (N = 32,436) in the neonatal (0–28 days), post-neonatal (29–365 days) period and infancy (0–365 days) in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013

No. deathsDeaths per 1,000 live births95 % CI c OR a 95 % CI c Adjusted OR b (Model1)95 % CI c Adjusted OR c (Model2)95 % CI d
NeonatalAll e 50815.213.916.5
Singletons44813.812.515.11 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Twins6055.441.869.04.193.01–5.824.333.09–6.064.863.38–6.99
Post neonatalAll e 57417.115.718.5
Singletons52916.314.917.71 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Twins4541.629.753.42.611.86–3.672.611.85–3.682.721.84–4.01
InfancyAll e 108232.330.434.2
Singletons97730.128.332.01 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
Twins10597.079.3114.63.462.68–4.453.512.71–4.553.832.87–5.11

a Odds Ratio

b Odds ratio for twins compared to singletons adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order (N = 33,088)

c Odds ratio for twins compared to singletons adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order, birth interval, access to water, SES index (N = 25,835)

d 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household

e Singletons and Twins

Mortality rate among twins (N = 1083) and singletons (N = 32,436) in the neonatal (0–28 days), post-neonatal (29–365 days) period and infancy (0–365 days) in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013 a Odds Ratio b Odds ratio for twins compared to singletons adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order (N = 33,088) c Odds ratio for twins compared to singletons adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order, birth interval, access to water, SES index (N = 25,835) d 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household e Singletons and Twins There was weak evidence that some risk factors for mortality had different effects in twins and singletons only during the post-neonatal period. During this period, the increased risk of mortality among twins was higher in girls than boys (P for interaction 0.064), being born during the dry season (P for interaction 0.030) and living in a house with lack of access to clean water (P for interaction 0.042) (Table 3).
Table 3

Risk factors for mortality in singletons and twins in the neonatal (0–28 days) and post-neonatal period (29–365 days) period in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013

Singletons (N = 32,436)Twins (N = 1083)
Univariate modelMultivariate modelUnivariate modelMultivariate model
Neonatal deathOR a 95 % CI c AOR b 95 % CI c OR a 95 % CI c AOR b 95 % CI c P for Interaction d
SexBoys1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.459
Girls0.810.67–0.970.810.67–0.980.990.58–1.701.010.59–1.72
EthnicitySerahule1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.455
Fula1.060.83–1.351.010.85–1.391.690.75–3.841.690.74–3.83
Mandinka1.110.90–1.381.130.91–1.411.200.55–2.621.210.55–2.63
Season of birth e Wet1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.194
Dry0.790.65–0.950.780.64–0.941.200.65–2.211.190.65–2.21
Access to clean water f Yes1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.231
No0.960.72–1.290.960.71–1.281.650.73–3.731.630.71–3.75
Birth order11 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.339
2+0.820.68–0.990.790.64–0.981.150.60–2.201.010.57–2.14
Birth intervals g ≧2 years1 (reference)1 (reference)0.258
<2 years1.060.78–1.441.240.88–1.732.030.81–5.102.150.86–5.36
SES index h Poor1 (reference)1 (reference)0.236
Middle0.800.63–1.020.800.63–1.020.550.24–1.250.570.25–1.30
Wealthy0.760.57–1.010.770.56–1.060.470.15–1.490.460.14–1.46
Post neonatal death
SexBoys1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.064
Girls0.960.80–1.140.950.80–1.141.780.92–3.431.810.94–3.49
EthnicitySerahule1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.382
Fula1.361.08–1.711.361.08–1.700.560.24–1.330.550.23–1.30
Mandinka1.351.10–1.651.331.09–1.630.720.33–1.590.750.34–1.65
Season of birth e Wet1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.030
Dry0.870.73–1.030.860.72–1.021.860.95–3.661.860.95–3.65
Access to clean water f Yes1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.042
No0.800.59–1.070.770.57–1.041.910.84–4.361.920.84–4.42
Birth order11 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)0.221
2+0.880.74–1.040.910.76–1.100.580.30–1.140.590.30–1.16
Birth intervals g ≧2 years1 (reference)0.804
<2 years1.220.94–1.601.421.07–1.881.090.71–0.313.910.33–4.35
SES index h Poor1 (reference)1 (reference)0.182
Middle0.770.62–0.970.800.64–1.012.150.95–4.872.140.94–4.88
Wealthy0.640.48–0.850.670.49–0.901.800.57–5.601.770.57–5.54

a Odds Ratio

b Odds ratio adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order

c 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household

d P value for interaction comparing AOR in singletons and twins

e Wet season is from June to October, and Dry season is from November to May

f Clean water is Tap water (Public, in dwelling/compound) and Protected well (N = 28,048)

g N = 33,362

h Quintiles of SES score grouped: 1&2 poor, 3&4 middle, 5 wealthy (N = 25,835)

Risk factors for mortality in singletons and twins in the neonatal (0–28 days) and post-neonatal period (29–365 days) period in the Basse HDSS, The Gambia, 2009–2013 a Odds Ratio b Odds ratio adjusted for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, season of birth, mother age, birth order c 95 % confidence interval adjusted for clustering by household d P value for interaction comparing AOR in singletons and twins e Wet season is from June to October, and Dry season is from November to May f Clean water is Tap water (Public, in dwelling/compound) and Protected well (N = 28,048) g N = 33,362 h Quintiles of SES score grouped: 1&2 poor, 3&4 middle, 5 wealthy (N = 25,835)

Discussion

Our study has shown that mortality among twins remains very high in The Gambia during the neonatal and post-neonatal periods. Because of the high twinning rate, twins contributed to almost 12 and 8 % of neonatal and post-neonatal deaths respectively in the study area. During the neonatal period, mortality among twins was at least four times higher than among singletons, and this higher risk of death continued until the end of infancy. During the post-neonatal period, the excess risk of death among twins increased in girls, among those resident in a house with a lack of access to clean water and among those born during the dry season. Although overall neonatal and infant mortality has dramatically decreased in The Gambia during the last decades, the high risk of mortality among twins appears not to have fallen substantially. In the present study, the odds of neonatal and post-neonatal mortality were 4.19 and 2.61 times increased in twins, comparable to a previous study in The Gambia, (RR = 6.1 and RR = 2.9 during the early and late neonatal periods and RR = 1.6 during the post-neonatal period) [11]. As neonatal and post-neonatal deaths are relatively rare events, those RR should be comparable to our OR. We found that the increased rate of mortality among twins are similar to that estimated from pooled data from Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia, where the AOR was 6.24 (95 % CI: 5.02, 7.77) for neonatal mortality and 3.05 (95 % CI: 2.36, 3.95) for post-neonatal mortality [16]. In another meta-analysis of 25 demographic health surveys conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, the AOR was 5.55 (95 % CI: 4.26, 7.23) for neonatal mortality and 2.63 (95 % CI: 2.37, 2.90) for post-neonatal mortality [3]. The twinning rate continues to be high in The Gambia (16.7 per 1000 deliveries) compared to the other regions [10] and is similar to that found in a previous study conducted in the country (15 per 1000 live births) [11] and also similar to other West African countries [18 per 1000 deliveries in Guinea-Bissau [8], 18.5 per 1000 deliveries in Nigeria [4]] . Dizygotic twin pregnancies represent more than two thirds of the overall twinning rate in our study as previously shown in the country [11]. The risk factors for twinning that we found in our study are consistent with previous literature in Africa and other regions, which include older maternal age [3], being born during the dry season [17, 18] and having at least one older siblings [19]. As expected, the influence of birth order was diminished after adjusting for maternal age. In contrast to the previous study in The Gambia, which showed a significantly lower twinning rate among Mandinkas (10.4 per 1000 deliveries) [11], we did not observe any significant difference in twinning rate by ethnicity. We found weak evidence for an increased risk of mortality among girl twins that was higher than among boy twins during the post-neonatal period (P for interaction = 0.064). In previous reports from Senegal, mortality among pairs of boy twins was 5.4 times higher (95 % CI: 1.7, 17.0) than pairs of girl twins during the post-neonatal period [20]. Also, pooled Demographic and Health Surveys data from 31 sub-Saharan African countries showed the increased risk of mortality among twins was more marked in boys compared to girls [21]. In general, higher mortality among boys is explained by the biological and immunological reasons [22-25]. Higher mortality among girl twins in post-neonatal period, as we found in our study, has been attributed in other countries to gender discrimination in health seeking behaviour [26] and nutritional status [27]. Season of birth also increased the risk of mortality among twins in post-neonatal period. Among Gambian children, the rainy season increased the risk of low birth weight and as a consequence infant mortality [28-31]. During the post-neonatal period, we have observed an increased risk of mortality in twins being born during the dry season. They should start eating food during the following rainy season when shortage of food is more common. Malnutrition is a more prevalent cause of death among twins than singletons during this age group [11] and therefore, the shortage of food during the post-neonatal period may have a more detrimental effect on twins than singletons. Our findings also indicate that lack of access to clean water during the post-neonatal period increases the risk of death more in twins than singletons. Previous research in Guinea-Bissau [32] and in Malawi [6] showed that twins start complementary food significantly earlier than singletons. If that is the case in The Gambia, it could explain the importance of the lack of access to clean water in increasing the risk of death among twins, as they are exposed from a very early age to contaminated weaning foods which are a risk factor of infectious diseases (especially gastroenteritis which in turn causes malnutrition) [33]. The analysis presented here used the HDSS for evaluating trends on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality among twins. The major strengths of this analysis are the consistency in data collection over the study period and the large denominator that allow detailed comparisons and assessment of risk factors and interactions. Using the HDSS has also important limitations. The BHDSS is updated every four months, and pregnancies and neonatal deaths might have been missed. Furthermore, the twinning rate and twin mortality might have been underestimated if fieldworkers missed neonatal deaths and misclassified the surviving twins as singletons. This may have occurred by the small number of stillbirths that we counted among twins. We systematically collected information on the number of newborns regardless of their status to minimise this potential misclassification.

Conclusion

Twins are at very high risk of death during the neonatal and post-neonatal periods in The Gambia. Girls, being born in dry season and lack of access to clean water might be associated with increased risk of death among twins during the post-neonatal period. Efforts should be made to identify twin pregnancies during antenatal care visits and to provide regular home visits, maternal education [34] and food supplementation to the women [31] before and after delivery.
  33 in total

1.  Seasonal variation of livebirths, stillbirths, extramarital births and twin maternities in Switzerland.

Authors:  A W Eriksson; J Fellman
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Sex hormones and the immune response in humans.

Authors:  Annechien Bouman; Maas Jan Heineman; Marijke M Faas
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Differential effects of seasonality on preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction in rural Africans.

Authors:  Pura Rayco-Solon; Anthony J Fulford; Andrew M Prentice
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Size and morbidity in Malawian twins.

Authors:  B F Kalanda; F H Verhoeff; B J Brabin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  A comparison of recent trends in infant mortality among twins and singletons.

Authors:  J D Parker; K C Schoendorf; J L Kiely
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Statistical analysis of the seasonal variation in the twinning rate.

Authors:  J Fellman; A W Eriksson
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  1999-03

7.  Postneonatal and child mortality among twins in Southern and Eastern Africa.

Authors:  A Justesen; A Kunst
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Risk factors of infant and child mortality in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Heiko Becher; Olaf Müller; Albrecht Jahn; Adjima Gbangou; Gisela Kynast-Wolf; Bocar Kouyaté
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  A population-based study of effect of multiple birth on infant mortality in Nigeria.

Authors:  Olalekan A Uthman; Mubashir B Uthman; Ismail Yahaya
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Birth season and environmental influences on blood leucocyte and lymphocyte subpopulations in rural Gambian infants.

Authors:  Andrew C Collinson; Pa Tamba Ngom; Sophie E Moore; Gareth Morgan; Andrew M Prentice
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.615

View more
  7 in total

1.  Household air pollution from cooking and risk of adverse health and birth outcomes in Bangladesh: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Md Nuruzzaman Khan; Cherri Zhang B Nurs; M Mofizul Islam; Md Rafiqul Islam; Md Mizanur Rahman
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.984

2.  National policies and care provision in pregnancy and childbirth for twins in Eastern and Southern Africa: A mixed-methods multi-country study.

Authors:  Claudia Hanson; Stephen Munjanja; Agnes Binagwaho; Bellington Vwalika; Andrea B Pembe; Elsa Jacinto; George K Chilinda; Kateri B Donahoe; Sikolia Z Wanyonyi; Peter Waiswa; Muchabayiwa F Gidiri; Lenka Benova
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Stillbirths, Neonatal Morbidity, and Mortality in Health-Facility Deliveries in Urban Gambia.

Authors:  Bully Camara; Claire Oluwalana; Reiko Miyahara; Alyson Lush; Beate Kampmann; Kebba Manneh; Uduak Okomo; Umberto D'Alessandro; Anna Roca
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Risk factors of infant mortality in rural The Gambia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Jarde; Nuredin Ibrahim Mohammed; Pierre Gomez; Pa Cheboh Saine; Umberto D'Alessandro; Anna Roca
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  Prevalence and outcomes of twin pregnancies in Botswana: a national birth outcomes surveillance study.

Authors:  Arielle Isaacson; Modiegi Diseko; Gloria Mayondi; Judith Mabuta; Sonya Davey; Mompati Mmalane; Joseph Makhema; Denise L Jacobson; Rebecca Luckett; Roger L Shapiro; Rebecca Zash
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cause and risk factors of early neonatal death in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Neamin Tesfay; Rozina Tariku; Alemu Zenebe; Zewdnesh Dejene; Fitsum Woldeyohannes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Protocol for a randomised trial of early kangaroo mother care compared to standard care on survival of pre-stabilised preterm neonates in The Gambia (eKMC).

Authors:  Helen Brotherton; Abdou Gai; Cally J Tann; Ahmadou Lamin Samateh; Anna C Seale; Syed M A Zaman; Simon Cousens; Anna Roca; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.