Literature DB >> 26968716

Predictors of survival for patients with cancer after cryptogenic stroke.

Yong-Won Shin1,2, Soon-Tae Lee3,4, Keun-Hwa Jung1, Do-Yong Kim1, Chul-Kee Park5, Tae Min Kim6, Seung Hong Choi7, Kon Chu1, Sang Kun Lee1.   

Abstract

Patients with active cancer experience ischemic stroke via cryptogenic mechanisms, with cancer-associated hypercoagulability being considered a major contributor to such strokes. Despite the remarkably shortened survival of these patients, the clinical predictors of survival are poorly understood. We determined the clinical factors including D-dimer levels serving as the predictors of overall survival in these patients. Retrospective study was conducted on cancer patients who visited our hospital for acute ischemic stroke with cryptogenic mechanisms from April 2012 through November 2014. Demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging and laboratory results including coagulation markers were collected, and overall survival was calculated from the patient medical records and a governmental national database. A high D-dimer level was defined as a D-dimer level exceeding the median value from the study population (>5.50 μg/ml). A total of 93 patients were identified, with a median survival of 62 days (interquartile range 32-223 days). A high D-dimer level (p = 0.004; hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.21), systemic metastases (p = 0.02; HR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.11-3.90), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.03; HR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.03-3.10) were identified as independent predictors of poor overall survival using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. Most of the patients (87 %) were primarily treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin, n = 49; enoxaparin, n = 32). The type of low-molecular-weight heparin had no association with survival. A high D-dimer level, systemic metastases, and diabetes are independent predictors of poor survival in cancer patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptogenic stroke; D-dimer; Predictor; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26968716     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2106-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  35 in total

1.  Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Authors:  F B Taylor; C H Toh; W K Hoots; H Wada; M Levi
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Cancer-associated thrombosis: investigating the role of new oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Carlo Bonfanti; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Diabetes mellitus and ischemic stroke in the young: clinical features and long-term prognosis.

Authors:  J Putaala; R Liebkind; D Gordin; L M Thorn; E Haapaniemi; C Forsblom; P-H Groop; M Kaste; T Tatlisumak
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale.

Authors:  L B Goldstein; C Bertels; J N Davis
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-06

6.  Stroke and cancer: the importance of cancer-associated hypercoagulation as a possible stroke etiology.

Authors:  Christopher J Schwarzbach; Anke Schaefer; Anne Ebert; Valentin Held; Manuel Bolognese; Micha Kablau; Michael G Hennerici; Marc Fatar
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status, special situations, and unmet needs.

Authors:  Freek W A Verheugt; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cryptogenic subtype predicts reduced survival among cancer patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Babak B Navi; Samuel Singer; Alexander E Merkler; Natalie T Cheng; Jacqueline B Stone; Hooman Kamel; Costantino Iadecola; Mitchell S V Elkind; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; David R Anderson; Marc Rodger; Melissa Forgie; Clive Kearon; Jonathan Dreyer; George Kovacs; Michael Mitchell; Bernard Lewandowski; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.

Authors:  H P Adams; B H Bendixen; L J Kappelle; J Biller; B B Love; D L Gordon; E E Marsh
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cancer and Cerebrovascular Disease.

Authors:  Harold P Adams
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Ischemic stroke with cancer: Hematologic and embolic biomarkers and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Babak B Navi; Cenai Zhang; Carla P Sherman; Richard Genova; Natalie M LeMoss; Hooman Kamel; Scott T Tagawa; Ashish Saxena; Allyson J Ocean; Scott E Kasner; Mary Cushman; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ellinor Peerschke; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 16.036

3.  Impact of D-dimer levels for short-term or long-term outcomes in cryptogenic stroke patients.

Authors:  Tomohisa Nezu; Takaya Kitano; Satoshi Kubo; Junichi Uemura; Shinji Yamashita; Takeshi Iwanaga; Takeshi Inoue; Naohisa Hosomi; Hirofumi Maruyama; Masayasu Matsumoto; Kazumi Kimura; Yoshiki Yagita
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: A review of an underappreciated pathology.

Authors:  Babak B Navi; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 5.  Cancer and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Authors:  Babak B Navi; Scott E Kasner; Mitchell S V Elkind; Mary Cushman; Oh Young Bang; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Cancer-Related Stroke: An Emerging Subtype of Ischemic Stroke with Unique Pathomechanisms.

Authors:  Oh Young Bang; Jong-Won Chung; Mi Ji Lee; Woo-Keun Seo; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

7.  Effects of intracranial atherosclerosis and atrial fibrillation on the prognosis of ischemic stroke with active cancer.

Authors:  Ki-Woong Nam; Hyung-Min Kwon; Yong-Seok Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Plasma D-Dimer Levels for Predicting Stroke Outcome.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Chun Wang; Junhua Wu; Shiliang Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  It's Time to Say Goodbye to the ESUS Construct.

Authors:  Blanca Fuentes; Raquel Gutiérrez-Zúñiga; Exuperio Díez-Tejedor
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.