Mouse testes contain several isoforms of cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPCs), including ubiquitous PABPC1 and testis-specific PABPC2/PABPt. PABPC2 is characterized by its absence from translationally active polyribosomes and elongating spermatids. To elucidate the function of PABPC2 in spermatogenesis, we produced mutant mice lacking PABPC2. The PABPC2-null mice showed normal fertility. The processes of spermatogenesis and sperm migration in the testes and epididymides, respectively, were normal in the mutant mice. When the involvement of PABPC2 in translational regulation of haploid-specific mRNAs was examined, these mRNAs were correctly transcribed in round spermatids and translated in elongating spermatids. Moreover, immunoblot analysis revealed low abundance of PABPC2 relative to PABPC1 in spermatogenic cells. These results suggest that PABPC2 may be either functionally redundant with other PABPCs (including PABPC1) or largely dispensable for translational regulation during spermiogenesis.
Mouse testes contain several isoforms of cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPCs), including ubiquitous PABPC1 and testis-specific PABPC2/PABPt. PABPC2 is characterized by its absence from translationally active polyribosomes and elongating spermatids. To elucidate the function of PABPC2 in spermatogenesis, we produced mutant mice lacking PABPC2. The PABPC2-null mice showed normal fertility. The processes of spermatogenesis and sperm migration in the testes and epididymides, respectively, were normal in the mutant mice. When the involvement of PABPC2 in translational regulation of haploid-specific mRNAs was examined, these mRNAs were correctly transcribed in round spermatids and translated in elongating spermatids. Moreover, immunoblot analysis revealed low abundance of PABPC2 relative to PABPC1 in spermatogenic cells. These results suggest that PABPC2 may be either functionally redundant with other PABPCs (including PABPC1) or largely dispensable for translational regulation during spermiogenesis.
Spermatogenesis is a highly specialized process of cellular differentiation for the production of spermatozoa, in
which diploid spermatogonia proliferate and divide meiotically to generate haploid round spermatids that are in
turn transformed into spermatozoa. The precise regulation of spermatogenesis requires a controlled program of
stage-specific gene expression regulated at the transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and translational levels
[1,2,3,4,5,6]. Drastic morphological changes, such as the formation of a flagellum and a highly compacted
nucleus, are accomplished during spermiogenesis: the haploid phase of spermatogenesis. Transcription of the
haploid genome ceases midway through spermiogenesis, concomitantly with the onset of chromatin condensation [7]. Accordingly, mRNAs encoding structural proteins required for cellular
remodeling are transcribed in early haploid spermatids and stored as translationally inert messenger
ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). Subsequent translational activation of the repressed messages in late
spermatids accompanies poly(A) shortening [8, 9]. On the other hand, poly(A) tails of some mRNAs are known to be longer in early haploid spermatids
than in meiotic spermatocytes [10,11,12,13,14]. Thus, the mRNA metabolism plays a critical role in spermiogenesis.Poly(A) tails of eukaryotic mRNAs are post-transcriptionally added to the 3′ end of mRNAs in the nucleus. After
the transport of mRNA to the cytoplasm, the cytoplasmic forms of poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPCs) associate with
the poly(A) tails. In mice, five PABPCs— PABPC1, PABPC2/PABPt, PABPC4/iPABPC, PABPC1L/ePABPC, and PABPC5— have
been identified to date [15]. Pabpc1 is ubiquitously
expressed in mammalian cells, whereas expression of intronless Pabpc2 is exclusive to
spermatogenic cells [16, 17]. PABPC4
and PABPC1L are essential for erythroid differentiation and oocyte maturation, respectively [18, 19]. Moreover, X-linked PABPC5 lacks the C-terminal
domain present in the other PABPC members. Among these five PABPCs, PABPC1 has been extensively studied in
relation to various parameters of mRNA metabolism, including mRNA stabilization, cytoplasmic polyadenylation and
deadenylation, translation initiation and termination, and microRNA-associated regulation [15, 20,21,22]. In spermatogenesis, PABPC1 is implicated in the ablation of
PABPC1-interacting proteins, including DAZL, BOULE, and PABPC-interacting protein 2A (PAIP2A), which results in
spermatogenic defects at different stages [5, 6].MurinePabpc2 is a retroposed paralogue gene that originates from Pabpc1 [16, 23]. Previously, we found that
PABPC1 and PABPC2 are complexed with each other and associate nonspecifically with mRNAs during spermatogenesis
[17]. Both PABPC proteins also interact with several
translation-associated factors, including eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), and are capable of
enhancing translation of a reporter mRNA in vitro. Despite these functional similarities, PABPC2
differs from PABPC1 in the distribution among spermatogenic cells and polyribosomes and in the expression pattern
during spermatogenesis [17]. In the present study, to uncover the function
of PABPC2, we produced mutant mice lacking PABPC2 and analyzed the effects of the PABPC2 knockout on mRNA
metabolic pathways.
Materials and Methods
Generation of PABPC2-null mice
A targeting vector containing a 1.1-kbp expression cassette of the neomycin resistance gene
neo (pMC1neopA; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), which was flanked by approximately 8.0- and
1.6-kbp genomic regions of Pabpc2 at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively, was constructed as
described previously [14]. The herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase
gene (HSV-tk) was inserted into the 1.6-kbp Pabpc2 genomic region at the 3′
end (Fig. 1A). After electroporation of the targeting vector (which had been linearized by digestion with
NotI) into mouse D3 embryonic stem (ES) cells, homologous recombinants were selected using
G418 and ganciclovir, as described previously [14]. Five ES cell clones
carrying the targeted mutation were isolated from approximately 300 doubly-resistant colonies, and three
clones were injected into blastocysts of C57BL/6 mice (Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan). The chimeric male mice
that were born were crossed with C57BL/6 females to create heterozygous
(Pabpc2+/–) mutant mice. Homozygous (Pabpc2–/–) mice
were obtained by mating the heterozygous males and females.
Fig. 1.
Targeted disruption of mouse Pabpc2. (A) Physical maps of Pabpc2,
targeting construct, and predicted targeted allele. The locations of the protein-coding region in
Pabpc2 and of neo are boxed with black and gray colors,
respectively. The open box represents HSV-tk. The restriction enzyme sites are
indicated as follows: B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; H, HindIII;
N, NotI; P, PstI; S, SphI; V, EcoRV;
and X, XhoI. (B) Detection of the targeted allele. Genomic DNAs of original D3 ES cells
(D3) and two targeted ES cell clones (#24 and #31) were double-digested with BamHI and
HindIII and subjected to Southern blot analysis (upper panel) using a
32P-labeled DNA fragment (Probe S in panel A). Tail DNAs of the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice were analyzed by PCR (lower panel) using primer sets G16/G17 and
Neo/G17 (see panel A). (C) RT-PCR analysis. The protein-coding region of Pabpc2 mRNA
was analyzed by RT-PCR in testicular total RNA, with Actb mRNA as a control. (D)
Immunoblot analysis. Protein extracts of testicular tissues were analyzed by immunoblotting with a
PABPC1- or PABPC2-specific antibody. ACTB served as a control.
Targeted disruption of mousePabpc2. (A) Physical maps of Pabpc2,
targeting construct, and predicted targeted allele. The locations of the protein-coding region in
Pabpc2 and of neo are boxed with black and gray colors,
respectively. The open box represents HSV-tk. The restriction enzyme sites are
indicated as follows: B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; H, HindIII;
N, NotI; P, PstI; S, SphI; V, EcoRV;
and X, XhoI. (B) Detection of the targeted allele. Genomic DNAs of original D3 ES cells
(D3) and two targeted ES cell clones (#24 and #31) were double-digested with BamHI and
HindIII and subjected to Southern blot analysis (upper panel) using a
32P-labeled DNA fragment (Probe S in panel A). Tail DNAs of the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice were analyzed by PCR (lower panel) using primer sets G16/G17 and
Neo/G17 (see panel A). (C) RT-PCR analysis. The protein-coding region of Pabpc2 mRNA
was analyzed by RT-PCR in testicular total RNA, with Actb mRNA as a control. (D)
Immunoblot analysis. Protein extracts of testicular tissues were analyzed by immunoblotting with a
PABPC1- or PABPC2-specific antibody. ACTB served as a control.
PCR genotyping
Genomic DNAs of ES cell clones and mouse tails were amplified by PCR using three primers:
5′-ATGGATGACGAGACCCTGAATG-3′ (G16, see Fig. 1A),
5′-GCGCTGCGAATCGGGAGCGGCGATACCGT-3′ (Neo), and 5′-GGTCTCTGGTCAGTTTAAACAGTTGGG-3′ (G17). The PCR program
consisted of 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 64°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. Approximately 1.3- and 2.1-kbp
DNA fragments were produced by the primer sets G16/G17 and Neo/G17, respectively.
Southern blot analysis
Genomic DNA samples (10 μg) were digested with BamHI and HindIII, subjected
to electrophoresis in agarose gels, and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membranes (GE Healthcare,
Piscataway, NJ, USA). The blots were hybridized with a 32P-labeled
HincII-SphI DNA fragment (Fig.
1A), as described previously [14].
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA samples (5 μg) of mouse testicular tissues were prepared using the ISOGEN Kit (Nippon Gene, Toyama,
Japan). The RNA samples were denatured with glyoxal, separated on agarose gels, and transferred onto
Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (GE Healthcare) [13]. The blots
were probed with 32P-labeled DNA fragments.
Total RNAs (1 μg) were digested with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and reverse-transcribed
in the presence of an oligo(dT)20 primer using a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A portion of the synthesized cDNA was amplified by PCR using the
following sets of primers: Pabpc2, 5′-GGAATTCGCCACCATGGCCTCGCTCTATG-3′ and
5′-CCTGCCAAAGAGGCCATTCA-3′; Actb, 5′-GGTGACAGCATTGCTTCTGTG-3′ and
5′-GGAATTCAAGTCAGTGTACAGGCCAG-3′. The PCR program consisted of 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 sec, 55°C for 15 sec,
and 68°C for 1 min.
Antibodies
Affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the 13- and 12-residue peptides specific for mousePABPC1 and PABPC2, respectively, were prepared as described previously [17]. A polyclonal antibody capable of recognizing both mousePABPC1 and PABPC2 (hereafter called the
anti-PABPC1/2 antibody) was also prepared using a 6 × His- and thioredoxin (TRX)-tagged fragment of the PABPC1
protein (amino acid residues 53–363) as an antigen. The 311-residue sequence is 88% identical between PABPC1
and PABPC2 [16]. Briefly, the recombinant PABPC1 was expressed in
Escherichia coli and purified on a Ni-NTAHis column (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
The purified protein (400 μg) was emulsified with Freund’s complete (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ,
USA) or incomplete adjuvant (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and injected into female New Zealand White rabbits (Japan
SLC) [17]. The antisera were fractionated with ammonium sulfate (0–40%
saturation) followed by immunoaffinity chromatography on a Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare) column conjugated with
the 311-residue fragment of PABPC1 protein fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST), as
described previously [24]. A mouse monoclonal antibody against murineA-kinase anchor protein 4 (AKAP4/AKAP82/PRKA4; sc-135827) and goat polyclonal antibodies against humanphosphoglycerate kinase 2 (PGK2; sc-133905), humanprotamine 2 (PRM2; sc-23104), and mouse transition protein
2 (TNP2; sc-21106) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Mouse monoclonal
anti-β-actin (ACTB; A5441) and rabbit polyclonal anti-His tag antibodies (PM032) were obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Medical & Biological Laboratories (Nagoya, Japan),
respectively.
Immunoblot analysis
Testicular tissues were homogenized at 4°C in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet
P-40, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml pepstatin A, and 0.5 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, using a Teflon-glass
homogenizer (750 rpm, 10 strokes). After incubation at 4°C for 4 h, the homogenates were centrifuged in a
microcentrifuge at 13,400 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant solution was used as protein
extracts. Protein concentration was determined by means of the Coomassie Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Thermo
Fisher Scientific). Protein samples (5 μg) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore). After blocking with 2% skim milk or
gelatin, the blots were probed with primary antibodies followed by incubation with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). The
immunoreactive proteins were visualized by an ECL or an ECL Prime Western Blot Detection Kit (GE
Healthcare).
Histological analysis
Testicular and epididymal tissues were fixed with Bouin’s fixative and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin
sections (4-μm thick) were prepared in a MICROM HM340E (Microedge Instruments, White Rock, BC, Canada),
mounted on slides, deparaffinized in xylene, and hydrated in a graded ethanol series. After staining with
hematoxylin and eosin (Wako), the slides were examined under a DM IRBE microscope (Leica Microsystems,
Wetzlar, Germany).
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3), unless stated otherwise. The Student t-test
was used for statistical analysis; significance was assumed at P < 0.05.
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved and performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals at the University of Tsukuba (approval numbers 14-022 and 15-015).
Results
To elucidate the function of PABPC2 in spermatogenesis, we produced mice carrying a null mutation of
Pabpc2 using homologous recombination in ES cells (Fig.
1A). A targeting vector was designed to delete PABPC2 by replacing the 871-nucleotide protein-coding
region containing the RNA-recognition motifs 1 through 4 with the neo cassette. When genomic
DNAs of selected ES cell clones were subjected to Southern blot analysis, a correctly targeted allele yielded an
expected band corresponding to a 5.4-kbp BamHI-HindIII DNA fragment, in
addition to a 7.2-kbp HindIII-HindIII fragment derived from the wild-type
allele (Fig. 1B, upper panel). The genotypes of
Pabpc2+/+, Pabpc2+/–, and
Pabpc2–/– mice were also verified by PCR using tail genomic DNA as a template
(Fig. 1B, lower panel). Moreover, RT-PCR analysis indicated the loss
of functional Pabpc2 mRNA in Pabpc2–/– testes (Fig. 1C). Indeed, testicular extracts of Pabpc2–/– mice
lacked 69-kDa PABPC2, whereas 70-kDa PABPC1 was normally present (Fig.
1D). These results prove the successful gene knockout of Pabpc2.Intercross between the Pabpc2+/– male and female mice yielded an expected Mendelian
frequency in the offspring [Pabpc2+/+: Pabpc2+/–:
Pabpc2–/– = 23 (27%): 41 (49%): 20 (24%) for 84 pups from 10 litters]. Both
Pabpc2–/– males and females apparently demonstrated normal behavior, body weight,
and health. When the male fertility was tested by mating two of each Pabpc2+/+ and
Pabpc2–/– males with wild-type females, no significant differences were observed
between the Pabpc2+/+ and Pabpc2–/– males (Fig. 2A). The testicular weights of Pabpc2+/+ and
Pabpc2–/– mice were also similar (Fig.
2B). Histological analysis indicated that spermatogenesis and sperm migration in the testes and
epididymides, respectively, of Pabpc2–/– mice proceeded normally (Fig. 2C). Moreover, Pabpc2–/– epididymal sperm
were morphologically indistinguishable from Pabpc2+/+ sperm (Fig. 2D). These results suggest that spermatogenesis and fertility are not affected by
the loss of PABPC2. It should be noted that the Pabpc2–/– females also showed normal
fertility and produced litters of normal size (8.7 ± 0.5 offspring for seven litters).
Fig. 2.
Characterization of the male PABPC2 knockout mice. (A) Fertility of male mice. Ten-week-old wild-type
(WT) and PABPC2 knockout (KO) males were mated with 8-week-old C57BL/6 females. Two different KO males
were fertile, and the pups born were counted (seven litters). (B) Testicular weight. Testicular tissues of
13-week-old WT and KO mice were weighted (n = 6). (C) Histological analysis. Testicular and epididymal
slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a microscope. The scale bar is 50 μm.
(D) Sperm morphology. Epididymal sperm of WT and KO mice were double-stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and
MitoTracker Green FM (green) and then examined. The scale bar is 10 μm.
Characterization of the male PABPC2 knockout mice. (A) Fertility of male mice. Ten-week-old wild-type
(WT) and PABPC2 knockout (KO) males were mated with 8-week-old C57BL/6 females. Two different KO males
were fertile, and the pups born were counted (seven litters). (B) Testicular weight. Testicular tissues of
13-week-old WT and KO mice were weighted (n = 6). (C) Histological analysis. Testicular and epididymal
slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a microscope. The scale bar is 50 μm.
(D) Sperm morphology. Epididymal sperm of WT and KO mice were double-stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and
MitoTracker Green FM (green) and then examined. The scale bar is 10 μm.We next examined the effect of the PABPC2 knockout on mRNA metabolism in spermatogenic cells. Northern blot
analysis indicated that the levels of five haploid-specific mRNAs, including Prm1,
Prm2, and Tnp2 mRNAs, were similar among
Pabpc2+/+, Pabpc2+/–, and
Pabpc2–/– mice (Fig. 3A). Notably, the abundance of poly(A)-shortened forms of Prm1, Prm2, and
Tnp2 mRNAs of the sizes 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 kb, respectively, in the
Pabpc2–/– testes was comparable with that in the
Pabpc2+/+ and Pabpc2+/– testes. Consistent with the
previous findings that poly(A) shortening accompanies translational activation of these three mRNAs [8, 9], the PRM2 and TNP2 levels were
unaffected by the loss of PABPC2 (Fig. 3B). The levels of PGK2 and
AKAP4 were also similar among the Pabpc2+/+, Pabpc2+/–,
and Pabpc2–/– testes.
Fig. 3.
Expression and translation of haploid-specific mRNAs in Pabpc2–/– mice. (A)
Northern blot analysis. Testicular total RNAs of the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice were analyzed by Northern blot
hybridization with the cDNA probes indicated. Actb served as a control. (B and C)
Immunoblot analysis. Testicular protein extracts of 11-week-old mice (B) or 26-day-old (26 d) and
11-week-old mice (C) were analyzed by immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated. ACTB was used as a
control. (D) Normal translational control of haploid-specific mRNAs in
Pabpc2–/– mice. Testicular total RNAs of 26-day-old and 11-week-old mice
were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization. Actb served as a control.
Expression and translation of haploid-specific mRNAs in Pabpc2–/– mice. (A)
Northern blot analysis. Testicular total RNAs of the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice were analyzed by Northern blot
hybridization with the cDNA probes indicated. Actb served as a control. (B and C)
Immunoblot analysis. Testicular protein extracts of 11-week-old mice (B) or 26-day-old (26 d) and
11-week-old mice (C) were analyzed by immunoblotting with the antibodies indicated. ACTB was used as a
control. (D) Normal translational control of haploid-specific mRNAs in
Pabpc2–/– mice. Testicular total RNAs of 26-day-old and 11-week-old mice
were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization. Actb served as a control.To test whether the loss of PABPC2 elicits precocious translation of Prm2,
Tnp2, Pgk2, and Akap4 mRNAs in round spermatids, we
conducted an immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3C). We examined the testicular
protein extracts of mice 26 days and 11 weeks after birth because the 26-day-old testes contain no elongating
spermatids [6]. Four proteins —PRM2, TNP2, PGK2, and AKAP4— present only
in elongating spermatids were absent in the 26-day-old testes of Pabpc2+/– and
Pabpc2–/– mice (Fig. 3C). In addition,
the 11-week-old Pabpc2+/– and Pabpc2–/– testes contained
equal amounts of these four proteins. As expected, the 0.4-kb Prm1, 0.6-kb
Prm2, and 0.6-kb Tnp2 mRNAs were absent in the 26-day-old
Pabpc2+/– and Pabpc2–/– testes but present in the
11-week-old testes (Fig. 3D). Thus, PABPC2 may have no effect on the
regulated translation of haploid-specific mRNAs during spermiogenesis.As described above, murine spermatogenic cells contain at least two isoforms of PABPCs, 70-kDa PABPC1 and
69-kDa PABPC2, that share a relatively high degree of sequence identity (approximately 80%) [16]. Although PABPC1 is distinguished from PABPC2 by the expression pattern
during spermatogenesis [17], the levels of expression of these two
proteins in spermatogenic cells are still unknown. Accordingly, we prepared the affinity-purified anti-PABPC1/2
antibody capable of recognizing both PABPC1 and PABPC2, using a 311-residue fragment of the PABPC1 protein as an
antigen. Specificity of the anti-PABPC1/2 antibody was validated by immunoblot analysis of His-tagged
recombinant PABPC1 and PABPC2 proteins (Fig. 4A). Anti-PABPC1 and anti-PABPC2 antibodies specifically recognized the recombinant PABPC1 and PABPC2,
respectively, as described previously [17]. Predictably, the
anti-PABPC1/2 antibody recognized these two recombinant proteins equivalently. When testicular protein extracts
were analyzed by immunoblotting, the anti-PABPC1/2 antibody yielded an immunoreactive band corresponding to both
PABPC1 and PABPC2 or only PABPC1 in
Pabpc2+/+,Pabpc2+/–, and
Pabpc2–/– mice (Fig. 4B). Densitometric
analysis of the immunoblots (n = 2) indicated that the average ratio of signal intensities was 100: 113: 114 for
the Pabpc2+/+, Pabpc2+/–, and
Pabpc2–/– testes, respectively. Thus, only a small amount of PABPC2 may be present
in spermatogenic cells as compared to PABPC1.
Fig. 4.
Abundance of PABPC2 in spermatogenic cells. Immunoblot analysis of His-tagged recombinant PABPC1 and
PABPC2 proteins (A) or testicular protein extracts from the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice (B) was carried out using the
antibodies indicated. An asterisk indicates that a nonspecific protein reacted with the anti-PABPC2
antibody. ACTB served as a control.
Abundance of PABPC2 in spermatogenic cells. Immunoblot analysis of His-tagged recombinant PABPC1 and
PABPC2 proteins (A) or testicular protein extracts from the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous
(+/–), and homozygous (–/–) mice (B) was carried out using the
antibodies indicated. An asterisk indicates that a nonspecific protein reacted with the anti-PABPC2
antibody. ACTB served as a control.
Discussion
This study describes functional compensation for the loss of mousePABPC2 in spermatogenic cells. We [17] previously found that PABPC2 is completely or largely absent both in
elongating spermatids and in actively translating polyribosomes. These findings raise the possibility that
PABPC2 protects haploid-specific mRNAs, including Prm2 and Tnp2 mRNAs, from
precocious translation in round spermatids. It is also likely that the absence of PABPC2 in elongating
spermatids is implicated in deadenylation of the haploid-specific mRNAs as a prerequisite for translation.
Nonetheless, our present data indicate that the haploid-specific mRNAs are normally transcribed in round
spermatids and translated in elongating spermatids. Thus, PABPC2 may be either functionally redundant with other
PABPCs (including PABPC1) or largely dispensable for translational regulation during spermiogenesis. The low
abundance of PABPC2 relative to PABPC1 in spermatogenic cells appears to support this notion.Proteins of the PABPC family perform important functions in vertebrate cells [18, 19, 25]. Despite the
presence of PABPC1, depletion of mousePABPC4/iPABPC results in a change of the steady-state levels of some
erythroid mRNAs, leading to inhibition of terminal erythroid maturation [19]. Female mice lacking germ line-specific PABPC1L/ePABPC are infertile; the oocytes fail to mature
because protein synthesis is impaired by the abrogated cytoplasmic polyadenylation of maternal mRNAs [18, 26]. The oogenesis-specific
defects in the PABPC1L/ePABPC-null mice may be explained by the absence of PABPC1 until four-cell embryos [27], although male germ cells contain both PABPC1 and PABPC1L/ePABPC [28]. As described above, PABPC1 and PABPC2 are both present in pachytene
spermatocytes and round spermatids [17]. Thus, even if PABPC2 is involved
in the translational mechanism, the loss of PABPC2 in Pabpc2–/– spermatogenic cells
may be compensated by PABPC1, as in PABPC1L/ePABPC-null spermatogenic cells.A puzzling question is why functionally redundant Pabpc2 is expressed in spermatogenic cells.
Intronless genes that are specifically expressed in testes, including Pabpc2, have arisen from
intron-containing progenitor genes by retroposition [23, 29, 30]. It is noteworthy that the
retroposition from the X-linked genes has been suggested to be necessary as a compensation mechanism for
depletion of somatic isoforms caused by meiotic X chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis [31]. Indeed, inactivation of genes encoding polyadenylation factor
CSTF2T/τCstF-64 or centriole protein CETN1 (centrin 1) results in the spermatogenic arrest [32, 33]. In contrast,
Pabpc2 is believed to be retroposed from autosomal Pabpc1 [23]. One possible explanation for the exclusive expression of
Pabpc2 in spermatogenic cells may be transcriptional promiscuity induced by a high
concentration of RNA polymerase II holoenzyme in meiotic and early haploid cells; this state of affairs may
enable transcription from the gene promoters inactive in other cells [23,
34, 35]. A similar scenario may
be applicable to intronless Pabpc3/tPabp exclusively expressed in primate testes [36].
Authors: Emre Seli; Maria D Lalioti; Sean M Flaherty; Denny Sakkas; Nihal Terzi; Joan A Steitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-01-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Saffet Ozturk; Ozlem Guzeloglu-Kayisli; Katie M Lowther; Maria D Lalioti; Denny Sakkas; Emre Seli Journal: Mol Reprod Dev Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 2.609