Literature DB >> 18347350

Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years.

Adeyinka O Laiyemo1, Gwen Murphy, Paul S Albert, Leah B Sansbury, Zhuoqiao Wang, Amanda J Cross, Pamela M Marcus, Bette Caan, James R Marshall, Peter Lance, Electra D Paskett, Joel Weissfeld, Martha L Slattery, Randall Burt, Frank Iber, Moshe Shike, J Walter Kikendall, Elaine Lanza, Arthur Schatzkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of confidence in postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines may be a factor in the observed low adherence rates among providers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the 2006 postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, which recommend 3-year follow-up colonoscopy for individuals with high-risk adenomas (defined as > or =3 adenomas or any advanced adenomas) and 5- to 10-year follow-up for patients with 2 or fewer nonadvanced adenomas, who are considered to be at low risk.
DESIGN: Analysis of prospective data from the Polyp Prevention Trial.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 1905 patients who had colorectal adenomas removed at baseline screening or diagnostic colonoscopy and completed the trial. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline adenoma characteristics, risk-stratified according to definitions used in the guidelines, were examined as predictors for advanced adenoma recurrence.
RESULTS: 125 patients (6.6%) had advanced and 629 (33.0%) had nonadvanced adenoma recurrence; 1151 (60.4%) had no recurrence within 4 years of follow-up. The probability of advanced adenoma recurrence was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.11) among patients with high-risk adenomas at baseline and 0.05 (CI, 0.04 to 0.06) among those with low-risk adenomas at baseline. The relative risk for advanced adenoma recurrence for patients with high-risk adenomas versus those with low-risk adenomas at baseline was 1.68 (CI, 1.19 to 2.38) when advanced adenoma recurrence was compared with no advanced adenoma recurrence and 1.76 (CI, 1.26 to 2.46) when advanced adenoma recurrence was compared with no adenoma recurrence. The c-statistics for these 2 comparisons were 0.68 and 0.72, respectively. LIMITATION: Participants were self-selected and had restrictions on the degree of obesity.
CONCLUSION: Although the risk for recurrence of advanced adenoma within 4 years is greater for patients with high-risk adenomas at baseline than for those with low-risk adenomas, the discrimination of this risk stratification scheme is relatively low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18347350     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  36 in total

1.  Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinglong Huang; Wei Gong; Bingzhong Su; Fachao Zhi; Side Liu; Yang Bai; Bo Jiang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Hye Won Park; Min-Ju Kim; Jong-Soo Lee; Ho-Su Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Sung Wook Hwang; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Advances in the management of colorectal cancer: from biology to treatment.

Authors:  Shahid Ahmed; Kate Johnson; Osama Ahmed; Nayyer Iqbal
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Multiple Diminutive Adenomas.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Kim; Tae Jun Kim; Sun-Young Baek; Soohyun Ahn; Eun Ran Kim; Sung Noh Hong; Dong Kyung Chang; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

6.  Colorectal cancer risk: black, white, or shades of gray?

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Laura K Bianchi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Thinking Big About Small Adenomas: Moving Toward "Precision Surveillance".

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Molecular markers of carcinogenesis for risk stratification of individuals with colorectal polyps: a case-control study.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Han Sun; Sang Yi; Joy Storm; Guanghua Xiao; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Song Zhang; Raheela Ashfaq; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-08-04

10.  Early detection of and screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Robert S Bresalier
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.