Literature DB >> 26975326

HT-COMET: a novel automated approach for high throughput assessment of human sperm chromatin quality.

Océane Albert1, Wolfgang E Reintsch2, Peter Chan3, Bernard Robaire4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can we make the comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) for human sperm a more accurate and informative high throughput assay? SUMMARY ANSWER: We developed a standardized automated high throughput comet (HT-COMET) assay for human sperm that improves its accuracy and efficiency, and could be of prognostic value to patients in the fertility clinic. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The comet assay involves the collection of data on sperm DNA damage at the level of the single cell, allowing the use of samples from severe oligozoospermic patients. However, this makes comet scoring a low throughput procedure that renders large cohort analyses tedious. Furthermore, the comet assay comes with an inherent vulnerability to variability. Our objective is to develop an automated high throughput comet assay for human sperm that will increase both its accuracy and efficiency. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study comprised two distinct components: a HT-COMET technical optimization section based on control versus DNAse treatment analyses ( ITALIC! n = 3-5), and a cross-sectional study on 123 men presenting to a reproductive center with sperm concentrations categorized as severe oligozoospermia, oligozoospermia or normozoospermia. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Sperm chromatin quality was measured using the comet assay: on classic 2-well slides for software comparison; on 96-well slides for HT-COMET optimization; after exposure to various concentrations of a damage-inducing agent, DNAse, using HT-COMET; on 123 subjects with different sperm concentrations using HT-COMET. Data from the 123 subjects were correlated to classic semen quality parameters and plotted as single-cell data in individual DNA damage profiles. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We have developed a standard automated HT-COMET procedure for human sperm. It includes automated scoring of comets by a fully integrated high content screening setup that compares well with the most commonly used semi-manual analysis software. Using this method, a cross-sectional study on 123 men showed no significant correlation between sperm concentration and sperm DNA damage, confirming the existence of hidden chromatin damage in men with apparently normal semen characteristics, and a significant correlation between percentage DNA in the tail and percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa. Finally, the use of DNA damage profiles helped to distinguish subjects between and within sperm concentration categories, and allowed a determination of the proportion of highly damaged cells. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitations of the HT-COMET are the high, yet indispensable, investment in an automated liquid handling system and heating block to ensure accuracy, and the availability of an automated plate reading microscope and analysis software. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This standardized HT-COMET assay offers many advantages, including higher accuracy and evenness due to automation of sensitive steps, a 14.4-fold increase in sample analysis capacity, and an imaging and scoring time of 1 min/well. Overall, HT-COMET offers a decrease in total experimental time of more than 90%. Hence, this assay constitutes a more efficient option to assess sperm chromatin quality, paves the way to using this assay to screen large cohorts, and holds prognostic value for infertile patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funded by the CIHR Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health (IHDCYH; RHF 100625). O.A. is a fellow supported by the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS) and the CIHR Training Program in Reproduction, Early Development, and the Impact on Health (REDIH). B.R. is a James McGill Professor. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage profiling; fertility; fertility prognosis; high throughput comet assay; sperm DNA damage; sperm chromatin quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975326      PMCID: PMC4840022          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  23 in total

Review 1.  Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation part III: the comet assay as an alternative to in vitro clastogenicity tests for early drug candidate selection.

Authors:  Irene Witte; Ulla Plappert; Hartmut de Wall; Andreas Hartmann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility?

Authors:  Sheena E M Lewis
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity.

Authors:  Günter Speit; Marie Vasquez; Andreas Hartmann
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  High-throughput comet assay using 96 minigels.

Authors:  Kristine B Gutzkow; Torgrim M Langleite; Silja Meier; Anne Graupner; Andrew R Collins; Gunnar Brunborg
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility.

Authors:  Kiran P Nallella; Rakesh K Sharma; Nabil Aziz; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  Peggy L Olive; Judit P Banáth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  The effect of ascorbate and alpha-tocopherol supplementation in vitro on DNA integrity and hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  E T Donnelly; N McClure; S E Lewis
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 8.  The comet assay: topical issues.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins; Amaia Azqueta Oscoz; Gunnar Brunborg; Isabel Gaivão; Lisa Giovannelli; Marcin Kruszewski; Catherine C Smith; Rudolf Stetina
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Performance of the comet assay in a high-throughput version.

Authors:  A Stang; I Witte
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study.

Authors:  Aleksander Giwercman; Lars Lindstedt; Mattias Larsson; Mona Bungum; Marcello Spano; Richard J Levine; Lars Rylander
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2009-10-15
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

Review 2.  Sperm DNA damage and its role in IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  Phil Vu Bach; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2016-12-05

Review 3.  Sperm DNA integrity and male infertility: a narrative review and guide for the reproductive physicians.

Authors:  Ala'a Farkouh; Gianmaria Salvio; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Ramadan Saleh; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.