Literature DB >> 26973157

Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.

Jakob D Jensen1, Manusheela Pokharel1, Courtney L Scherr2, Andy J King3, Natasha Brown4, Christina Jones5.   

Abstract

Public dissemination of scientific research often focuses on the finding (e.g., nanobombs kill lung cancer) rather than the uncertainty/limitations (e.g., in mice). Adults (n = 880) participated in an experiment where they read a manipulated news report about cancer research (a) that contained either low or high uncertainty (b) that was attributed to the scientists responsible for the research (disclosure condition) or an unaffiliated scientist (dueling condition). Compared to the dueling condition, the disclosure condition triggered less prevention-focused cancer fatalism and nutritional backlash.
© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; cancer information overload; fatalism; nutritional backlash; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26973157      PMCID: PMC5018910          DOI: 10.1111/risa.12600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  33 in total

1.  News headlines feed on fear of cancer risk, experts say.

Authors:  T Reynolds
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Living can be hazardous to your health: how the news media cover cancer risks.

Authors:  C Russell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

3.  Lost in Translation? A Comparison of Cancer-Genetics Reporting in the Press Release and its Subsequent Coverage in Lay Press.

Authors:  Jean M Brechman; Chul-Joo Lee; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Sci Commun       Date:  2009-06

4.  Does Local Television News Coverage Cultivate Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention?

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Erika Franklin Fowler; Kenneth Goldstein; James Pribble
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Thomas C Lehman; Holly Massett; Simon C Lee; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Cancer fatalism: the state of the science.

Authors:  Barbara D Powe; Ramona Finnie
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  News coverage of cancer in the United States: a national sample of newspapers, television, and magazines.

Authors:  Michael D Slater; Marilee Long; Erwin P Bettinghaus; Jason B Reineke
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-09

Review 8.  Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence.

Authors:  Paul K J Han
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Cancer Internet search activity on a major search engine, United States 2001-2003.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Kenneth P Mallon; Steven Leadbetter; Lori A Pollack; Lucy A Peipins
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Against conventional wisdom: when the public, the media, and medical practice collide.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Melinda Krakow; Kevin K John; Miao Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of the public nutrition information environment: Adapting the cancer information overload scale to measure diet information overload.

Authors:  Steven Ramondt; A Susana Ramírez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-26

2.  Examining Rural-Urban Differences in Fatalism and Information Overload: Data from 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jackilen Shannon; Ronaldo Iachan; Yangyang Deng; Sunny Jung Kim; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Babalola Faseru; Electra D Paskett; Jinxiang Hu; Robin C Vanderpool; DeAnn Lazovich; Jason A Mendoza; Sanjay Shete; Linda B Robertson; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Katherine J Briant; Benjamin Haaland; David A Haggstrom; Bernard F Fuemmeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.090

3.  Revisiting nutrition backlash: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the nutrition backlash scale.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Elizabeth A Giorgi; Jennifer R Jackson; Julia Berger; Rachael A Katz; Amy R Mobley
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis.

Authors:  Saira Hanif Soroya; Ali Farooq; Khalid Mahmood; Jouni Isoaho; Shan-E Zara
Journal:  Inf Process Manag       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19.

Authors:  Nicolle Simonovic; Jennifer M Taber
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  Communication of Uncertainty about Preliminary Evidence and the Spread of Its Inferred Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Weibo Case Study.

Authors:  Jiahui Lu; Meishan Zhang; Yan Zheng; Qiyu Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Public engagement and argumentation in science.

Authors:  Silvia Ivani; Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Journal:  Eur J Philos Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.602

8.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.