Literature DB >> 9887161

Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group.

J A Baron1, M Beach, J S Mandel, R U van Stolk, R W Haile, R S Sandler, R Rothstein, R W Summers, D C Snover, G J Beck, J H Bond, E R Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic evidence suggests that calcium may help prevent colorectal adenomas. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of supplementation with calcium carbonate on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 930 subjects (mean age, 61 years; 72 percent men) with a recent history of colorectal adenomas to receive either calcium carbonate (3 g [1200 mg of elemental calcium] daily) or placebo, with follow-up colonoscopies one and four years after the qualifying examination. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects in whom at least one adenoma was detected after the first follow-up endoscopy but up to (and including) the second follow-up examination. Risk ratios for the recurrence of adenomas were adjusted for age, sex, lifetime number of adenomas before the study, clinical center, and length of the surveillance period.
RESULTS: The subjects in the calcium group had a lower risk of recurrent adenomas. Among the 913 subjects who underwent at least one study colonoscopy, the adjusted risk ratio for any recurrence of adenoma with calcium as compared with placebo was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.03). The main analysis was based on the 832 subjects (409 in the calcium group and 423 in the placebo group) who completed both follow-up examinations. At least one adenoma was diagnosed between the first and second follow-up endoscopies in 127 subjects in the calcium group (31 percent) and 159 subjects in the placebo group (38 percent); the adjusted risk ratio was 0.81 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.99; P=0.04). The adjusted ratio of the average number of adenomas in the calcium group to that in the placebo group was 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.96; P=0.02). The effect of calcium was independent of initial dietary fat and calcium intake.
CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplementation is associated with a significant - though moderate - reduction in the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9887161     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  184 in total

Review 1.  Chemoprevention of breast and colon cancer.

Authors:  F L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Update of preclinical and human studies of calcium and colon cancer prevention.

Authors:  Martin Lipkin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Nutritional strategies in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J B Mason; Y i Kim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-08

Review 4.  Most effective colon cancer chemopreventive agents in rats: a systematic review of aberrant crypt foci and tumor data, ranked by potency.

Authors:  Denis E Corpet; Sylviane Taché
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.900

5.  Polymorphic variation in the GC and CASR genes and associations with vitamin D metabolite concentration and metachronous colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hibler; Chengcheng Hu; Peter W Jurutka; Maria E Martinez; Elizabeth T Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-02

7.  Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: it's time to act.

Authors:  Richard E Schabas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Dietary supplements and cancer prevention: balancing potential benefits against proven harms.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; Elizabeth T Jacobs; John A Baron; James R Marshall; Tim Byers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Ruiyun Jiang; Dennis J Ahnen; John H Bond; Timothy R Church; Douglas J Robertson; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Elizabeth T Jacobs; David S Alberts; E Robert Greenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  The association of age and race and the risk of large bowel polyps.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Carol A Burke; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Fred Saibil; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.