Literature DB >> 23840112

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.

Anastasios Koulaouzidis1, Emanuele Rondonotti, Alexandros Karargyris.   

Abstract

The introduction of capsule endoscopy (CE) in clinical practice increased the interest for the study of the small-bowel. Consequently, in about 10 years, an impressive quantity of literature on indications, diagnostic yield (DY), safety profile and technical evolution of CE has been published as well as several reviews. At present time, there are 5 small-bowel capsule enteroscopy (SBCE) models in the worldwide market. Head-to-head trials have showed in the great majority of studies comparable results in terms of DY, image quality and completion rate. CE meta-analyses formed the basis of national/international guidelines; these guidelines place CE in a prime position for the diagnostic work-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, known and/or suspected Crohn's disease and possible small-bowel neoplasia. A 2-L polyethylene glycol-based purge, administered the day before the procedure, is the most widely practiced preparation regimen. Whether this regimen can be further improved (i.e., by further decreasing its volume, changing the timing of administration, coupling it with prokinetics and/or other factors) or if it can really affect the DY, is still under discussion. Faecal calprotectin has been used in SBCE studies in two settings: in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to evaluate the type and extent of mucosal damage and, more importantly from a clinical point of view, in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease for assessment of inflammation activity. Although there is still a lot of debate around the exact reasons of SBCE poor performance in various small-bowel segments, it is worth to remember that the capsule progress is non-steerable, hence more rapid in the proximal than in lower segments of the small-bowel. Capsule aspiration, a relatively unexpected complication, has been reported with increasing frequency. This is probably related with the increase in the mean age of patients undergoing CE. CE video review is a time-consuming procedure. Therefore, several attempts have been made to develop technical software features, in order to make CE video analysis easier and shorter (without jeopardizing its accuracy). Suspected Blood Indicator, QuickView and Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy are some of the software tools that have been checked in various clinical studies to date.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calprotectin; Capsule endoscopy; Complication; Indications; Meta-analysis; Preparation; Reading software; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23840112      PMCID: PMC3699039          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  122 in total

1.  Design and fabrication of a magnetic propulsion system for self-propelled capsule endoscope.

Authors:  Mingyuan Gao; Chengzhi Hu; Zhenzhi Chen; Honghai Zhang; Sheng Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Identification of the duodenal papilla by colon capsule endoscope.

Authors:  S Karagiannis; C Dücker; P Dautel; J Strubenhoff; S Faiss
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Diagnostic characteristics of given video capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of celiac disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary; Hien Huynh; Ben Vandermeer
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kyriakos; Stefanos Karagiannis; Petros Galanis; Christos Liatsos; Irini Zouboulis-Vafiadis; Evangelos Georgiou; Christos Mavrogiannis
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  The role of video capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Theodore Rokkas; Yaron Niv
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  A randomized head-to-head study of small-bowel imaging comparing MiroCam and EndoCapsule.

Authors:  W Dolak; S Kulnigg-Dabsch; R Evstatiev; C Gasche; M Trauner; A Püspök
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Fecal calprotectin and S100A12 have low utility in prediction of small bowel Crohn's disease detected by wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Taina Sipponen; Johanna Haapamäki; Erkki Savilahti; Henrik Alfthan; Esa Hämäläinen; Henna Rautiainen; Jari Koskenpato; Hannu Nuutinen; Martti Färkkilä
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Does purgative preparation influence the diagnostic yield of small bowel video capsule endoscopy?: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Rokkas; K Papaxoinis; K Triantafyllou; D Pistiolas; S D Ladas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention.

Authors:  J H Cheon; Y-S Kim; I-S Lee; D K Chang; J-K Ryu; K J Lee; J-S Moon; C H Park; J-O Kim; K-N Shim; C H Choi; D Y Cheung; B I Jang; G-S Seo; H-J Chun; M-G Choi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Miguel Muñoz-Navas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Capsule endoscopy: The road ahead.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Singeap; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Wireless endoscopy in 2020: Will it still be a capsule?

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Dimitris K Iakovidis; Alexandros Karargyris; Emanuele Rondonotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Portal hypertensive enteropathy, occult bleeding, and capsule endoscopy: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Konstantinos J Dabos; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Endoscopic techniques to detect small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors: A literature review.

Authors:  Roberta Elisa Rossi; Dario Conte; Luca Elli; Federica Branchi; Sara Massironi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Capsule-odometer: a concept to improve accurate lesion localisation.

Authors:  Alexandros Karargyris; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Evaluation of 4 three-dimensional representation algorithms in capsule endoscopy images.

Authors:  Alexandros Karargyris; Emanuele Rondonotti; Giovanna Mandelli; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Long-term effects of video capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Georgios Tziatzios; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

8.  Clinical Review of Small-Bowel Endoscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Bartel; Mark E Stark; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Giulia Roda; Siew Chien Ng; Paulo Gustavo Kotze; Marjorie Argollo; Remo Panaccione; Antonino Spinelli; Arthur Kaser; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Silvio Danese
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Comparison of Lewis Score and Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Teppei Omori; Harutaka Kambayashi; Shun Murasugi; Ayumi Ito; Maria Yonezawa; Shinichi Nakamura; Katsutoshi Tokushige
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.