Literature DB >> 9861187

Best estimate of the magnitude of mortality due to occupational exposure to hazardous substances.

S Morrell1, C Kerr, T Driscoll, R Taylor, G Salkeld, S Corbett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With a proportionate attributable risk approach, to estimate the magnitude of premature mortality induced by exposure to hazardous substances in the Australian workforce.
METHODS: Estimates of the magnitude of mortality induced by exposure to hazardous substances in the Australian work-force were calculated by the proportionate attributable risk approach after careful consideration of options for methodological refinements. The main data sources used were unit mortality datasets (individual deidentified death records), and tabulations when these were unavailable.
RESULTS: The estimated number of deaths that occurred in Australia each year from occupational exposure to hazardous substances was 2290; 78% of these were men. The rate of mortality attributable to occupational exposure to hazardous substances was three to four times greater in male workers than in female workers. Male (productive) person-years of life lost (PYLL) were generally eight times higher than female PYLL. Cancer was the prime cause of death, followed by renal, cardiovascular, neurological, and chronic respiratory disease. Acute toxic episodes accounted for a small proportion of mortality but yielded a much larger proportion of PYLL, reflecting the relatively young ages of those who experienced fatal effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Although national estimates of the proportions of mortality attributable to occupational exposure to hazardous substances seemed to be validly derived, uncertainties remain associated with the lack of an empirical basis for derivation of proportionate risk fractions used in the calculations. The finding of an appreciable burden of mortality that is attributable to past occupational exposure to hazardous substances emphasises the necessity for occupational health and safety authorities to measure and reduce worksite exposures. There is also an incentive to encourage the construction of appropriately designed cohort studies across industries and occupational groupings so that, ultimately, risk estimates may be directly calculated and applied to total workforce data for the definitive estimation of the magnitude of harm induced by occupational exposure to hazardous substances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9861187      PMCID: PMC1757643          DOI: 10.1136/oem.55.9.634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  17 in total

1.  Sentinel Health Events (Occupational): analysis of death certificates among residents of Nassau County, NY between 1980-82 for occupationally related causes of death.

Authors:  J P Feldman; L M Gerber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Deaths as a result of work-related injury in Australia, 1982-1984.

Authors:  J E Harrison; M S Frommer; E A Ruck; F M Blyth
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1989-02-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 3.  Self-reported stressors and hypertension: evidence of an inverse association.

Authors:  M A Winkleby; D R Ragland; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Deriving relative risks from aggregate data. 1. Theory.

Authors:  T Norström
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  An application of the Sentinel Health Event (Occupational) concept to death certificates.

Authors:  N R Lalich; L L Schuster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Urothelial cancer and some industry-related chemicals: an evaluation of the epidemiologic literature.

Authors:  G Steineck; N Plato; S E Norell; C Hogstedt
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Occupational injury and illness in the United States. Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  J P Leigh; S B Markowitz; M Fahs; C Shin; P J Landrigan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-28

8.  Health costs of occupational disease in New York State.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Markowitz; E Fischer; J Shapiro; P J Landrigan
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Occupational disease in New York State: a comprehensive examination.

Authors:  S B Markowitz; E Fischer; M C Fahs; J Shapiro; P J Landrigan
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Sentinel Health Events (occupational): a basis for physician recognition and public health surveillance.

Authors:  D D Rutstein; R J Mullan; T M Frazier; W E Halperin; J M Melius; J P Sestito
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  6 in total

1.  Where should the chemicals policy go?

Authors:  Andreas Zober; Michael Nasterlack
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Generational risks for cancers not related to tobacco, screening, or treatment in the United States.

Authors:  Yueh-Ying Han; Devra L Davis; Joel L Weissfeld; Gregg E Dinse
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The Global Burden of Occupational Disease.

Authors:  Lesley Rushton
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

4.  Qualitative and quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models in typical industries.

Authors:  Fang Tian; Meibian Zhang; Lifang Zhou; Hua Zou; Aihong Wang; Mo Hao
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Job strain - attributable depression in a sample of working Australians: assessing the contribution to health inequalities.

Authors:  Anthony D LaMontagne; Tessa Keegel; Deborah Vallance; Aleck Ostry; Rory Wolfe
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012.

Authors:  Jukka Takala; Päivi Hämäläinen; Kaija Leena Saarela; Loke Yoke Yun; Kathiresan Manickam; Tan Wee Jin; Peggy Heng; Caleb Tjong; Lim Guan Kheng; Samuel Lim; Gan Siok Lin
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.