Literature DB >> 26973404

PillCam® SB3 capsule: Does the increased frame rate eliminate the risk of missing lesions?

Sara Monteiro1, Francisca Dias de Castro1, Pedro Boal Carvalho1, Maria João Moreira1, Bruno Rosa1, José Cotter1.   

Abstract

Since its emergence in 2000, small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has assumed a pivotal role as an investigation method for small bowel diseases. The PillCam(®) SB2-ex offers 12 h of battery time, 4 more than the previous version (SB2). Rahman et al recently found that the PillCam(®) SB2-ex has a significantly increased completion rate, although without higher diagnostic yield, compared with the SB2. We would like to discuss these somewhat surprising results and the new potentialities of the PillCam(®) SB3 regarding the diagnostic yield of small bowel studies. PillCam(®) SB3 offers improved image resolution and faster adaptable frame rate over previous versions of SBCE. We recently compared the major duodenal papilla detection rate obtained with PillCam(®) SB3 and SB2 as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic yield in the proximal small bowel. The PillCam(®) SB3 had a significantly higher major duodenal papilla detection rate than the PillCam(®) SB2 (42.7% vs 24%, P = 0.015). Thus, the most recent version of the PillCam(®) capsule, SB3, may increase diagnostic yield, particularly in the proximal segments of the small bowel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capsule endoscopy; Diagnostic yield; Frames; Lesions; PillCam® SB2; PillCam® SB3

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26973404      PMCID: PMC4779931          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  6 in total

1.  Is half-knowledge worse than ignorance?

Authors:  Oliver W Cass
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Emanuele Rondonotti; Alexandros Karargyris
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Video capsule endoscopy compared with standard endoscopy for the evaluation of small-bowel polyps in persons with familial adenomatous polyposis (with video).

Authors:  Robert F Wong; Ashok K Tuteja; Derrick S Haslem; Lisa Pappas; Aniko Szabo; Maydeen M Ogara; James A DiSario
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Clinically significant small-bowel pathology identified by double-balloon enteroscopy but missed by capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  André K H Chong; Bernard W K Chin; Christopher G Meredith
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology.

Authors:  Merajur Rahman; Stuart Akerman; Bethany DeVito; Larry Miller; Meredith Akerman; Keith Sultan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Aymer Postgate; Edward Despott; David Burling; Arun Gupta; Robin Phillips; James O'Beirne; David Patch; Chris Fraser
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.427

  6 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Bleeding Lesion of the Small Bowel: an Extensive Update Leaving No Stone Unturned.

Authors:  Cedric Van de Bruaene; Pieter Hindryckx; Laurens Van de Bruaene; Danny De Looze
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-07

2.  Poor Quality of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Images Has a Significant Negative Effect in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Malignancy.

Authors:  Diana E Yung; John N Plevris; Romain Leenhardt; Xavier Dray; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-21

3.  Third-Generation Capsule Endoscopy Outperforms Second-Generation Based on the Detectability of Esophageal Varices.

Authors:  Sayoko Kunihara; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Ichiro Otani; Atsushi Igawa; Yuko Nagaoki; Hiroshi Aikata; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 4.  Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.

Authors:  John J McGoran; Mark E McAlindon; Prasad G Iyer; Eric J Seibel; Rehan Haidry; Laurence B Lovat; Sarmed S Sami
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The Role of Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Oladipo Odeyinka; Rasha Alhashimi; Sankeerth Thoota; Tejaswini Ashok; Vishnu Palyam; Ahmad T Azam; Ibrahim Sange
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-25

6.  Does the PillCam SB3 capsule endoscopy system improve image reading efficiency irrespective of experience? A pilot study.

Authors:  Teppei Omori; Toshifumi Hara; Sachiyo Sakasai; Harutaka Kambayashi; Shun Murasugi; Ayumi Ito; Shinichi Nakamura; Katsutoshi Tokushige
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Diagnostic Benefit of Simultaneous Capsule Endoscopy Using Two Different Systems.

Authors:  Seung Han Kim; Hyuk Soon Choi; Hoon Jai Chun; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 8.  Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: Role in diagnosis, management, and treatment.

Authors:  Clayton M Spiceland; Nilesh Lodhia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The Usefulness of New-Generation Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Portal Hypertensive Enteropathy.

Authors:  Seung-Joo Nam; Ji Hyun Kim; Sung Chul Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 10.  Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: When? To Whom?

Authors:  Soo-Young Na; Yun-Jeong Lim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.