| Literature DB >> 26973157 |
Jakob D Jensen1, Manusheela Pokharel1, Courtney L Scherr2, Andy J King3, Natasha Brown4, Christina Jones5.
Abstract
Public dissemination of scientific research often focuses on the finding (e.g., nanobombs kill lung cancer) rather than the uncertainty/limitations (e.g., in mice). Adults (n = 880) participated in an experiment where they read a manipulated news report about cancer research (a) that contained either low or high uncertainty (b) that was attributed to the scientists responsible for the research (disclosure condition) or an unaffiliated scientist (dueling condition). Compared to the dueling condition, the disclosure condition triggered less prevention-focused cancer fatalism and nutritional backlash.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; cancer information overload; fatalism; nutritional backlash; uncertainty
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26973157 PMCID: PMC5018910 DOI: 10.1111/risa.12600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Risk Anal ISSN: 0272-4332 Impact factor: 4.000