Varun K Phadke1, Robert A Bednarczyk2, Daniel A Salmon3, Saad B Omer4. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia3Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Institute for Vaccine Safety, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia3Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia5Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia6Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Parents hesitant to vaccinate their children may delay routine immunizations or seek exemptions from state vaccine mandates. Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States have drawn attention to this phenomenon. Improved understanding of the association between vaccine refusal and the epidemiology of these diseases is needed. OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature to evaluate the association between vaccine delay, refusal, or exemption and the epidemiology of measles and pertussis, 2 vaccine-preventable diseases with recent US outbreaks. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Search of PubMed through November 30, 2015, for reports of US measles outbreaks that have occurred since measles was declared eliminated in the United States (after January 1, 2000), endemic and epidemic pertussis since the lowest point in US pertussis incidence (after January 1, 1977), and for studies that assessed disease risk in the context of vaccine delay or exemption. FINDINGS: We identified 18 published measles studies (9 annual summaries and 9 outbreak reports), which described 1416 measles cases (individual age range, 2 weeks-84 years; 178 cases younger than 12 months) and more than half (56.8%) had no history of measles vaccination. Of the 970 measles cases with detailed vaccination data, 574 cases were unvaccinated despite being vaccine eligible and 405 (70.6%) of these had nonmedical exemptions (eg, exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons, as opposed to medical contraindications; 41.8% of total). Among 32 reports of pertussis outbreaks, which included 10,609 individuals for whom vaccination status was reported (age range, 10 days-87 years), the 5 largest statewide epidemics had substantial proportions (range, 24%-45%) of unvaccinated or undervaccinated individuals. However, several pertussis outbreaks also occurred in highly vaccinated populations, indicating waning immunity. Nine reports (describing 12 outbreaks) provided detailed vaccination data on unimmunized cases; among 8 of these outbreaks from 59% through 93% of unvaccinated individuals were intentionally unvaccinated. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A substantial proportion of the US measles cases in the era after elimination were intentionally unvaccinated. The phenomenon of vaccine refusal was associated with an increased risk for measles among people who refuse vaccines and among fully vaccinated individuals. Although pertussis resurgence has been attributed to waning immunity and other factors, vaccine refusal was still associated with an increased risk for pertussis in some populations.
IMPORTANCE: Parents hesitant to vaccinate their children may delay routine immunizations or seek exemptions from state vaccine mandates. Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States have drawn attention to this phenomenon. Improved understanding of the association between vaccine refusal and the epidemiology of these diseases is needed. OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature to evaluate the association between vaccine delay, refusal, or exemption and the epidemiology of measles and pertussis, 2 vaccine-preventable diseases with recent US outbreaks. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Search of PubMed through November 30, 2015, for reports of US measles outbreaks that have occurred since measles was declared eliminated in the United States (after January 1, 2000), endemic and epidemic pertussis since the lowest point in US pertussis incidence (after January 1, 1977), and for studies that assessed disease risk in the context of vaccine delay or exemption. FINDINGS: We identified 18 published measles studies (9 annual summaries and 9 outbreak reports), which described 1416 measles cases (individual age range, 2 weeks-84 years; 178 cases younger than 12 months) and more than half (56.8%) had no history of measles vaccination. Of the 970 measles cases with detailed vaccination data, 574 cases were unvaccinated despite being vaccine eligible and 405 (70.6%) of these had nonmedical exemptions (eg, exemptions for religious or philosophical reasons, as opposed to medical contraindications; 41.8% of total). Among 32 reports of pertussis outbreaks, which included 10,609 individuals for whom vaccination status was reported (age range, 10 days-87 years), the 5 largest statewide epidemics had substantial proportions (range, 24%-45%) of unvaccinated or undervaccinated individuals. However, several pertussis outbreaks also occurred in highly vaccinated populations, indicating waning immunity. Nine reports (describing 12 outbreaks) provided detailed vaccination data on unimmunized cases; among 8 of these outbreaks from 59% through 93% of unvaccinated individuals were intentionally unvaccinated. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A substantial proportion of the US measles cases in the era after elimination were intentionally unvaccinated. The phenomenon of vaccine refusal was associated with an increased risk for measles among people who refuse vaccines and among fully vaccinated individuals. Although pertussis resurgence has been attributed to waning immunity and other factors, vaccine refusal was still associated with an increased risk for pertussis in some populations.
Authors: Jessica E Atwell; Josh Van Otterloo; Jennifer Zipprich; Kathleen Winter; Kathleen Harriman; Daniel A Salmon; Neal A Halsey; Saad B Omer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: N Khetsuriani; K Bisgard; D R Prevots; M Brennan; M Wharton; S Pandya; A Poppe; K Flora; G Dameron; P Quinlisk Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: S F Davis; R W Sutter; P M Strebel; C Orton; V Alexander; G N Sanden; G H Cassell; W L Thacker; S L Cochi Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: M D Decker; K M Edwards; M C Steinhoff; M B Rennels; M E Pichichero; J A Englund; E L Anderson; M A Deloria; G F Reed Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer B Rosen; Jennifer S Rota; Carole J Hickman; Sun B Sowers; Sara Mercader; Paul A Rota; William J Bellini; Ada J Huang; Margaret K Doll; Jane R Zucker; Christopher M Zimmerman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: James Matthias; Cristina Dusek; Scott P Pritchard; Laura Rutledge; Paula Kinchen; Mark Lander Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Paula M Frew; Raphiel Murden; C Christina Mehta; Allison T Chamberlain; Alan R Hinman; Glen Nowak; Judith Mendel; Ann Aikin; Laura A Randall; Allison L Hargreaves; Saad B Omer; Walter A Orenstein; Robert A Bednarczyk Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: S Cassandra Pingali; Paul L Delamater; Alison M Buttenheim; Daniel A Salmon; Nicola P Klein; Saad B Omer Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew J Leidner; Erin D Maughan; Adam Bjork; Carla Black; Donna Mazyck; J Michael Underwood Journal: J Sch Nurs Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Natalia V Oster; Emily C Williams; Joseph M Unger; Polly A Newcomb; Elizabeth N Jacobson; M Patricia deHart; Janet A Englund; Annika M Hofstetter Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 5.043