Literature DB >> 10854473

Living can be hazardous to your health: how the news media cover cancer risks.

C Russell.   

Abstract

For more than two decades, the news media has bombarded the public with often conflicting information about health risks, contributing to an atmosphere of hype and hysteria about cancer and other diseases. Improvements in media reporting of health risks require greater efforts by both those who cover the news and those who create it. Guidelines for bringing more perspective and balance to media coverage of risk are provided. These include putting cancer in context with other diseases, explaining absolute and relative risks, differentiating between individual and population risks, stressing the degree of uncertainty of new research and how it fits with previous data, covering the process as well as end results of science, understanding different media constraints and needs, and taking into account the diverse backgrounds and needs of the target audience-the general public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854473     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  11 in total

Review 1.  Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Q Lisa Bu; Porismita Borah; David A Kindig; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Distorting Genetic Research about Cancer: From Bench Science to Press Release to Published News.

Authors:  Jean M Brechman; Chul-Joo Lee; Joseph Cappella
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2011-06

3.  Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influence.

Authors:  Steven Ramondt; A Susana Ramírez
Journal:  Ann Int Commun Assoc       Date:  2017-10-19

4.  Does Local Television News Coverage Cultivate Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention?

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Erika Franklin Fowler; Kenneth Goldstein; James Pribble
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Manusheela Pokharel; Courtney L Scherr; Andy J King; Natasha Brown; Christina Jones
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  The Internet and science communication: blurring the boundaries.

Authors:  R Warden
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2010-12-14

7.  Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Nick Carcioppolo; Andy J King; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara Davis; Robert Yale; Jessica Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05

8.  Policy lessons from comparing mortality from two global forces: international terrorism and tobacco.

Authors:  George Thomson; Nick Wilson
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 9.  The construct of breast cancer risk perception: need for a better risk communication?

Authors:  E T M de Jonge; J Vlasselaer; G Van de Putte; J-C Schobbens
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

10.  The media and cancer: education or entertainment? An ethnographic study of European cancer journalists.

Authors:  Ajay Aggarwal; Rekha Batura; Richard Sullivan
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.