Literature DB >> 2697170

Current magnitude of occupational disease in the United States. Estimates from New York State.

P J Landrigan1, S Markowitz.   

Abstract

The data from our study indicate that the magnitude of occupational disease in New York State is considerable, and that a detailed and comprehensive plan must be initiated and implemented if occupational disease is to be controlled. New York State contains slightly less than 10% of the nation's workforce. A direct linear extrapolation of findings in New York State cannot be made to derive estimates of the national burden of work-related illness. Nevertheless, a crude estimate of the national magnitude of occupational disease can be derived from the New York experience. Such extrapolation provides a crude estimate of 50,000-70,000 deaths each year from occupational disease and of 350,000 new cases of occupational illness. These numbers are distressingly similar to the annual estimates of 100,000 deaths and 400,000 cases of occupational illness developed almost 15 years ago by Ashford. Clearly substantial progress remains to be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2697170     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb13568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  10 in total

1.  Occupational health of Southeast Asian immigrants in a US city: a comparison of data sources.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Commentary: environmental disease--a preventable epidemic.

Authors:  P J Landrigan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Best estimate of the magnitude of mortality due to occupational exposure to hazardous substances.

Authors:  S Morrell; C Kerr; T Driscoll; R Taylor; G Salkeld; S Corbett
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  The case for stronger OSHA enforcement--evidence from evaluation research.

Authors:  T H McQuiston; R C Zakocs; D Loomis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  The proportion of cancer attributable to occupational exposures.

Authors:  Mark P Purdue; Sally J Hutchings; Lesley Rushton; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Do zero-cost workers' compensation medical claims really have zero costs? The impact of workplace injury on group health insurance utilization and costs.

Authors:  Abay Asfaw; Roger Rosa; Rebecca Mao
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 8.  Oncogene proteins as biomarkers in the molecular epidemiology of occupational carcinogenesis. The example of the ras oncogene-encoded p21 protein.

Authors:  P W Brandt-Rauf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Occupational cancer in Canada: what do we know?

Authors:  K Teschke; M C Barroetavena
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Steve Bayard; Aaron Blair; Paul Brandt-Rauf; Mary Ann Butler; David Dankovic; Ann F Hubbs; Carol Jones; Myra Karstadt; Gregory L Kedderis; Ronald Melnick; Carrie A Redlich; Nathaniel Rothman; Russell E Savage; Michael Sprinker; Mark Toraason; Ainsley Weston; Andrew F Olshan; Patricia Stewart; Sheila Hoar Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.